Comparing Advanced Technologies to Standard Testing for the Diagnosis of Airway Disease in Hospital and Community Settings (BREATHE)
BREATHE: Benchmarking Respiratory Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Healthcare Excellence
Airway disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. However, it requires people to blow forcefully into a machine several times which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients.
This study is looking at whether newer technologies and other breathing tests can help diagnose COPD as accurately as standard testing. We will compare these tests in both hospital and community settings. We are interested in understanding how practical and cost-effective these tests are, including how easy they are to use and how comfortable they are for patients to perform.
Przegląd badań
Status
Status
Warunki
Warunki
Interwencja / Leczenie
Interwencja / Leczenie
Szczegółowy opis
Long-term lung conditions such as COPD affect around one in five people and are the third leading cause of death in England. These conditions are often not picked up until they have reached an advanced stage, and sometimes people are given an incorrect diagnosis. They cause breathing difficulties due to lung damage, which cannot be reversed in the case of COPD.
At present, lung conditions are usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. These tests require people to blow forcefully into a machine several times, which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients. They also rely on specialist equipment and must be carried out and interpreted by highly trained professionals. Because there aren't enough of these professionals, waiting lists can be long. Even when spirometry is possible, it does not always detect lung disease early.
Two national NHS programmes - the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) programme and the Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programme - create opportunities to find lung disease earlier. However, the same challenges with spirometry remain.
Recently, new types of lung tests have been developed. These tests may be simpler, quicker, and cheaper to use, but they are not yet part of standard NHS care. We need to find out whether these new tests can identify lung disease as well as, or better than, spirometry, especially at earlier stages. If they can, they may help prevent further lung damage and improve health outcomes. It is also important to understand how practical and cost-effective these tests are, and whether they could be used widely in different healthcare settings.
To explore this, we will carry out the new tests alongside traditional lung function tests in both community and hospital settings. We will invite adults with possible COPD who:
- have been referred for spirometry at local CDCs,
- have been referred for lung function testing at secondary care hospitals,
- are attending for a lung scan as part of the LCS pathway, and
- are attending local community groups or events.
Participants may also be asked to complete short surveys or optional interviews to share their experiences. Healthcare professionals working in testing centres will be invited to do the same. We are especially keen to hear from people who live with lung conditions or who experience health inequalities, so that we can understand how easy the tests are to use, how comfortable they are, and whether they could work well across different healthcare settings.
Typ studiów
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Szacowany)
Zapisy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Kontakt w sprawie studiów
Kontakt w sprawie studiów
- Nazwa: Professor Tom M Wilkinson, MBBS PhD FRCP FERS
- Numer telefonu: 02381205341
- E-mail: t.wilkinson@soton.ac.uk
Kopia zapasowa kontaktu do badania
- Nazwa: Madison E Geeves, MSc BSc
- E-mail: m.e.geeves@soton.ac.uk
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
Hampshire
-
Andover, Hampshire, Zjednoczone Królestwo, SP10 3LB
- Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
Główny śledczy:
- Harry S Griffin, PhD HCPC
-
Southampton, Hampshire, Zjednoczone Królestwo, SO16 6YD
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
- Dorosły
- Starszy dorosły
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Metoda próbkowania
Badana populacja
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age
- New referral to community or secondary healthcare services
- Clinical suspicion of airway disease/COPD
- Able to provide fully informed written consent
- Able to fully understand and cooperate with the study protocol
- Clinically stable with no contraindications to lung function testing (outlined below)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed diagnosis of COPD
- Not willing and/or able to provide fully informed written consent to participate
- Has a relative contraindication to lung function testing [18]:
- Recent thoracic, abdominal or eye (e.g. cataract) surgery < 6 weeks
- Unstable cardiovascular status, including recent myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus < 6 weeks
- Pneumothorax < 6 weeks
- Haemoptysis of unknown origin < 6 weeks
- Thoracic, abdominal or cerebral aneurysm
- Chest infection < 6 weeks
- An acute illness or symptom that might interfere with test performance (e.g. nausea, vomiting).
- The presence of any other clinical condition that would prevent the individual from safely performing lung function tests
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
Liczba grup / kohort
Kohorty i interwencje
Grupa / KohortaGrupa / Kohorta |
Interwencja / LeczenieInterwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
GP direct access spirometry within community diagnostic centres
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for spirometry testing at local community diagnostic centres
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested).
Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
|
|
Full lung function testing within secondary care hospitals
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for full lung function testing at secondary care hospitals
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested).
Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
Assesses lung diffusing capacity, performed using full pulmonary function testing equipment
Body plethysmography (if applicable).
Used to assess static lung volumes and, where applicable, specific resistance, performed using full lung function equipment
|
|
Low dose-CT scan within lung cancer screening programme
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending for a low-dose CT scan as part of the lung cancer screening programme
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
|
|
Community outreach
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending local community groups and events
|
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry).
Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy of capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
|
Baseline
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy of oscillometry
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
|
Baseline
|
|
Effectiveness of advanced technologies in detecting early, alternative, or precursor respiratory conditions
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Identification of pre-COPD using advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies in patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) / forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio on spirometry but signs of reduced FEV1, gas trapping, hyperinflation, or reduced diffusing capacity on additional lung function tests performed in secondary care, or emphysema on CT scan.
Differentiation of COPD from asthma using advanced diagnostic tests, particularly in patients presenting with overlapping respiratory symptoms
|
Baseline
|
|
Feasibility outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening pathway
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Recruitment uptake rate, time required and the acceptability to both patients and healthcare professional to complete additional diagnostic testing in individuals invited for low-dose CT (LDCT) as part of the lung cancer screening (LCS) pathway
|
Baseline
|
|
Time per test
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Time per test of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
|
Baseline
|
|
Comparative 'failure rate'
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Comparative 'failure rate' of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
|
Baseline
|
|
Usability and acceptability
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Patients' perceptions on the usability and acceptability of advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies compared to existing tests such as spirometry via a non-validated questionnaire
|
Baseline
|
|
Usability and acceptability
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
|
Healthcare practitioners' perceptions on the usability, acceptability and confidence in advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies via semi-structured interviews
|
Baseline
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Sponsor
Sponsor
Współpracownicy
Współpracownicy
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)
Rozpoczęcie studiów
Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)
Zakończenie podstawowe
Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)
Ukończenie studiów
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Pierwszy wysłany
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
- Procesy patologiczne
- Przewlekła choroba
- Atrybuty choroby
- Choroby Układu Oddechowego
- Choroby płuc
- Choroby płuc, obturacyjne
- Stany patologiczne, oznaki i objawy
- Choroba płuc, przewlekła obturacja
- Techniki i procedury diagnostyczne
- Diagnoza
- Techniki diagnostyczne, układ oddechowy
- Testy funkcji oddechowych
- Spirometria
- Kapnografia
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- DEV DVB0067
- 359125 (Inny identyfikator: IRAS Number)
- RHM RSP0030 (Inny identyfikator: Local Reference Number)
- 25/NE/0225 (Inny identyfikator: REC ID)
Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)
Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?
Opis planu IPD
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .