- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT00466817
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Valganciclovir Therapy for Symptomatic Congenital CMV Infections
13 agosto 2015 aggiornato da: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Blinded Investigation of Six Weeks vs. Six Months of Oral Valganciclovir Therapy in Infants With Symptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection (CASG 112)
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause hearing loss and mental retardation.
The purpose of this study is to compare a 6-week course to a 6-month course of the drug valganciclovir in babies born with CMV to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment.
Participants will include 104 infants (30 days old or younger) born with CMV disease.
All infants will take valganciclovir by mouth for 6 weeks.
At the end of the 6 week period, subjects will be assigned by chance to receive either valganciclovir or placebo (inactive substance) to complete the 6 months of antiviral treatment.
Patients will be followed for the study related evaluations of safety, changes to hearing, and developmental milestones for up to 2 years.
Patients will be followed by telephone contact for an additional 3 years.
Thus, participants may be involved in study related procedures for approximately 5 years.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
This study is a multi-center, prospective, international, Phase III, randomized and blinded investigation of 6 weeks versus 6 months of oral valganciclovir therapy in babies with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease.
Following enrollment, study subjects will receive 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir.
Near the end of the 6-week course, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion either to continue on valganciclovir to complete 6 months of therapy or to begin a matching placebo to complete the 6 months.
Study subjects will be stratified according to whether or not there is central nervous system (CNS) involvement at study entry.
During the 6-month treatment period and the 1 month thereafter, study subjects will be followed weekly for 4 weeks, then every other week for 8 weeks, then every month for 4 months.
At each of these visits, safety labs will be checked, growth parameters recorded, and adverse events assessed.
The dose of study medication will be adjusted for weight gain at each of these study visits.
Dose adjustments may also occur as indicated per protocol for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or renal impairment.
Whole blood will be obtained for CMV viral load at each of these visits as well.
Hearing outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months.
Developmental outcomes will be assessed at 12 months and 24 months.
Changes in whole blood viral load measurements will be correlated with both hearing and neurologic outcomes.
In study subjects with increasing whole blood viral loads during the course of treatment, assessment for antiviral resistance may be undertaken.Safety assessments include: hematology labs, chemistry labs, physical examinations, and adverse event data performed/collected serially.
Development of neutropenia will be confirmed by repeat blood testing within one week, and study drug will be held until it resolves.
Efficacy assessments include: hearing assessments at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months; and neurodevelopmental assessments at 12 months and 24 months.
Study objectives are: to compare the impact on hearing outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the safety profile of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral therapy with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; to compare the impact on neurologic outcomes of 6 weeks versus 6 months of antiviral treatment with valganciclovir oral solution in infants with symptomatic congenital CMV disease; and to correlate change in whole blood viral load with hearing and neurologic outcomes.
Participants will include 104 male and female neonates (less than or equal to 30 days) with symptomatic congenital CMV.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
109
Fase
- Fase 3
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Birmingham, Regno Unito, B9 5SS
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
-
Liverpool, Regno Unito, L12 2AP
- Alder Hey Childrens Hospital
-
Newcastle Upon Tyne, Regno Unito, NE4 6BE
- Newcastle General Hospital
-
-
Bristol, City of
-
Bristol, Bristol, City of, Regno Unito, BS2 8AE
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children - UBHT Education Centre
-
-
London, City of
-
London, London, City of, Regno Unito, NW3 2PF
- University College London - Royal Free Campus - Virology
-
London, London, City of, Regno Unito, SW17 0QT
- Saint George's Hospital - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
-
-
Oxfordshire
-
Oxford, Oxfordshire, Regno Unito, OX3 9DU
- John Radcliffe Hospital
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, Stati Uniti, 35233-1711
- University of Alabama - Children's of Alabama - Clinical Virology
-
Mobile, Alabama, Stati Uniti, 36604-3207
- University of South Alabama - Children's Specialty Clinic
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, Stati Uniti, 72202-3500
- Arkansas Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti, 90033-1075
- Los Angeles County - University of Southern California - Medical Center - Pediatrics
-
Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti, 90048-5970
- Plaza Towers Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Orange, California, Stati Uniti, 92868-3835
- Children's Hospital of Orange County - Infectious Diseases
-
Stanford, California, Stati Uniti, 94305-2200
- Stanford University School of Medicine
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, Stati Uniti, 80045-7106
- Children's Hospital Colorado - Infectious Disease
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, Stati Uniti, 20010-2916
- Children's National Medical Center - Sheikh Zayed Campus - Infectious Disease
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, Stati Uniti, 32209-6511
- University of Florida - College of Medicine - Jacksonville
-
Tampa, Florida, Stati Uniti, 33606-3438
- University of South Florida - Tampa General Hospital - Pediatrics
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, Stati Uniti, 30322-1014
- Emory Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, Stati Uniti, 40202-1821
- University of Louisville School of Medicine - Kosair Childrens Hospital - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, Stati Uniti, 70112-2600
- Tulane University - Tulane Medical Center - Pediatrics
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, Stati Uniti, 71103-4228
- Louisiana State University Health Shreveport - Pediatrics
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 21287-0011
- Johns Hopkins Children's Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, Stati Uniti, 02115-5711
- Children's Hospital Boston - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, Stati Uniti, 55455-0341
- University of Minnesota - Pediatric Infectious Disease
-
-
Mississippi
-
Jackson, Mississippi, Stati Uniti, 39216-4505
- University of Mississippi - Children's Infectious Diseases
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, Stati Uniti, 64108-4619
- Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics - Infectious Diseases
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, Stati Uniti, 63110-1010
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - Center for Clinical Studies
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, Stati Uniti, 68131-2137
- Creighton University Medical Center - Medicine - Infectious Diseases
-
-
New Jersey
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, Stati Uniti, 08901-1766
- Childrens Hospital at Saint Peters University Hospital - Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, Stati Uniti, 08901-1935
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School - Pediatrics
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo, New York, Stati Uniti, 14222-2006
- Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo - Infectious Diseases
-
Manhasset, New York, Stati Uniti, 11030-3816
- Cohen Children's Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
-
Rochester, New York, Stati Uniti, 14642-0001
- University of Rochester Medical Center - Golisano Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
-
Syracuse, New York, Stati Uniti, 13210-2342
- SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital - Pediatrics
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, Stati Uniti, 28203-5812
- Carolinas Medical Center - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44109-1998
- MetroHealth Medical Center - Pediatric Infectious Disease
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 44195-0001
- Cleveland Clinic Main Campus - Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases
-
Columbus, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 43205-2664
- Nationwide Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Stati Uniti, 15224-1529
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC - Pediatric Infectious Diseases
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, Stati Uniti, 02903-4923
- Rhode Island Hospital - Pediatrics
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, Stati Uniti, 29425-8903
- Medical University of South Carolina - Pediatrics - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, Stati Uniti, 37232-0011
- Vanderbilt University - Pediatric - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, Stati Uniti, 75235-7701
- Children's Medical Center Dallas - Neonatal ICU
-
Dallas, Texas, Stati Uniti, 75390-9063
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Pediatrics
-
Fort Worth, Texas, Stati Uniti, 76104-2710
- Cook Children's Infectious Disease Services
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, Stati Uniti, 84108-1457
- University of Utah - Pediatric Pharmacology Program
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, Stati Uniti, 98105-3901
- Seattle Children's Hospital - Infectious Diseases
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Non più vecchio di 1 mese (Bambino)
Accetta volontari sani
No
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Tutto
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed informed consent from parent(s) or legal guardian(s)
- Confirmation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) from urine or throat swab specimens by culture, shell vial, or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests
Symptomatic congenital CMV disease, as manifest by one or more of the following:
- Thrombocytopenia
- Petechiae
- Hepatomegaly
- Splenomegaly
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Hepatitis (elevated transaminases and/or bilirubin)
- Central nervous system (CNS) involvement of the CMV disease [such as microcephaly, radiographic abnormalities indicative of CMV CNS disease, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices for age, chorioretinitis, hearing deficits as detected by formal brainstem evoked response (not a screening auditory brainstem response {ABR}), and/or positive CMV PCR from CSF]
- Less than or equal to 30 days of age at study enrollment
- Weight at study enrollment greater than or equal to 1800 grams
- Gestational age greater than or equal to 32 weeks at birth
Exclusion Criteria:
- Imminent demise
- Patients receiving other antiviral agents or immune globulin
- Gastrointestinal abnormality which might preclude absorption of an oral medication (e.g., a history of necrotizing enterocolitis)
- Documented renal insufficiency, as noted by a creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min/1.73m^2 at time of study enrollment
- Breastfeeding from mother who is receiving ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, or maribivir
- Infants known to be born to women who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive (but HIV testing is not required for study entry)
- Current receipt of other investigational drugs
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Triplicare
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Valganciclovir
Six months of oral Valganciclovir.
|
Mono-valyl ester pro-drug of ganciclovir, oral solution, provided as a 12 grams of powder containing 5 grams of Valganciclovir free base.
The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: Providone K30, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, sodium saccharin, mannitol, flavor, and purified water.
|
|
Comparatore placebo: Placebo
Six weeks of oral Valganciclovir followed by placebo to complete the six month time period.
|
9 grams of powder which contains no Valganciclovir free base.
The oral solution formulation comprises the following excipients: mannitol, lactose anhydrous, fumaric acid, sodium benzoate, saccharin sodium, flavor, and purified water.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 6 Months.
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 6 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 6 months
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Events Which Lead to Permanent Discontinuation of Valganciclovir Therapy or Lead to Irreversible Outcome of the Adverse Event.
Lasso di tempo: baseline through 7 months
|
Adverse events were assessed at each visit through month 7 of the study.
No subject discontinued valganciclovir therapy due to permanent discontinuation of valganciclovir therapy or lead to irreversible outcome of any adverse event.
|
baseline through 7 months
|
|
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 12 Months.
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 12 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 12 months
|
|
Change in Best Ear Hearing Assessments at 24 Months.
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 24 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 24 months
|
|
Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 6 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 6 months
|
|
Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing in Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 12 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 12 months
|
|
Number of Ears With Improvement or Protected Hearing Assessments Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 24 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 24 months
|
|
Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 6 Months.(Based on 84 Ears From 43 Placebo Subjects and 82 Ears From 43 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 6 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 6 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 6 months
|
|
Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 12 Months.(Based on 77 Ears From 40 Placebo Subjects and 79 Ears From 41 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 12 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 12 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 12 months
|
|
Number of Ears With Hearing Deterioration Over Left and Right Ears at 24 Months.(Based on 58 Ears From 31 Placebo Subjects and 70 Ears From 37 Valganciclovir Subjects)
Lasso di tempo: Between baseline and 24 months
|
Hearing assessment was evaluated by an independent audiologist.
At baseline, a brainstem evoked response (BSER) assessment and autoacoustic emissions (OAEs) hearing assessments were obtained.
At 24 months, BSER and /or Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) and OAEs were obtained.
A single, independent study audiologist who was blinded to treatment assignment assessed the audiology test battery for each subject and assigned the classifications of normal hearing, mild hearing loss, moderate hearing loss, or severe hearing loss based upon their hearing thresholds (in decibels).
The classifications were assigned by ear (one for the left ear and one for the right ear), giving "total ear" classifications.
Following this, the study audiologist assigned the "best ear" classification for the subject at that study visit; for example, if a subject had mild hearing loss in their left ear and severe hearing loss in their right ear, then the "best ear" classification was mild hearing loss.
|
Between baseline and 24 months
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cogonitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Receptive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Age Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Fine Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Gross Motor Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 12 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 12 Months after enrollment
|
Motor Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
|
12 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Receptive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
|
Receptive Communication Scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor receptive communication skills) and 19 (excellent receptive communication skills), with the average receptive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
24 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Cognitive Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 months after enrollment
|
Cognitive Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores are between 40 (very poor cognitive skills) and 160 (excellent cognitive skills), with the average cognitive skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
|
24 months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Expressive Communication Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
|
Expressive Communication Scaled Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor expressive communication skills) and 19 (excellent expressive communication skills), with the average expressive communication skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
24 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurologic Impairment at 24 Months of Life Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Language Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
|
Language Composite Score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor language skills) and 160 (excellent language skills), with the average language skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
|
24 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Fine Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
|
Fine motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Scaled Scores, the range of scores is between 1 (very poor fine motor skills) and 19 (excellent fine motor skills), with the average fine motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
24 Months after enrollment
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Gross Motor Scaled Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment.
|
Gross motor scaled score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring is between 1 (very poor gross motor skills) and 19 (excellent gross motor skills), with the average gross motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 10 with standard deviation of 3.
|
24 Months after enrollment.
|
|
Neurological Impairment at 24 Months of Life, Utilizing the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Motor Composite Score).
Lasso di tempo: 24 Months after enrollment
|
Motor composite score for infants and toddlers was measured by use of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development.
For the Bayleys scoring of the Composite Scores, the range of scores is between 40 (very poor motor skills) and 160 (excellent motor skills), with the average motor skills score for a child (age adjusted) is 100 with standard deviation of 15.
|
24 Months after enrollment
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Pubblicazioni e link utili
La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
1 giugno 2008
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
1 dicembre 2011
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
1 giugno 2013
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
26 aprile 2007
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
26 aprile 2007
Primo Inserito (Stima)
27 aprile 2007
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)
26 agosto 2015
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
13 agosto 2015
Ultimo verificato
1 luglio 2015
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 06-0046
- CASG 112
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Valganciclovir
-
Luis Eduardo Morales BuenrostroCompletatoTrapianto di rene | Farmacocinetica | Infezioni da citomegalovirus | Equivalenza terapeuticaMessico
-
Stanford UniversityCompletatoSindrome dell'affaticamento cronicoStati Uniti
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Weill Medical College of Cornell University; University... e altri collaboratoriCompletato
-
Rabin Medical CenterCompletatoInfezione nei destinatari di trapianto di organi solidiIsraele
-
Dr. Ann C.T.M. VossenLeiden University Medical Center; Stichting Nuts OhraCompletatoPerdita dell'udito neurosensoriale | Infezione congenita da citomegalovirusOlanda
-
Karolinska InstitutetKarolinska University HospitalCompletatoGlioblastoma multiforme | Infezione da citomegalovirusSvezia
-
Hoffmann-La RocheCompletatoInfezioni da citomegalovirusSpagna, Francia, Germania, Messico, Stati Uniti, Australia, Canada
-
University of WashingtonHoffmann-La RocheCompletato
-
Duke UniversityRoche Pharma AGCompletatoInfezioni da citomegalovirusStati Uniti
-
University of California, San FranciscoRoche Pharma AGCompletatoInfezioni da HIV | Infezioni da citomegalovirusStati Uniti