- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT06654310
Les fondamentaux de la communication en chirurgie (FCS)
Les fondamentaux de la communication en chirurgie (FCS) : une étude pilote pour évaluer l'évolutivité et l'impact d'un programme de communication clinique
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of the FCS curriculum on achieving the learning objectives and resident reported self-efficacy with communication skills and determine the scalability of the training across a range of general surgery training programs
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
The researchers have developed a 5-year curriculum for surgical trainees called the Fundamentals of Communication in Surgery (FCS). The training includes core communication skills, e.g., expressing empathy, and frameworks to support informed consent and serious illness conversations, specifically Best Case/Worst Case and Better Conversations. The curriculum provides one developmentally appropriate two-hour session for each of the five years of surgical training. Because the training is skills based (e.g., scenario planning) and not procedure based (e.g., goals of care conversations) exercises are focused on specific techniques that build over subsequent sessions.
Researchers will invite 1-3 surgical attendings per site with an interest in surgical education to serve as trainers for the FCS curriculum.
All general surgery trainees at each institution will have access to the training program as part of their regularly scheduled educational curriculum, regardless of training year or status as a categorical resident. If there is interest, researchers will provide access to the curriculum to fellows and residents in affiliated programs, e.g., plastic surgery.
Researchers will invite site personnel who have roles related to surgical education including the program director and associate program director (if applicable), 2 to 3 attending surgeons who have high contact with residents in urgent care settings (e.g., emergency general surgery), 1 to 2 members of the education coordination team.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, États-Unis, 53706
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Méthode d'échantillonnage
Population étudiée
Participants will be from each participating site.
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- surgical attendings with an interest in surgical education
- surgery trainees
Exclusion Criteria:
- none
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Modèles d'observation: CASE_ONLY
- Perspectives temporelles: PROSPECTIVE
Cohortes et interventions
Groupe / Cohorte |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Learners
All general surgery trainees at each institution will have access to the training program as part of their regularly scheduled educational curriculum, regardless of training year or status as a categorical resident. |
The UW study team will conduct two 2-hour train-the-trainer sessions with all surgical attendings who have committed to participation as a trainer in the FCS curriculum. The designated trainer will deliver each 2-hour session during the existing formal educational time for residents. If existing protected educational time will not allow for a 2-hour training session, the sessions can be delivered in two 1-hour sessions. These sessions will be incorporated into the curriculum similar to all other formal training provided to residents with the same expectations to attend. Each 2-hour FCS session starts with a 30-minute exercise in empathic communication. The remaining 90 minutes are devoted to skills that support decision making about surgery. |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Trainee Reaction to the Training
Délai: Day of training through 2 months post-training
|
Surgical trainees will complete a 5-item survey on a scale of 1-5 (1= strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree). Total scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the curriculum. |
Day of training through 2 months post-training
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Trainee Self-Efficacy - Ability
Délai: Before training, directly after training, and 2 months post-training
|
Surgical trainees will complete an 8-item ability survey on a scale of 1-5 (1= not at all able to do, 5= easily able to do). Total scores range from 8-40, with higher scores indicating a better ability to communicate. |
Before training, directly after training, and 2 months post-training
|
|
Receipt of Curriculum
Délai: 1 day of training
|
Educational coordinators will provide a direct count of the number of categorical residents who attend their session, divided by the total number eligible to attend. |
1 day of training
|
|
Performance of Skills
Délai: Baseline (before training), directly after training, and 2 months post-training
|
Trainers will observe surgical trainees to evaluate them on various items using a scoring rubric. Each item will be scored as not done, done, or exceptional. Binary Scoring (0/1) 0: Not Done 1: Done Ternary Scoring (0/1/2) 0: Not Done
|
Baseline (before training), directly after training, and 2 months post-training
|
|
Fidelity to the Intervention
Délai: 1 day of training
|
A member of the UW study team will travel to each institution once to observe one 2-hour educational session in person. The observer will use an implementation checklist (rubric) to record performance of discrete elements of the curriculum and the fidelity to the overall training program goals as described in the learning objectives. |
1 day of training
|
|
Trainee Self-Efficacy - Preparedness
Délai: Before training, directly after training, and 2 months post-training
|
Surgical trainees will also complete a 6-item preparedness survey with a scale of 1-5 (1= not at all prepared, 5= very well prepared). Total scores range from 6-35, with higher scores indicating greater confidence in navigating treatment decisions. |
Before training, directly after training, and 2 months post-training
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Margaret (Gretchen) L Schwarze, MD, MPP, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2024-0620
- A539750 (Autre identifiant: UW- Madison)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .