Efficacy and Circuit Mechanisms of Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interface Therapy for Upper-Extremity Motor Function in Patients With Ischemic Stroke (BRACING)
This prospective, single-center, single-arm exploratory clinicaltrial will enroll participants with upper-extremity dysfunction after chronicischemic stroke. A total of 38 participants are planned. All enrolled participants will receive noninvasive brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled exoskeleton training for 4 weeks, once daily, 5 days per week. Upper-extremity motor function will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and other measures. The study aims to: (1) preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of noninvasive BCI-controlled exoskeleton training in promoting upper-extremity motor recovery after chronic ischemic stroke; and (2)use multimodal neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques to clarify the regulatory role of the reward-motor circuit in BCI-induced motor learning and functional recovery, and to explore key neural biomarkers and predictive models associated with treatment response.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Statut
Les conditions
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Inscription
Phase
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Yihe Wang, Dr.
- Numéro de téléphone: +8618810899617
- E-mail: Wangyh9011@163.com
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100037
- Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
-
Contact:
- Yihe Wang, Dr.
- Numéro de téléphone: 18810899617
- E-mail: Wangyh9011@163.com
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First-ever unilateral supratentorial ischemic stroke.
- Stroke onset at least 1 year previously, with stable neurological function duringthe preceding 3 months(increase in total NIHSS score≤2 points).
- Age ≥18 and≤75 years.
- Any sex.
- Unilatera FMA-UE score of 10-45.
- Able to understand simple motor instructions and complete a motor-imagery task; no clinically significant cognitive impairment, defined as MoCA>20 or MMSE>24
- Sitting balance grade I-II,with the ability to maintain a seated position formore than 15 minutes.
- Sufficient comprehension and communication ability, willingness to participate,and signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous stroke, ischemic or hemorrhagic.
- Bilateral,cerebellar, or brainstem lesions.
- Severe upper-extremity spasticity(Modifed Ashworth Scale score≥3).
- Unhealed fracture, osteoporosis, joint dislocation, or another condition affecting joint movement.
- Severe depression(Beck Depression Inventory score≥17).
- Marked hemispatial neglect or severe visuospatial impaiment.
- Any MRl contraindication.
- Current participation in another clinical trial.
- Other important comorbidities,such as traumatic brain injury, ankylosing spondylitis, malignant tumor, neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, multiplesclerosis, severe infection, unstable angina, or severe arrhythmia.
- Pregnancy or breast feeding, or inability to use appropriate contraception during the trial.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: N / A
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Nombre de bras
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / BrasGroupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / TraitementIntervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: BCI-induced Group
Patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after ischemic stroke. |
All eligible patients with upper-extremity dysfunction after chronic ischemic stroke will receive the study treatment once daily, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. The intervention uses the BCI system together with the active passive exoskeleton training system. The clinical management platform will be used for participant enrollment, assessment, treatment planning, and data archiving. |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference between the FMA-UE score at the end of treatment and the baseline FMA-UE score
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The FMA-UE total score ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better upper-extremity motor function. |
Day 90 after training.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference between the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper-extremity functional ability. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between the Motor Status Scale (MSS) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Motor Status Scale (MSS) total score ranges from 0 to 82, with higher scores indicating better upper-extremity motor function. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) total score ranges from 49 to 245, with higher scores indicating better stroke-specific quality of life. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale, 7-item version (SRMS-7) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale, 7-item version (SRMS-7), total score ranges from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating greater rehabilitation motivation. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between Apathy Evaluation Scale-Selfrated (AES-S) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Apathy Evaluation Scale-Self-rated (AES-S) total score ranges from 18 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater apathy and a worse outcome. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) total score ranges from 18 to 108, with higher scores indicating greater pleasure and less anhedonia. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) total score ranges from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity and a worse outcome. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher score. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between fMRI/sMRI measures of structural and functional brain changes at the end of treatment and the baseline.
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
EEG and fNIRS measures depend on the prespecified electrophysiological or hemodynamic metric. |
Day 90 after training.
|
|
The difference between EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures at the end of treatment and the baseline, including decoding accuracy, cortical activation, and brain-network topology
Délai: Day 90 after training.
|
EEG and fNIRS measures depend on the prespecified electrophysiological or hemodynamic metric. |
Day 90 after training.
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Délai |
|---|---|
|
Incidence of Adverse events
Délai: From baseline through the Day 90 follow-up visit.
|
From baseline through the Day 90 follow-up visit.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Première publication
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour publiée
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- BCI-Stroke
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
The Steering Committee will consider on a case-by-case basis requests for data sharing.
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .