Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Comparing Advanced Technologies to Standard Testing for the Diagnosis of Airway Disease in Hospital and Community Settings (BREATHE)

BREATHE: Benchmarking Respiratory Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Healthcare Excellence

Airway disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. However, it requires people to blow forcefully into a machine several times which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients.

This study is looking at whether newer technologies and other breathing tests can help diagnose COPD as accurately as standard testing. We will compare these tests in both hospital and community settings. We are interested in understanding how practical and cost-effective these tests are, including how easy they are to use and how comfortable they are for patients to perform.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Long-term lung conditions such as COPD affect around one in five people and are the third leading cause of death in England. These conditions are often not picked up until they have reached an advanced stage, and sometimes people are given an incorrect diagnosis. They cause breathing difficulties due to lung damage, which cannot be reversed in the case of COPD.

At present, lung conditions are usually diagnosed through breathing tests like spirometry. These tests require people to blow forcefully into a machine several times, which can be uncomfortable and difficult for some patients. They also rely on specialist equipment and must be carried out and interpreted by highly trained professionals. Because there aren't enough of these professionals, waiting lists can be long. Even when spirometry is possible, it does not always detect lung disease early.

Two national NHS programmes - the Community Diagnostic Centre (CDC) programme and the Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) programme - create opportunities to find lung disease earlier. However, the same challenges with spirometry remain.

Recently, new types of lung tests have been developed. These tests may be simpler, quicker, and cheaper to use, but they are not yet part of standard NHS care. We need to find out whether these new tests can identify lung disease as well as, or better than, spirometry, especially at earlier stages. If they can, they may help prevent further lung damage and improve health outcomes. It is also important to understand how practical and cost-effective these tests are, and whether they could be used widely in different healthcare settings.

To explore this, we will carry out the new tests alongside traditional lung function tests in both community and hospital settings. We will invite adults with possible COPD who:

  • have been referred for spirometry at local CDCs,
  • have been referred for lung function testing at secondary care hospitals,
  • are attending for a lung scan as part of the LCS pathway, and
  • are attending local community groups or events.

Participants may also be asked to complete short surveys or optional interviews to share their experiences. Healthcare professionals working in testing centres will be invited to do the same. We are especially keen to hear from people who live with lung conditions or who experience health inequalities, so that we can understand how easy the tests are to use, how comfortable they are, and whether they could work well across different healthcare settings.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Stimato)

300

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Professor Tom M Wilkinson, MBBS PhD FRCP FERS
  • Numero di telefono: 02381205341
  • Email: t.wilkinson@soton.ac.uk

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Hampshire
      • Andover, Hampshire, Regno Unito, SP10 3LB
        • Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Harry S Griffin, PhD HCPC
      • Southampton, Hampshire, Regno Unito, SO16 6YD
        • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

Adults with a clinical suspicion of COPD/airway disease referred for spirometry testing at local community diagnostic centres or for lung function testing at secondary care hospitals. Additionally, adults attending for a low-dose CT scan as part of the lung cancer screening programme or adults attending local community groups or events

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • New referral to community or secondary healthcare services
  • Clinical suspicion of airway disease/COPD
  • Able to provide fully informed written consent
  • Able to fully understand and cooperate with the study protocol
  • Clinically stable with no contraindications to lung function testing (outlined below)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of COPD
  • Not willing and/or able to provide fully informed written consent to participate
  • Has a relative contraindication to lung function testing [18]:
  • Recent thoracic, abdominal or eye (e.g. cataract) surgery < 6 weeks
  • Unstable cardiovascular status, including recent myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus < 6 weeks
  • Pneumothorax < 6 weeks
  • Haemoptysis of unknown origin < 6 weeks
  • Thoracic, abdominal or cerebral aneurysm
  • Chest infection < 6 weeks
  • An acute illness or symptom that might interfere with test performance (e.g. nausea, vomiting).
  • The presence of any other clinical condition that would prevent the individual from safely performing lung function tests

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
GP direct access spirometry within community diagnostic centres
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for spirometry testing at local community diagnostic centres
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested). Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
Full lung function testing within secondary care hospitals
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease referred for full lung function testing at secondary care hospitals
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (if requested). Used to assess airway inflammation.
Spirometry, with or without reversibility testing
Assesses lung diffusing capacity, performed using full pulmonary function testing equipment
Body plethysmography (if applicable). Used to assess static lung volumes and, where applicable, specific resistance, performed using full lung function equipment
Low dose-CT scan within lung cancer screening programme
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending for a low-dose CT scan as part of the lung cancer screening programme
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.
Community outreach
Adults with suspected COPD/airway disease attending local community groups and events
Capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms, with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry)
Oscillometry (where applicable), with or without reversibility testing (if indicated on spirometry). Measures respiratory impedance during normal tidal breathing.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Diagnostic accuracy of capnography used in combination with machine learning-derived algorithms
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
Baseline

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Diagnostic accuracy of oscillometry
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV compared to clinician diagnosis of COPD
Baseline
Effectiveness of advanced technologies in detecting early, alternative, or precursor respiratory conditions
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Identification of pre-COPD using advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies in patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) / forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio on spirometry but signs of reduced FEV1, gas trapping, hyperinflation, or reduced diffusing capacity on additional lung function tests performed in secondary care, or emphysema on CT scan. Differentiation of COPD from asthma using advanced diagnostic tests, particularly in patients presenting with overlapping respiratory symptoms
Baseline
Feasibility outcomes in Lung Cancer Screening pathway
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Recruitment uptake rate, time required and the acceptability to both patients and healthcare professional to complete additional diagnostic testing in individuals invited for low-dose CT (LDCT) as part of the lung cancer screening (LCS) pathway
Baseline
Time per test
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Time per test of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
Baseline
Comparative 'failure rate'
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Comparative 'failure rate' of advanced diagnostic technologies compared to usual care
Baseline
Usability and acceptability
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Patients' perceptions on the usability and acceptability of advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies compared to existing tests such as spirometry via a non-validated questionnaire
Baseline
Usability and acceptability
Lasso di tempo: Baseline
Healthcare practitioners' perceptions on the usability, acceptability and confidence in advanced respiratory diagnostic technologies via semi-structured interviews
Baseline

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Collaboratori

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 settembre 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

24 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

27 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

1 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • DEV DVB0067
  • 359125 (Altro identificatore: IRAS Number)
  • RHM RSP0030 (Altro identificatore: Local Reference Number)
  • 25/NE/0225 (Altro identificatore: REC ID)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

INDECISO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Data may be shared under appropriate governance in accordance with the TidalSense and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust agreement

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .