- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT04077086
Corrección de la miopía entre niños de escuela secundaria para aumentar las tasas de asistencia académica a la escuela secundaria en comunidades rurales (SWISH)
SWISH (Ver Well to Stay In ScHool): prueba aleatoria de distribución de espectáculos a niños de escuela secundaria con miopía para aumentar las tasas de asistencia académica a la escuela secundaria en comunidades rurales)
Chinese children are some of the most short-sighted in the world, but only one in five children in poor areas who needs glasses has them. Our team has already shown in other trials that giving children free glasses leads to better grades and that free glasses have a bigger impact on grades than factors like parents' education level and the amount of money a family has. The effect on grades from glasses is greater than from other health services in school, like giving vitamins. Only about one in three children in rural China goes on to a regular, non-vocational high school. The investigators would like to show the Chinese government strong evidence of what glasses can do to help children continue their education, in order to help convince the government to carry out national programs to provide free glasses for children who need them.
Study Plan: The investigators will choose 111 middle schools at random in Liaoning, northern China, and all children in Year 1 at each school will go at random into one of two groups: either a group getting free glasses, with support from teachers to push them to wear the glasses ("Intervention") or a group getting just glasses prescriptions ("Control.") The main study outcome will be the proportion of children going on to academic (as opposed to vocational) high school, and the study is powered to detect a 10% difference in this figure between groups.The study will also assess whether children wear their glasses at school and how often they use blackboards (which disadvantage short-sighted children) vs textbooks to learn from. These other outcomes will help us to better understand the causal pathway between vision and high school attendance. We will also study the total cost of providing glasses and the teacher support to wear them per additional student attending academic high school, as well as student mental health outcomes. We will also collect data on the progression of nearsightedness. The hypothesis of this study is that providing glasses will increase academic high school attendance.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Research question: Will providing free glasses to myopic rural Chinese students, with a teacher incentive to promote use, increase academic high school attendance?
Design: Cluster-randomised controlled trial
Rationale: Rural Chinese children have high myopia prevalence, but poor access to glasses. Our previous trials show giving free glasses significantly improves academic performance, with greater effect size than parental education or family income, equaling or exceeding other classroom-based medical interventions. Non-vocational (academic) high school attendance is only 30% in rural western China. Strong evidence of educational benefit from glasses is needed to spur adoption of national distribution programs.
Methods: Children in Year 1 at 111 randomly-selected middle schools in Liaoning, Northern China, will be randomized by school to receive free glasses and a trial-proven teacher-based incentive to promote wear (Intervention) or prescriptions only (Control). The main outcome 3 years later will be high school attendance (powered to detect 10% difference between study groups); secondary outcomes of compliance and use of near versus distance classroom learning aids will elucidate biological plausibility of a causal pathway between myopia correction and learning. Local knowledge and attitudes about myopia and spectacle use and intervention cost-effectiveness will be studied.
Statistical methods to be employed in the analysis and justification for the choice of sample size:
Adjusted- and unadjusted-comparison of the difference between study groups
Principal analyses for the main trial will include:
- Of attendance at academic high school after Year 3 of middle school (as opposed to following a vocational pathway or leaving school).
- of observed spectacle wear at un-announced examinations at school and for self-efficacy scores.
- of mental health outcomes after Year 1 year of intervention
Sample size: Assuming 120 students per school undergoing vision screening, 50% of children failing vision screening, 30% of these needing glasses, α=0.05, intra-class correlation=0.10, explained variation by covariates=0.40, difference between the groups in the main study outcome=10%, high-school attendance rate in the Control group=50%, a sample size of 111 middle-schools (55 or 56 in each group) will provide power=80%.
Loss to follow-up in our previous school-based trials in China, SWLW I and II, was approximately 4% over the course of one school year, and so our calculations here assume a loss to follow-up of 10% over 2-3 years. However, we have not adjusted for non-compliance because we will use a strict intention-to-treat analytic approach where children in schools allocated to the Intervention group will be analysed as such irrespective of compliance and because our intention is to test the policy of making free glasses available to those students who need them, rather than the effect of those students actually wearing the glasses. Further, our expected effect size is based conservatively on previous trials with compliance rates of approximately 40%, which we feel can be improved on in the current trial with teacher incentives as above.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang, Liaoning, Porcelana, 110163
- He Eye Specialist Hospital
-
-
Xixia
-
Yinchuan, Xixia, Porcelana, 750021
- Ningxia University
-
-
-
-
Northern Ireland
-
Belfast, Northern Ireland, Reino Unido, BT12 6BJ
- Centre for Public Health
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Year 1 classes (likely age 12-15 years) at the recruited schools
- Those who will be in the second year of middle school when the intervention begins the next year
- Have uncorrected (without glasses/presenting) visual acuity of ≤6/12 in both eyes
- Refractive error meets cut-offs shown to be associated with significantly greater improvement in visual acuity when corrected (myopia ≤-0.75 diopters (D, or astigmatism (non-spherical refractive error) ≥1.00 D)
- Visual acuity can be improved to >= 6/7.5 in at least one eye with glasses.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Hyperopia ≥ 2.00 D
- Presence of visually-significant ocular condition besides refractive error
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Children at Intervention schools will receive free spectacles of a design they select, based on the child's measured refractive power and dispensed at school by the study optometrist. Additionally, teachers (but not children) in eligible classes will be informed that if 80% spectacle compliance as measured across three separate unannounced inspections was achieved, they will be given an incentive of an conditional cash transfer. The cash transfer will be deposited into the teacher's bank accounts directly. |
Intervention group children in middle school Year 1 will receive spectacles in December 2024. Assuming that the relevant effects of treatment (glasses wear) on the main study outcome are complete once examinations determining high school attendance are finished at the end of Middle School Year 3, Intervention participants will have undergone 32 months (December 2024 - July 2027) of treatment by the endpoint of the trial.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Sin intervención: Control
Children at Control schools will receive a glasses prescription and letter to the parents informing them of the refractive status of their child, with free glasses provided only at the end of the trial. No teacher incentive will be offered. Service offered to the Control group exceeds standard care, in that no school-based programs of vision screening and refraction currently exist in the study area, or in most of rural China. |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Academic high school attendance
Periodo de tiempo: In July following completion of Year 3 of Middle School. This occurs after 32 months of participant followup.
|
Proportion of children who continue to academic high school as opposed to vocational high school or no additional schooling, assessed by systematically contacting parents, teachers and students to ascertain enrolment status |
In July following completion of Year 3 of Middle School. This occurs after 32 months of participant followup.
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Compliance with spectacle wear
Periodo de tiempo: After 12 months of participant followup
|
Actual presence of spectacles on the child's face (rather than having glasses at school) at the time of an unannounced examination. |
After 12 months of participant followup
|
|
Blackboard use
Periodo de tiempo: After 12 months of participant followup
|
Frequency of blackboard versus textbook use on a questionnaire administered to class teachers, and answered as "all", "most", "about half", little" or "none" of teaching. |
After 12 months of participant followup
|
|
Cost effectiveness of intervention.
Periodo de tiempo: At study closeout, after 32 months of participant followup
|
Calculated as ratio of incremental cost to proportion of children who continue to academic high school as opposed to vocational high school or no schooling. Incremental cost is the difference of costs between implementation of intervention and control. Intervention costs will comprise the screening test, glasses (including replacements) and teacher incentives. |
At study closeout, after 32 months of participant followup
|
|
Depression and Anxiety
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
Depression and anxiety score measured with Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). The score range for depression, anxiety and stress are 0-42, with higher score indicates more severe mental health problems. |
At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Self Esteem
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
Self-esteem score measured with the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. The scores range from 0-30, with higher scores indicate higher self-esteem. |
At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Emotional and behavioral problems
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
Emotional and behavioral problems score using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), with difficulties score ranges from 0 to 40, Prosocial scale ranges from 0-10, with higher score indicates severe mental health and behavioral problems. |
At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Progression of Shortsightedness
Periodo de tiempo: At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
Progression of Shortsightedness will be measured using change in refraction over time |
At baseline and 12 months post-treatment
|
|
Parents' and students' attitude towards spectacle wear
Periodo de tiempo: After baseline
|
The primary data collection instruments are two tailored, semi-structured interview guides: one designed for the parents/guardians, and one developmentally adapted for the students. Rather than utilizing rigid survey questions, these qualitative instruments are comprised of open-ended prompts, scenarios. The students interview guide has been specifically adapted for 7th-grade students (aged 12-13). It utilizes age-appropriate terminology and focuses heavily on adolescent-specific barriers, such as peer pressure, cosmetic concerns, and school dynamics. |
After baseline
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH, Queen's University, Belfast
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- MR/S023208/1
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .