Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Diversion Colitis
Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Via the Diverting Stoma Ameliorates Diversion Colitis in Patients With Temporary Ileostomy for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Endoscopic and Histopathological Assessment
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Stato
Condizioni
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Background and Rationale
Diversion colitis frequently develops after fecal stream diversion, affecting most patients whose intestinal continuity remains interrupted for more than three to six months. While stoma reversal is definitive, many patients require prolonged diversion due to adjuvant chemotherapy, poor general condition, or anastomotic healing concerns. Existing medical therapies-including short-chain fatty acid enemas, 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and probiotics-lack consistent efficacy in randomized trials. Gut microbiota dysbiosis is a central driver of DC; restoring a diverse microbial community via fecal microbiota transplantation represents a rational approach. Autologous FMT using the patient's own stoma effluent avoids pathogen transmission, donor screening, and ethical concerns. However, no prospective RCT has systematically evaluated auto-FMT for DC using endoscopic and histopathological endpoints.
Study Design
Single-center, prospective, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Participants
Adults aged 18-75 years with histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent low anterior resection with temporary loop ileostomy, scheduled for reversal at 3-6 months after primary surgery, and with endoscopic DC (modified Harig score ≥4 at week 4 post-ileostomy). Key exclusion criteria: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease, recent antibiotic or probiotic use, severe organ dysfunction, pregnancy, or lactation.
Interventions
Auto-FMT group: Daily irrigations of autologous fecal microbiota suspension for 4 weeks. Preparation: 50-80 g of fresh stool collected from the patient's stoma bag within 2 hours of passage, homogenized with 500 mL sterile normal saline (0.9% NaCl) pre-warmed to 37°C, stirred, and filtered through two layers of sterile gauze. The filtrate was used within 30 minutes. Irrigation: a 14-16 French Foley catheter inserted 10-15 cm into the efferent limb of the loop ileostomy; suspension infused by gravity drip over 5-10 minutes; patients retained the suspension for at least 30 minutes before evacuation.
Control group: Daily irrigations of 500 mL sterile normal saline (37°C) using the same catheter and technique, with the same retention time.
Outcome Measures
Primary outcomes: Change from baseline to week 4 in endoscopic score (modified Harig score, 0-12) and histopathological score (composite of mucosal atrophy, crypt distortion, and inflammatory infiltrate, 0-9), assessed by blinded reviewers.
Secondary outcomes: Wexner incontinence score at 1, 3, and 6 months after stoma reversal; quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29) at baseline, week 4, and 6 months post-reversal; serum hs-CRP, albumin, and fecal calprotectin at baseline and week 4; adverse events (CTCAE v5.0); treatment adherence (≥80% of 28 sessions).
Sample Size
33 patients per group (total 66) to detect a mean endoscopic score reduction difference of 1.5 points (assuming SD 2.0 in auto-FMT group and SD 1.8 in control group), 80% power, two-sided α = 0.05, accounting for a 20% dropout rate.
Statistical Analysis
Primary analysis was intention-to-treat. Change scores were analyzed using ANCOVA with baseline score as covariate. Secondary outcomes: Wexner scores with generalized estimating equations; quality of life with ANCOVA; biomarkers with Mann-Whitney U tests. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical Approval
The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Lin'an First People's Hospital, Hangzhou (Approval No.: Lin'an First People's Hospital Lun Yan Shen 2022 No.20, dated April 29, 2022). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki.
Tipo di studio
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Iscrizione
Fase
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Cina, 311300
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Lin'an District, Hangzhou
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto
- Adulto più anziano
Accetta volontari sani
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma.
- Low anterior resection with temporary loop ileostomy.
- Age 18-75 years.
- Scheduled for ileostomy reversal at 3-6 months after primary surgery.
- Endoscopic confirmation of diversion colitis at week 4 post-ileostomy (modified Harig score ≥4, range 0-12).
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
- Pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, or chronic constipation.
- Previous colorectal surgery (other than index surgery).
- Active infection requiring systemic antibiotics within 4 weeks before enrollment.
- Use of probiotics, prebiotics, or antibiotics within 4 weeks before enrollment.
- Severe organ dysfunction (Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease).
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Any condition precluding protocol compliance or outcome assessment.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Trattamento
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Separare
Numero di armi
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / ArmGruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / TrattamentoIntervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (auto-FMT)
Daily irrigations of autologous fecal microbiota suspension via the diverting stoma for 4 weeks.
Preparation: 50-80 g of fresh stool collected from the patient's stoma bag within 2 hours of passage, homogenized with 500 mL of sterile normal saline (0.9% NaCl) pre-warmed to 37 °C, stirred, and filtered through two layers of sterile gauze.
The filtrate is used within 30 minutes.
Irrigation: A 14-16 French Foley catheter inserted 10-15 cm into the efferent limb of the loop ileostomy, balloon inflated with 5-8 mL of air.
The suspension is infused by gravity drip (bag 40-50 cm above stoma) over 5-10 minutes.
Patients retain the suspension for at least 30 minutes before evacuation.
Vital signs are monitored for the first 3 days.
|
Daily irrigation of autologous fecal microbiota suspension via the diverting stoma for 4 weeks.
|
|
Altro: Saline Irrigation
Daily irrigations of 500 mL sterile normal saline (0.9% NaCl) pre-warmed to 37 °C via the diverting stoma for 4 weeks.
A 14-16 French Foley catheter is inserted 10-15 cm into the efferent limb of the loop ileostomy, and the balloon is inflated with 5-8 mL of air.
Saline is infused by gravity drip (bag 40-50 cm above stoma) over 5-10 minutes.
Patients retain the saline for at least 30 minutes before evacuation.
|
Daily irrigation of 500 mL sterile normal saline (0.9%) at 37°C via the diverting stoma, using the same catheter and technique as the auto-FMT group.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Endoscopic Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 4
|
Change from baseline to week 4 in modified Harig score (0-12), evaluating edema/erythema, loss of vascular pattern, friability/contact bleeding, and erosions/ulcerations (each 0-3).
Higher scores indicate more severe inflammation.
A blinded colorectal endoscopist performed colonoscopy through the stoma at week 0 and week 4.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
|
Change in Histopathological Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 4
|
Change from baseline to week 4 in composite histopathological score (0-9), assessing mucosal atrophy, crypt distortion, and inflammatory infiltrate (each 0-3).
The average score of two blinded gastrointestinal pathologists was used; disagreements (>2 points) were resolved by joint review.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Wexner Incontinence Score
Lasso di tempo: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6 post-reversal
|
Wexner incontinence score (0-20, where 0 = perfect continence, 20 = complete incontinence) assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months after stoma reversal.
|
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6 post-reversal
|
|
Quality of Life - EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Week 4, and Month 6 post-reversal
|
Global health status / quality of life score from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
|
Baseline, Week 4, and Month 6 post-reversal
|
|
Quality of Life - EORTC QLQ-CR29
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, Week 4, and Month 6 post-reversal
|
Disease-specific quality of life assessed by the EORTC QLQ-CR29 module, covering symptoms and functioning domains relevant to colorectal cancer patients.
|
Baseline, Week 4, and Month 6 post-reversal
|
|
Serum hs-CRP Level
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 4
|
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) measured in mg/L from serum samples.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
|
Serum Albumin Level
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 4
|
Albumin concentration measured in g/L from serum samples.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
|
Fecal Calprotectin Level
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and Week 4
|
Fecal calprotectin concentration measured by ELISA (μg/g), as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation.
|
Baseline and Week 4
|
|
Adverse Events and Treatment Adherence
Lasso di tempo: Throughout the 4-week intervention period for adverse events; at end of intervention for adherence
|
Adverse events graded according to CTCAE v5.0 (incidence, severity, and causality).
Treatment adherence defined as completion of ≥80% of 28 scheduled irrigation sessions.
|
Throughout the 4-week intervention period for adverse events; at end of intervention for adherence
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Sponsor
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Wang JW, Kuo CH, Kuo FC, Wang YK, Hsu WH, Yu FJ, Hu HM, Hsu PI, Wang JY, Wu DC. Fecal microbiota transplantation: Review and update. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Mar;118 Suppl 1:S23-S31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
- Sam SW, Hafeez B, Ong HI, Gill S, Smibert O, Lavelle A, Burgess A, Proud D, Mohan H. The impact of faecal diversion on the gut microbiome: a systematic review. Gut Microbiome (Camb). 2024 Feb 19;5:e4. doi: 10.1017/gmb.2024.1. eCollection 2024.
- Sohara N, Hagiwara S, Arai R, Iizuka H, Onozato Y, Kakizaki S. Can endoscopic submucosal dissection be safely performed in a smaller specialized clinic? World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):528-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.528.
- Vajn K, Suler D, Plunkett JA, Oudega M. Temporal profile of endogenous anatomical repair and functional recovery following spinal cord injury in adult zebrafish. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 26;9(8):e105857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105857. eCollection 2014.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento primario
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Primo Inserito
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 2022-YJ-020
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD
- STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
- CODICE_ANALITICO
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .