Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Validation de l'échelle d'activation comportementale pour la dépression chez les personnes souffrant de troubles liés à l'utilisation de substances (BADS-SUD)

3 novembre 2026 mis à jour par: Lauro Gutiérrez Castro

Validation psychométrique de l'échelle d'activation comportementale pour la dépression (BADS) dans un échantillon clinique de personnes souffrant de troubles liés à l'usage de substances

This cross-sectional observational study evaluates the psychometric properties, structural validity, item response characteristics, and concurrent criterion validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) in adults receiving clinical treatment for substance use disorders (SUD). The study examines the scale's dimensional structure, reliability, and association with environmental reward (Environmental Reward Observation Scale, EROS) in a primary clinical cohort of 289 participants. Concurrent and discriminant validity analyses with additional clinical measures (assessing borderline symptom severity, impulsivity, anxiety, and anger expression) were evaluated in a verified sequential subcohort of 59 participants with fully confirmed individual-level linkage across multi-scale administration sheets. This retrospective study record documents the completed psychometric evaluation conducted within a specialized residential therapeutic community.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This study employs a cross-sectional observational design to evaluate the psychometric properties and dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) in individuals receiving residential or intensive clinical treatment for substance use disorders. The completed validation protocol comprises two complementary analytic components:

  1. Primary Cohort Analyses (N = 289):

    Analyses of internal structure, categorical confirmatory factor analysis (using WLSMV estimation on polychoric correlations), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), bifactor modeling, item response theory (Samejima's Graded Response Model), and internal consistency reliability were conducted in a primary clinical sample of 289 adult patients. Item completeness reached 99.7% across the 25 BADS items (288 complete records, 1 record with six items omitted). Concurrent criterion validity with perceived environmental reward was examined across this entire cohort using the Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS).

  2. Secondary Multi-Scale Clinical Analyses (Verified n = 59):

Concurrent and discriminant relationships with external clinical constructs-including borderline symptom severity (BSL-23), impulsivity (BIS-11), generalized anxiety (GAD-7), and anger expression (STAXI-2)-were evaluated. Although 155 multi-scale records were captured during clinical testing and earlier study drafts described an analytic target of 127 participants, retrospective quality control revealed an unindexed row offset in spreadsheet transcriptions beginning at record 60. To maintain strict scientific integrity and avoid mispairing, concurrent multi-battery analyses are reported exclusively on the initial sequential subcohort of 59 participants whose individual identity, sex, age, and questionnaire administration sequence are verified at 100%. Remaining captured records remain designated as pending verification against institutional physical charts.

This record reflects the retrospective documentation and post-completion reconciliation of the completed study protocol.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Réel)

289

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Jalisco
      • Ajijic, Jalisco, Mexique, 45920
        • Comunidad Terapéutica Under The Tree

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 68 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

The study population consists of adults receiving residential treatment for substance use disorders in a therapeutic community setting. Participants represent a clinically relevant population characterized by difficulties in mood regulation, behavioral activation, emotional dysregulation, and related psychological symptoms commonly associated with substance use disorders.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 to 68 years.
  • Primary clinical diagnosis of Substance Use Disorder (evaluated in accordance with DSM-5 criteria) currently receiving residential or intensive clinical treatment in a therapeutic community setting.
  • Literacy and fluency in Spanish sufficient to complete self-report instruments.
  • Provision of voluntary written informed consent.
  • Completion of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment, active psychosis, or acute neurological conditions precluding accurate self-reporting.
  • Active substance intoxication or acute withdrawal symptoms at the time of testing that interfere with questionnaire completion.
  • Substantial missing data preventing psychometric modeling (participants with at least 75% item completion on the primary instrument were retained for categorical estimation under pairwise/FIML algorithms).

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Modèles d'observation: CASE_ONLY
  • Perspectives temporelles: CROSS_SECTIONAL

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Individuals With Substance Use Disorders

Single clinical group composed of adults receiving treatment for substance use disorders who completed the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) and additional self-report measures as part of a cross-sectional observational study.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Psychometric Validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)
Délai: Baseline (single cross-sectional assessment).

Psychometric properties of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS), including internal structure (confirmatory factor analysis), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha and/or omega), and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity), assessed using self-report data collected at a single time point in individuals with substance use disorders. Subscale scores will also be examined, with higher scores reflecting greater expression of the respective behavioral domains.

Baseline (single cross-sectional assessment).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale With the Borderline Symptom List-23
Délai: Single cross-sectional assessment conducted at the time of psychological evaluation during residential treatment.

Convergent and discriminant validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale will be examined through its association with scores on the Borderline Symptom List-23, a self-report measure of borderline symptom severity and behavioral dysregulation. The Borderline Symptom List-23 provides a mean total score ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater severity of borderline symptomatology. Associations will be analyzed using continuous scores to evaluate the extent to which behavioral activation and avoidance patterns measured by the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale relate to clinical severity and emotional dysregulation in individuals with substance use disorders. The Borderline Symptom List-23 is a 23-item self-report scale scored on a 5-point Likert-type format (0 to 4), producing a mean total score ranging from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater severity of borderline symptomatology and emotional dysregulation.

Single cross-sectional assessment conducted at the time of psychological evaluation during residential treatment.
Convergent Validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale With the Environmental Reward Observation Scale
Délai: Single cross-sectional assessment conducted at the time of psychological evaluation during residential treatment.

Convergent validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) will be evaluated through its association with the Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS), a self-report measure assessing perceived availability and frequency of environmental positive reinforcement. The EROS consists of 10 items scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree), yielding total scores ranging from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived availability of environmental positive reinforcement. Correlations between BADS subscale and total scores and EROS scores will be analyzed as continuous variables across the primary clinical cohort (N = 289) to examine the theoretical correspondence between behavioral activation processes and perceived environmental reinforcement in a residential substance use treatment setting.

Single cross-sectional assessment conducted at the time of psychological evaluation during residential treatment.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Lauro Gutiérrez Castro, Under The Tree Therapeutic Community

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

18 mars 2024

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

30 novembre 2025

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

22 octobre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

7 janvier 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

6 février 2026

Première publication (Réel)

9 février 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

6 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 novembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner