Comparing Advanced Technologies to Standard Testing for the Diagnosis of Airway Disease in Hospital and Community Settings (BREATHE)
BREATHE: Benchmarking Respiratory Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Healthcare Excellence
Airway disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. However, it requires people to blow forcefully into a machine several times which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients.
This study is looking at whether newer technologies and other breathing tests can help diagnose COPD as accurately as standard testing. We will compare these tests in both hospital and community settings. We are interested in understanding how practical and cost-effective these tests are, including how easy they are to use and how comfortable they are for patients to perform.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Statut
Les conditions
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Long-term lung conditions such as COPD affect around one in five people and are the third leading cause of death in England. These conditions are often not picked up until they have reached an advanced stage, and sometimes people are given an incorrect diagnosis. They cause breathing difficulties due to lung damage, which cannot be reversed in the case of COPD.
At present, lung conditions are usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. These tests require people to blow forcefully into a machine several times, which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients. They also rely on specialist equipment and must be carried out and interpreted by highly trained professionals. Because there aren't enough of these professionals, waiting lists can be long. Even when spirometry is possible, it does not always detect lung disease early.
Two national NHS programmes - the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) programme and the Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programme - create opportunities to find lung disease earlier. However, the same challenges with spirometry remain.
Recently, new types of lung tests have been developed. These tests may be simpler, quicker, and cheaper to use, but they are not yet part of standard NHS care. We need to find out whether these new tests can identify lung disease as well as, or better than, spirometry, especially at earlier stages. If they can, they may help prevent further lung damage and improve health outcomes. It is also important to understand how practical and cost-effective these tests are, and whether they could be used widely in different healthcare settings.
To explore this, we will carry out the new tests alongside traditional lung function tests in both community and hospital settings. We will invite adults with possible COPD who:
- have been referred for spirometry at local CDCs,
- have been referred for lung function testing at secondary care hospitals,
- are attending for a lung scan as part of the LCS pathway, and
- are attending local community groups or events.
Participants may also be asked to complete short surveys or optional interviews to share their experiences. Healthcare professionals working in testing centres will be invited to do the same. We are especially keen to hear from people who live with lung conditions or who experience health inequalities, so that we can understand how easy the tests are to use, how comfortable they are, and whether they could work well across different healthcare settings.
Type d'étude
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Inscription
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Professor Tom M Wilkinson, MBBS PhD FRCP FERS
- Numéro de téléphone: 02381205341
- E-mail: t.wilkinson@soton.ac.uk
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Madison E Geeves, MSc BSc
- E-mail: m.e.geeves@soton.ac.uk
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Hampshire
-
Andover, Hampshire, Royaume-Uni, SP10 3LB
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
Chercheur principal:
- Harry S Griffin, PhD HCPC
-
Southampton, Hampshire, Royaume-Uni, SO16 6YD
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- New referral to community or secondary healthcare services
- Clinical suspicion of airway disease/COPD
- Able to provide fully informed written consent
- Able to fully understand and cooperate with the study protocol
- Clinically stable with no contraindications to lung function testing (outlined below)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed diagnosis of COPD
- Not willing and/or able to provide fully informed written consent to participate
- Has a relative contraindication to lung function testing [18]:
- Recent thoracic, abdominal or eye (e.g. cataract) surgery < 6 weeks
- Unstable cardiovascular status, including recent myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus < 6 weeks
- Pneumothorax < 6 weeks
- Haemoptysis of unknown origin < 6 weeks
- Thoracic, abdominal or cerebral aneurysm
- Chest infection < 6 weeks
- An acute illness or symptom that might interfere with test performance (e.g. nausea, vomiting).
- The presence of any other clinical condition that would prevent the individual from safely performing lung function tests
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
Nombre de groupes / cohortes
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / CohorteGroupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / TraitementIntervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
GP direct access spirometry within community diagnostic centres
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for spirometry testing at local community diagnostic centres
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested).
Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
|
|
Full lung function testing within secondary care hospitals
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for full lung function testing at secondary care hospitals
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested).
Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
Assesses lung diffusing capacity, performed using full pulmonary function testing equipment
Body plethysmography (if applicable).
Used to assess static lung volumes and, where applicable, specific resistance, performed using full lung function equipment
|
|
Low dose-CT scan within lung cancer screening programme
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending for a low-dose CT scan as part of the lung cancer screening programme
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
|
|
Community outreach
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending local community groups and events
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy of capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms
Délai: Baseline
|
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
|
Baseline
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy of oscillometry
Délai: Baseline
|
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
|
Baseline
|
|
Effectiveness of advanced technologies in detecting early, alternative, or precursor respiratory conditions
Délai: Baseline
|
Identification of pre-COPD using advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies in patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) / forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio on spirometry but signs of reduced FEV1, gas trapping, hyperinflation, or reduced diffusing capacity on additional lung function tests performed in secondary care, or emphysema on CT scan.
Differentiation of COPD from asthma using advanced diagnostic tests, particularly in patients presenting with overlapping respiratory symptoms
|
Baseline
|
|
Feasibility outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening pathway
Délai: Baseline
|
Recruitment uptake rate, time required and the acceptability to both patients and healthcare professional to complete additional diagnostic testing in individuals invited for low-dose CT (LDCT) as part of the lung cancer screening (LCS) pathway
|
Baseline
|
|
Time per test
Délai: Baseline
|
Time per test of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
|
Baseline
|
|
Comparative 'failure rate'
Délai: Baseline
|
Comparative 'failure rate' of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
|
Baseline
|
|
Usability and acceptability
Délai: Baseline
|
Patients' perceptions on the usability and acceptability of advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies compared to existing tests such as spirometry via a non-validated questionnaire
|
Baseline
|
|
Usability and acceptability
Délai: Baseline
|
Healthcare practitioners' perceptions on the usability, acceptability and confidence in advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies via semi-structured interviews
|
Baseline
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Collaborateurs
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Première publication
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour publiée
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Processus pathologiques
- Maladie chronique
- Attributs de la maladie
- Maladies des voies respiratoires
- Maladies pulmonaires
- Maladies pulmonaires obstructives
- Conditions pathologiques, signes et symptômes
- Maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique
- Techniques et procédures de diagnostic
- Diagnostic
- Techniques de diagnostic, système respiratoire
- Tests de fonction respiratoire
- Spirométrie
- Capnographie
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- DEV DVB0067
- 359125 (Autre identifiant: IRAS Number)
- RHM RSP0030 (Autre identifiant: Local Reference Number)
- 25/NE/0225 (Autre identifiant: REC ID)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .