Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Short-Term vs. Long-Term Valganciclovir Therapy for Symptomatic Congenital CMV Infections

13 agosto 2015 aggiornato da: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Blinded Investigation of Six Weeks vs. Six Months of Oral Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants With Symptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection (CASG 112)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause hearing loss and mental retardation. The purpose of this study is to compare a 6-week course to a 6-month course of the drug valganciclovir in babies born with CMV to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment. Participants will include 104 infants (30 days old or younger) born with CMV disease. All infants will take valganciclovir by mouth for 6 weeks. At the end of the 6 week period, subjects will be assigned by chance to receive either valganciclovir or placebo (inactive substance) to complete the 6 months of antiviral treatment. Patients will be followed for the study related evaluations of safety, changes to hearing, and developmental milestones for up to 2 years. Patients will be followed by telephone contact for an additional 3 years. Thus, participants may be involved in study related procedures for approximately 5 years.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Stato

Indica lo stato di reclutamento attuale o lo stato di accesso ampliato.
Completato

Condizioni

Condizioni

La malattia, il disturbo, la sindrome, la malattia o la lesione oggetto di studio. Su ClinicalTrials.gov, le condizioni possono includere anche altri problemi relativi alla salute, come la durata della vita, la qualità della vita e i rischi per la salute.

Intervento / Trattamento

Intervento / Trattamento

Un processo o un'azione che è al centro di uno studio clinico. Gli interventi includono farmaci, dispositivi medici, procedure, vaccini e altri prodotti sperimentali o già disponibili. Gli interventi possono anche includere approcci non invasivi, come l'educazione o la modifica della dieta e dell'esercizio fisico.

Descrizione dettagliata

This study is a multi-center, prospective, international, Phase III, randomized and blinded investigation of 6 weeks versus 6 months of oral valganciclovir therapy in babies with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Following enrollment, study subjects will receive 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir. Near the end of the 6-week course, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion either to continue on valganciclovir to complete 6 months of therapy or to begin a matching placebo to complete the 6 months. Study subjects will be stratified according to whether or not there is central nervous system (CNS) involvement at study entry. During the 6-month treatment period and the 1 month thereafter, study subjects will be followed weekly for 4 weeks, then every other week for 8 weeks, then every month for 4 months. At each of these visits, safety labs will be checked, growth parameters recorded, and adverse events assessed. The dose of study medication will be adjusted for weight gain at each of these study visits. Dose adjustments may also occur as indicated per protocol for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal impairment. Whole blood will be obtained for CMV viral load at each of these visits as well. Hearing outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Developmental outcomes will be assessed at 12 months and 24 months. Changes in whole blood viral load measurements will be correlated with both hearing and neurologic outcomes. In study subjects with increasing whole blood viral loads during the course of treatment, assessment for antiviral resistance may be undertaken.Safety assessments include: hematology labs, chemistry labs, physical examinations, and adverse event data performed/collected serially. Development of neutropenia will be confirmed by repeat blood testing within one week, and study drug will be held until it resolves. Efficacy assessments include: hearing assessments at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months; and neurodevelopmental assessments at 12 months and 24 months. Study objectives are: to compare the impact on hearing outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the safety profile of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral therapy with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the impact on neurologic outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; and to correlate change in whole blood viral load with hearing and neurologic outcomes. Participants will include 104 male and female neonates (less than or equal to 30 days) with symptomatic congenital CMV.

Tipo di studio

Tipo di studio

Descrive la natura di uno studio clinico. I tipi di studio includono studi interventistici (chiamati anche studi clinici), studi osservazionali (compresi i registri dei pazienti) e accesso allargato.
Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

Iscrizione

Il numero di partecipanti a uno studio clinico. L'iscrizione "anticipata" è il numero target di partecipanti di cui i ricercatori hanno bisogno per lo studio.
109

Fase

Fase

La fase di una sperimentazione clinica che studia un farmaco o un prodotto biologico, sulla base delle definizioni sviluppate dalla Food and Drug Administration (FDA) statunitense. La fase si basa sull'obiettivo dello studio, sul numero di partecipanti e su altre caratteristiche. Ci sono cinque fasi: Early Phase 1 (precedentemente indicata come Fase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 e Phase 4. Not Applicable è usato per descrivere sperimentazioni senza fasi definite dalla FDA, incluse sperimentazioni di dispositivi o interventi comportamentali.
  • Fase 3

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Regno Unito
      • Birmingham, Regno Unito, B9 5SS
        • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
      • Liverpool, Regno Unito, L12 2AP
        • Alder Hey Childrens Hospital
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, Regno Unito, NE4 6BE
        • Newcastle General Hospital
    • Bristol, City of
      • Bristol, Bristol, City of, Regno Unito, BS2 8AE
        • Bristol Royal Hospital for Children - UBHT Education Centre
    • London, City of
      • London, London, City of, Regno Unito, NW3 2PF
        • University College London - Royal Free Campus - Virology
      • London, London, City of, Regno Unito, SW17 0QT
        • Saint George's Hospital - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, Regno Unito, OX3 9DU
        • John Radcliffe Hospital
  • Stati Uniti
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, Stati Uniti, 35233-1711
        • University of Alabama - Children's of Alabama - Clinical Virology
      • Mobile, Alabama, Stati Uniti, 36604-3207
        • University of South Alabama - Children's Specialty Clinic
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, Stati Uniti, 72202-3500
        • Arkansas Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti, 90033-1075
        • Los Angeles County - University of Southern California - Medical Center - Pediatrics
      • Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti, 90048-5970
        • Plaza Towers Obstetrics and Gynecology
      • Orange, California, Stati Uniti, 92868-3835
        • Children's Hospital of Orange County - Infectious Diseases
      • Stanford, California, Stati Uniti, 94305-2200
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, Stati Uniti, 80045-7106
        • Children's Hospital Colorado - Infectious Disease
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, Stati Uniti, 20010-2916
        • Children's National Medical Center - Sheikh Zayed Campus - Infectious Disease
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, Stati Uniti, 32209-6511
        • University of Florida - College of Medicine - Jacksonville
      • Tampa, Florida, Stati Uniti, 33606-3438
        • University of South Florida - Tampa General Hospital - Pediatrics
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, Stati Uniti, 30322-1014
        • Emory Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, Stati Uniti, 40202-1821
        • University of Louisville School of Medicine - Kosair Childrens Hospital - Infectious Diseases
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, Stati Uniti, 70112-2600
        • Tulane University - Tulane Medical Center - Pediatrics
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, Stati Uniti, 71103-4228
        • Louisiana State University Health Shreveport - Pediatrics
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 21287-0011
        • Johns Hopkins Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti, 02115-5711
        • Children's Hospital Boston - Infectious Diseases
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, Stati Uniti, 55455-0341
        • University of Minnesota - Pediatric Infectious Disease
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, Stati Uniti, 39216-4505
        • University of Mississippi - Children's Infectious Diseases
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, Stati Uniti, 64108-4619
        • Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics - Infectious Diseases
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, Stati Uniti, 63110-1010
        • Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Center for Clinical Studies
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, Stati Uniti, 68131-2137
        • Creighton University Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, Stati Uniti, 08901-1766
        • Childrens Hospital at Saint Peters University Hospital - Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, Stati Uniti, 08901-1935
        • Robert Wood Johnson Medical School - Pediatrics
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, Stati Uniti, 14222-2006
        • Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo - Infectious Diseases
      • Manhasset, New York, Stati Uniti, 11030-3816
        • Cohen Children's Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
      • Rochester, New York, Stati Uniti, 14642-0001
        • University of Rochester Medical Center - Golisano Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
      • Syracuse, New York, Stati Uniti, 13210-2342
        • SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital - Pediatrics
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 28203-5812
        • Carolinas Medical Center - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44109-1998
        • MetroHealth Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Disease
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44195-0001
        • Cleveland Clinic Main Campus - Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases
      • Columbus, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 43205-2664
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 15224-1529
        • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Stati Uniti, 02903-4923
        • Rhode Island Hospital - Pediatrics
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, Stati Uniti, 29425-8903
        • Medical University of South Carolina - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, Stati Uniti, 37232-0011
        • Vanderbilt University - Pediatric - Infectious Diseases
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, Stati Uniti, 75235-7701
        • Children's Medical Center Dallas - Neonatal ICU
      • Dallas, Texas, Stati Uniti, 75390-9063
        • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Pediatrics
      • Fort Worth, Texas, Stati Uniti, 76104-2710
        • Cook Children's Infectious Disease Services
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, Stati Uniti, 84108-1457
        • University of Utah - Pediatric Pharmacology Program
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Stati Uniti, 98105-3901
        • Seattle Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Criteri di ammissibilità

I requisiti chiave che devono soddisfare le persone che vogliono partecipare a uno studio clinico o le caratteristiche che devono avere. I criteri di ammissibilità sono costituiti sia da criteri di inclusione (necessari a una persona per partecipare allo studio) sia da criteri di esclusione (che impediscono a una persona di partecipare). I tipi di criteri di ammissibilità includono se uno studio accetta volontari sani, ha requisiti di età o gruppo di età o è limitato dal sesso.

Età idonea allo studio

Non più vecchio di 4 settimane (Bambino)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
  • Confirmation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) from urine or throat swab specimens by culture, shell vial, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests

  • Symptomatic congenital CMV disease, as manifest by one or more of the following:

    1. Thrombocytopenia
    2. Petechiae
    3. Hepatomegaly
    4. Splenomegaly
    5. Intrauterine growth restriction
    6. Hepatitis (elevated transaminases and/or bilirubin)
    7. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement of the CMV disease [such as microcephaly, radiographic abnormalities indicative of CMV CNS disease, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices for age, chorioretinitis, hearing deficits as detected by formal brainstem evoked response (not a screening auditory brainstem response {ABR}), and/or positive CMV PCR from CSF]
  • Less than or equal to 30 days of age at study enrollment
  • Weight at study enrollment greater than or equal to 1800 grams
  • Gestational age greater than or equal to 32 weeks at birth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Imminent demise
  • Patients receiving other antiviral agents or immune globulin
  • Gastrointestinal abnormality which might preclude absorption of an oral medication (e.g., a history of necrotizing enterocolitis)
  • Documented renal insufficiency, as noted by a creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min/1.73m^2 at time of study enrollment
  • Breastfeeding from mother who is receiving ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, or maribivir
  • Infants known to be born to women who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive (but HIV testing is not required for study entry)
  • Current receipt of other investigational drugs

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Triplicare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm

Un gruppo o sottogruppo di partecipanti a uno studio clinico che riceve un intervento/trattamento specifico o nessun intervento, secondo il protocollo dello studio.
Intervento / Trattamento

Intervento / Trattamento

Un processo o un'azione che è al centro di uno studio clinico. Gli interventi includono farmaci, dispositivi medici, procedure, vaccini e altri prodotti sperimentali o già disponibili. Gli interventi possono anche includere approcci non invasivi, come l'educazione o la modifica della dieta e dell'esercizio fisico.
Sperimentale: Valganciclovir
Six months of oral Valganciclovir.
Droga: Valganciclovir
Mono-valyl ester pro-drug of ganciclovir, oral solution, provided as a 12 grams of powder containing 5 grams of Valganciclovir free base. The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: Providone K30, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, sodium saccharin, mannitol, flavor, and purified water.
Comparatore placebo: Placebo
Six weeks of oral Valganciclovir followed by placebo to complete the six month time period.
Altro: Placebo
9 grams of powder which contains no Valganciclovir free base. The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: mannitol, lactose anhydrous, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, saccharin sodium, flavor, and purified water.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misure di risultato primarie

Nel protocollo di uno studio clinico, la misura dell'esito pianificato più importante per valutare l'effetto di un intervento/trattamento. La maggior parte degli studi clinici ha una misura di esito primaria, ma alcuni ne hanno più di una.
Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 6 Months.
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 6 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 6 months

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misure di risultato secondarie

Nel protocollo di uno studio clinico, una misura dell'esito pianificato che non è importante quanto la misura dell'esito primario per valutare l'effetto di un intervento ma è comunque di interesse. La maggior parte degli studi clinici ha più di una misura di esito secondaria.
Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Adverse Events Which Lead to Permanent Discontinuation of Valganciclovir Therapy or Lead to Irreversible Outcome of the Adverse Event.
Lasso di tempo: baseline through 7 months
Adverse events were assessed at each visit through month 7 of the study. No subject discontinued valganciclovir therapy due to permanent discontinuation of valganciclovir therapy or lead to irreversible outcome of any adverse event.
baseline through 7 months
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 12 Months.
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 12 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 12 months
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 24 Months.
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 24 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 24 months
Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 6 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 6 months
Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 12 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 12 months
Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 24 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 24 months
Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 6 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 6 months
Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 12 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 12 months
Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 24 months
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist. At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained. At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained. A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels). The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications. Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
Between baseline and 24 months
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cogonitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Receptive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Fine Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Gross Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
Motor Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
12 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
Receptive Communication Scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
24 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 months after enrollment
Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores are between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cognitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
24 months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
24 Months after enrollment
Neurologic Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
24 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
Fine motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
24 Months after enrollment
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment.
Gross motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
24 Months after enrollment.
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
Motor composite score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
24 Months after enrollment

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Sponsor

L'organizzazione o la persona che avvia lo studio e che ha autorità e controllo sullo studio.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

Inizio studio

La data effettiva in cui il primo partecipante è stato arruolato in uno studio clinico. La data di inizio dello studio "prevista" è la data che i ricercatori pensano sarà la data di inizio dello studio.
1 giugno 2008

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

Completamento primario

La data in cui l'ultimo partecipante a uno studio clinico è stato esaminato o ha ricevuto un intervento per raccogliere i dati finali per la misura dell'esito primario. Il fatto che lo studio clinico sia terminato secondo il protocollo o sia stato interrotto non influisce su questa data. Per gli studi clinici con più di una misura di esito primario con diverse date di completamento, questo termine si riferisce alla data in cui la raccolta dei dati è completata per tutte le misure di esito primario. La data di completamento principale "prevista" è la data che i ricercatori ritengono sarà la data di completamento principale per lo studio.
1 dicembre 2011

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

Completamento dello studio

La data in cui l'ultimo partecipante a uno studio clinico è stato esaminato o ha ricevuto un intervento/trattamento per raccogliere i dati finali per le misure di esito primarie, le misure di esito secondarie e gli eventi avversi (ovvero l'ultima visita dell'ultimo partecipante). La data di completamento dello studio "prevista" è la data che i ricercatori ritengono sarà la data di completamento dello studio.
1 giugno 2013

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

Primo inviato

La data in cui lo sponsor o il ricercatore dello studio ha inviato per la prima volta un record di studio a ClinicalTrials.gov. In genere c'è un ritardo di alcuni giorni tra la prima data di invio e la disponibilità del record su ClinicalTrials.gov (la prima data di invio).
26 aprile 2007

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

La data in cui lo sponsor dello studio o il ricercatore invia per la prima volta un record di studio che è coerente con i criteri di revisione del controllo di qualità (QC) della National Library of Medicine (NLM). Lo sponsor o lo sperimentatore potrebbe dover rivedere e inviare un record di studio una o più volte prima che i criteri di revisione QC di NLM siano soddisfatti. È responsabilità dello sponsor o dello sperimentatore garantire che il record dello studio sia coerente con i criteri di revisione QC NLM.
26 aprile 2007

Primo Inserito (Stima)

Primo Inserito

La data in cui il record dello studio è stato disponibile per la prima volta su ClinicalTrials.gov dopo la conclusione della revisione del controllo di qualità (QC) della National Library of Medicine (NLM). In genere c'è un ritardo di alcuni giorni tra la data in cui lo sponsor dello studio o lo sperimentatore ha presentato il record dello studio e la prima data pubblicata.
27 aprile 2007

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato

La data più recente in cui le modifiche al record di uno studio sono state rese disponibili su ClinicalTrials.gov. Potrebbe esserci un ritardo tra il momento in cui le modifiche sono state inviate a ClinicalTrials.gov dallo sponsor o dallo sperimentatore dello studio (data di invio dell'ultimo aggiornamento) e la data di pubblicazione dell'ultimo aggiornamento.
26 agosto 2015

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

La data più recente in cui lo sponsor dello studio o il ricercatore ha presentato modifiche a un record di studio che sono coerenti con i criteri di revisione del controllo di qualità (QC) della National Library of Medicine (NLM). È responsabilità dello sponsor o dello sperimentatore garantire che il record dello studio sia coerente con i criteri di revisione QC NLM.
13 agosto 2015

Ultimo verificato

Ultimo verificato

La data più recente in cui lo sponsor dello studio o il ricercatore ha confermato che le informazioni su uno studio clinico su ClinicalTrials.gov sono accurate e aggiornate. Se uno studio con stato di reclutamento di reclutamento; non ancora reclutamento; o attivo, non reclutamento non è stato confermato negli ultimi 2 anni, lo stato di reclutamento dello studio viene mostrato come sconosciuto.
1 luglio 2015

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

Identificatori o numeri ID diversi dal numero NCT assegnati a uno studio clinico dallo sponsor, dai finanziatori o da altri dello studio. Questi numeri possono includere identificatori univoci di altri registri di sperimentazione e numeri di sovvenzioni del National Institutes of Health.
  • 06-0046
  • CASG 112

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Impostazioni dei cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per assicurarci di darti la migliore esperienza sul nostro sito web. Per maggiori dettagli leggi attentamente la nostra Informativa sulla privacy e sui cookie. ...>>>Puoi modificare le tue preferenze o revocare il tuo consenso in qualsiasi momento eliminando i cookie dal tuo sito web o computer come descritto nella policy. Accettalo e scegli le tue preferenze spuntando le caselle corrispondenti nella sezione "Gestisci impostazioni" di seguito. Leggi attentamente i nostri Termini di servizio prima di procedere con l'utilizzo di qualsiasi parte di questo sito web.
«Gestisci impostazioni