Protect Yourself: Abuse Prevention for People With Intellectual Disabilities (AP4ID)
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Statut
Les conditions
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Type d'étude
Type d'étude
Phase
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Martin R Sheehan, Ph.D.
- Numéro de téléphone: 641-603-0304
- E-mail: DocMartin817@yahoo.com
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Laura Jones, Ph.D
- Numéro de téléphone: 541-603-0304
- E-mail: jonesl@linnbenton.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, États-Unis, 97405
- Double S Instructional Systems
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- has moderate to mild mental retardation based on IQ scores ranging from 40-70
- is over 18 years old. --the participant must be able to do three of the following four skills (1) complete a simple worksheet with assistance, (2) go on simple errands alone, (3) recognize 10 or more words by site, (4) read a digital clock.
Exclusion Criteria:
- individuals who have experienced traumatic abuse and experiences symptoms suggestive of trauma, such as flashbacks, nightmares, and chronic anxiety and/or depression that is resistant to standard pharmacological and psychotherapy/behavior interventions.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: La prévention
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Nombre de bras
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / BrasGroupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / TraitementIntervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Abuse Prevention Program Condition
The abuse prevention program will address: (1) BEFORE -- (a) Learning about problem of abuse and what abuse is; (b) Knowing about types of abuse, who the abusers are and where abuse happens; (c) Planning ahead and identifying safe people; (2) DURING -- (a) Rejecting abuse by saying "no;" (b) Getting away if possible/staying safe and paying attention, (c) Staying calm and getting home; and (3) AFTER -- (a) Telling your safe person, (b) Knowing what to do and what not to do, and (c) Reporting the abuse and getting help to cope with the event.
|
The abuse prevention program will be comprised of nine shared learning modules for the individual with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and a care provider.
Each shared module will contain an action step in the Individual Response Plan and will include video, guided practice and workbook activities to equip persons with ID with a range of judgment, decision-making skills and the efficacy needed for identifying, rejecting, and reporting abuse.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Control condition
During the study the control group will receive 12 activity sheets from the ESCAPE-NOW curriculum.
Six activity sheets will be given at the initial meeting and half way through the study the remaining activity sheets will be mailed to the dyads.
We chose these activity sheets because they provide abuse information that was designed for individuals with ID.
|
The control group will receive worksheets from the ESCAPE-NOW curriculum.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Abuse Protection Concept Questionnaire
Délai: Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
This questionnaire assesses change in knowledge and attitude about various types of abuse in individuals with Intellectual Disability (ID).
The questionnaire includes three sub scales.
The first sub-scale is comprised of five open ended questions.
Score answers range from 0 to 3 with a total score of 15.
Higher scores reflect higher knowledge.
The second sub-scale presents structured questions about the five types of abuse.
The total possible score for the first part of the second sub-scale is 5 -- with higher score reflecting greater knowledge.
Participants are then shown five pictures depicting types of abuse.
Each correct response was awarded a point for a total of five.
The total possible score for sub-sale 2 is 10.
Sub-scale 3 is a 20 item forced choice -- yes (1) , no (0), don't know (0) - that assesses knowledge and attitudes.
with a total possible sub-score of 20 -- higher score equals higher knowledge.
|
Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
|
Abuse Protection Decision Making and Task Analysis Check Sheet
Délai: Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
This checklist assesses change in knowledge required by people with ID to recognize and report abuse.
It consists of five vignettes of abusive situations and two non-abusive.
Each vignette has a a possible score of 10.
The total possible score for all seven vignettes is 70 with higher scores reflecting greater knowledge.
|
Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Glascow Social Self-Efficacy Scale
Délai: Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
Change in social self-efficacy in people with moderate to mild intellectual disabilities as measured by the 17-item self-efficacy scale.
A three point response format is used to answer each question: not at all, a little bit, or a lot.
Responses are scored 0,1, and 2 respectively giving a range of 0-34.
Higher values represent better outcomes.
|
Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
|
Test of Interpersonal Competence and Personal Vulnerability
Délai: Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
Change in the 20-item multiple-choice interpersonal competence and vulnerability of individuals with ID.
Each question has three answers with only one best answer for each question.Scoring is from 0 to 1 with 1 being the best answer.
Scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores showing improvement in interpersonal competence and personal vulnerability.
|
Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
|
Social Vulnerability Questionnaire
Délai: Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
Change in social vulnerability in individuals with ID as measured by 45 items that assess social vulnerability.
Care provider rates individual with ID on a 4-point Likert scale (1=not true or never to 4= very true or always).
Scores range from 45 to 180.
Lower scores reflect improvements in social vulnerability.
|
Pre, post (9 weeks), and 2 month follow-up
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Adults with ID Consumer Satisfaction
Délai: Post (9 weeks)
|
This consumer satisfaction scale for people with ID consists of 15 items and 1 open-ended question that assesses relevance and clarity of materials and program use barriers.
The 15 items are rated on a three point scale -1= not at all; 2= somewhat; and 3= a lot.
The total possible score was 45.
Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with the program.
|
Post (9 weeks)
|
|
Learning Partner Consumer Satisfaction
Délai: Post (9 weeks)
|
This consumer satisfaction scale for the care giver (Learning Partner) consists of 31 items, and 1 open-ended question to assess usability and effectiveness of materials.
The five point scale ranged from 1= strongly agree to 5= strongly disagree.
The total possible score was 155 with lower scores reflecting greater satisfaction with the program.
|
Post (9 weeks)
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Collaborateurs
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Anticipé)
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)
Achèvement primaire
Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)
Achèvement de l'étude
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Première publication
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour publiée
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- AbusePhaseII
- R44HD079119-02 (Subvention/contrat des NIH des États-Unis)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Délai de partage IPD
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
- SÈVE
- CIF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- RSE
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .