Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

GenAI-Assisted Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Assessment and DMARD Selection (RABER)

28 de octubre de 2026 actualizado por: Quan Jiang, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Prospective Evaluation of Generative AI-Augmented Clinical Decision-Making for Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk (RABER) Assessment and DMARD Selection in Routine Care

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by progressive joint damage and bone erosion. Accurate assessment of RA bone erosion risk (RABER) and appropriate disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) selection are critical to preventing irreversible disability.

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), enable integration of heterogeneous clinical data and may improve clinical decision-making. However, there is limited real-world evidence (RWE) evaluating whether GenAI can meaningfully augment physician decision-making in routine care.

This prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized interventional study evaluates the feasibility and impact of GenAI-assisted clinical decision support on physician assessment of rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion risk and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug selection in routine inpatient care. Treating physicians document their initial risk assessments and treatment decisions before reviewing patient-specific GenAI reports and subsequently record their assessments and decisions after reviewing the reports. The study evaluates changes in physician clinical decision-making within a learning health system framework. Final treatment decisions remain under the responsibility of the treating physicians. The study does not evaluate long-term patient clinical outcomes.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

100

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Quan Jiang, MD
  • Número de teléfono: 010-88001942
  • Correo electrónico: doctorjq@126.com

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Porcelana, 100053
        • Reclutamiento
        • Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
        • Contacto:
          • Quan Jiang, MD
          • Número de teléfono: 010-88001942
          • Correo electrónico: doctorjq@126.com
        • Investigador principal:
          • Quan Jiang, MD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed RA patients meeting American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism 2010 classification criteria
  • Consecutive inpatients admitted during study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients subsequently determined not to have RA
  • Incomplete clinical data preventing risk or treatment assessment

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: GenAI-Assisted RA Bone Erosion Risk Assessment and DMARD Selection

This arm will include at least 100 consecutive adult inpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving routine clinical care. For each patient, the treating physician will first independently assess bone erosion risk and select a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment strategy based on available clinical information (pre-AI assessment). The physician will then review a GenAI-generated clinical decision support report containing predicted bone erosion risk levels and DMARD recommendations and record an updated risk assessment and treatment decision (post-AI assessment). Pre-AI and post-AI physician decisions will be compared against independent expert reference standards to evaluate the impact of GenAI-assisted decision support. Treating physicians retain full responsibility for final clinical decisions.

The intervention consists of a GenAI-generated clinical decision support report provided to treating physicians during routine RA care. Using patient clinical information available at the time of assessment, the GenAI system generates predicted bone erosion risk probabilities (0-100%), risk levels (0-3), and DMARD treatment recommendations. Physicians review the report after completing their independent pre-AI assessments and may revise their risk assessments and treatment decisions based on the additional information. The GenAI system provides decision support only and does not autonomously make or implement treatment decisions.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Physician-Assessed Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Level After GenAI-Assisted Decision Support
Periodo de tiempo: During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)

The percentage of participants for whom the treating physician changes the rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion risk level after reviewing the GenAI-generated clinical decision support report, compared with the initial assessment before reviewing the report. Risk levels are categorized from 0 to 3. A change is defined as any difference between the pre-AI and post-AI risk levels. The percentage is calculated using participants with complete paired assessments.

During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)
Cohen's Kappa Agreement Between Physician-Assessed Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Levels and the Reference Standard Before and After GenAI-Assisted Decision Support
Periodo de tiempo: During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)

Agreement between physician-assessed rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion risk levels (0-3) and the reference standard will be evaluated separately before and after review of the GenAI report using Cohen's kappa coefficient. The pre-AI and post-AI kappa coefficients will be compared to assess changes in agreement following GenAI-assisted decision support. Cohen's kappa ranges from -1 to 1, with higher values indicating greater agreement beyond chance. The difference between post-AI and pre-AI kappa coefficients will be reported, with positive values indicating improved agreement. The reference classification will be established during the data analysis stage by three independent expert physicians who are not involved in patient treatment, with disagreements resolved through consensus.

During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cohen's Kappa Agreement Between Physician DMARD Treatment Selection Categories and the Reference Standard After GenAI-Assisted Decision Support
Periodo de tiempo: During index hospitalization, after physician review of the GenAI report (approximately 1-7 days)

Agreement between physician-selected disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment categories (0-4) and the reference standard will be assessed after physicians review the GenAI-generated clinical decision support report. Agreement will be quantified using Cohen's kappa coefficient, with higher values indicating greater agreement beyond chance. The analysis will include participants with complete post-AI physician treatment selections and corresponding reference standard classifications. The reference classification will be established during the data analysis stage by three independent expert physicians who are not involved in patient treatment, with disagreements resolved through consensus.

During index hospitalization, after physician review of the GenAI report (approximately 1-7 days)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de octubre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

21 de octubre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de octubre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de noviembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de octubre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2026-667-KY-01-raber1
  • CI2023C019YL (Otro número de subvención/financiamiento: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences)
  • CI2026A01501 (Otro número de subvención/financiamiento: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences)
  • HLCMHPP2023087 (Otro número de subvención/financiamiento: China National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
  • 82230121 (Otro número de subvención/financiamiento: National Natural Science Foundation of China)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .