Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Immune Responses in Patients Treated With Raltegravir (RAG-1/2)

Immune Responses to Neo-Antigens in Patients Treated With Raltegravir: Insights on V(D)J Recombination and RAG-1/2 Recombinase Function

Hypothesis: Treatment with raltegravir does not alter V(D)J recombination or immune responses to neoantigens.

A process known as V(D)J recombination is essential for developing lymphocytes and the specific functioning of the immune system. Raltegravir is the first approved drug of the new integrase inhibitor class of anti-HIV drugs. Integrase inhibitors have been shown in some studies to interfere with DNA cleavage and the activities of RAG-1/2. These studies suggest a potential to affect aspects of both B-cell and T-cell development, therefore, it is important to evaluate the potential effects that integrase inhibitors may have in clinical use. If immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes are altered by HIV integrase, then patient lymphocytes will fail to display normal responses to vaccinations.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Retirado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

V(D)J recombination is essential for developing lymphocytes and the specific functioning of the immune system. Germline gene coding segments become rearranged to create functional immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes by this recombination. The process depends on site-specific cleavage of chromosomal DNA by RAG-1 and RAG-2 recombinase. Two recombination-activating gene proteins (RAG-1/2) in conjunction make up a complex of enzymes that join gene segments of B-cell and T-cell receptor genes. RAG-1 contains most of the V(D)J recombinase active site and RAG-2 is essential in joining DNA segments during V(D)J recombination. RAG-1/2 have similarity in action to other DNA transposases and HIV-1 integrase. These similarities suggest that HIV-1 integrase inhibitors may have the potential to affect aspects of both B-cell and T-cell development.

Induction of primary immune responses to neoantigens involves the generation of specific T-cells and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody secreting B-cells. As part of this process, T and B memory cells are also generated, which have specific cell surface receptors to the antigen. On repeat exposure to the antigen, these memory T- and B-cells are triggered to generate rapid and intense secondary responses. During this secondary response, B-cells secrete abundant specific IgG antibodies with greater affinity to the antigen than for the IgM isotope. This memory response is mediated by T-cells with CD45+ RO+ phenotype. These T-cells provide B-cells the help required to generate the specific IgG. Sub-optimal antibody responses are seen in both acquired and hereditary immunodeficiency, which are due to impaired T-cell function including poor T-helper responses to B-cells and defective neo-antigen responses.

An established method to evaluate T-cell function involves testing antibody production to vaccination with phiX174, a stable bacteriophage of E. Coli that is critical in demonstrating T-cell competence. Antibody titers after primary and secondary immunization correlate with abnormal CD4 cell help. Patients with functional B-cells that lack T-cell help show a characteristic failure to switch from IgM to IgG, making this assay essential in the evaluation of V(D)J recombination.

Currently, raltegravir is the only approved integrase inhibitor that targets the integration stage of the HIV-1 lifecycle. The clinical manifestations of raltegravir-related potential adverse effects on V(D)J recombination may be so rare that they may only be observed after large numbers of patients are exposed to this drug. Evaluating the direct in vivo interaction of HIV integrase inhibitors on RAG-1/2 is difficult, therefore the best approach may be to evaluate the potential negative effects on recombinase activity downstream by studying immune function. If gene rearrangements of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor genes are altered by HIV integrase, then patient lymphocytes will fail to display normal responses to neo-antigen exposure. Since untreated HIV-infected individuals have an impaired ability to respond to new antigens, it is difficult to evaluate the responses to neo-antigens in these individuals. Therefore, to test this hypothesis, it would be best to choose patients with long-term control of HIV that have recovered immune function.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Fase

  • Fase 3

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canadá, H3G 1A4
        • Immune Deficiency Treatment Centre, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Masculino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV-1 infected males, as determined by ELISA and Western blot;
  2. >18 years of age;
  3. Current ARV therapy with efavirenz + Truvada® for >52 weeks;
  4. HIV-1 RNA (bDNA) <50 copies/ml for at least 52 weeks;
  5. No history of hepatitis A vaccine, and HAV antibody negative.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. any immunomodulatory therapy within 24 weeks of screening or during the trial;
  2. any type of vaccine within 24 weeks of screening or during the trial;
  3. current opportunistic infection, malignancy, acute infection, or febrile illness;
  4. history of hypersensitivity to a vaccine, components of a vaccine, or components of a vaccine container.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Ciencia básica
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: 1
raltegravir 400mg bid + Truvada 1 tab qd
VAQTA: 1.0ml IM at weeks 24 & 48; Pneumovax 23: 0.5ml IM at screening; Td ADSORBED: 0.5ml IM at screening; phiX174 bacteriophage: 0.02ml/kg body weight IV at weeks 28, 32, 36, 40.
Otros nombres:
  • VAQTA;
  • Pneumovax 23;
  • Td ADSORBED;
  • phiX174 bacteriophage
Comparador activo: 2
efavirenz 600mg qhs + Truvada 1 tab qd (or Atripla 1 tab qhs)
VAQTA: 1.0ml IM at weeks 24 & 48; Pneumovax 23: 0.5ml IM at screening; Td ADSORBED: 0.5ml IM at screening; phiX174 bacteriophage: 0.02ml/kg body weight IV at weeks 28, 32, 36, 40.
Otros nombres:
  • VAQTA;
  • Pneumovax 23;
  • Td ADSORBED;
  • phiX174 bacteriophage

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Percent of patients with phiX174 IgG greater than or equal to 30% of total anti-phiX174 titers
Periodo de tiempo: Two weeks after fourth phiX174 immunization
Two weeks after fourth phiX174 immunization

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Total phiX174 antibody titers
Periodo de tiempo: 2 and 4 weeks after each immunization
2 and 4 weeks after each immunization

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Christos M Tsoukas, MD, FRCPC, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de enero de 2009

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2011

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de agosto de 2011

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de noviembre de 2008

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

4 de noviembre de 2008

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

5 de noviembre de 2008

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

14 de abril de 2015

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de abril de 2015

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2015

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Infecciones por VIH

Ensayos clínicos sobre Various vaccines

3
Suscribir