Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

The GranStone Trial

17 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Martin Blomberg Jensen

Prevention of Kidney Stones Due to Paraffin Oil Induced Granuloma: A Prospective Interventional Study

This study will investigate whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can reduce the risk of kidney stone formation in patients with paraffin disease, a condition caused by the injection of paraffin oil into muscle tissue for cosmetic muscle enlargement.

Paraffin disease can lead to chronic inflammation, disturbances in calcium regulation, high blood calcium levels, kidney stones, and impaired kidney function. Previous studies from Herlev-Gentofte Hospital have shown that kidney stones occur in nearly half of affected patients, while approximately one-third develop reduced kidney function. Current treatment primarily consists of high-dose corticosteroids, which can reduce blood calcium levels but cause substantial adverse effects and may not adequately control the underlying disease process.

Both empagliflozin and losartan are widely used medications with documented kidney-protective effects in other chronic kidney diseases. This randomized clinical trial will evaluate whether either treatment can prevent kidney stone formation and slow kidney-related complications in patients with paraffin disease.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can prevent kidney stone formation and improve kidney health in patients with paraffin disease.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Cosmetic treatments are becoming increasingly popular, now also encompassing injection of different sorts of fillers. One such approach is the injection of paraffin oil into muscular regions for the sole purpose of enhancing muscular size. During the last 4 years we have experienced that injections with paraffin oil are being more widely used than anticipated. Usage is mainly seen in the younger segment of the male Danish population, causing severe morbidity including hypercalcemia, kidney stones and renal failure in patients often in their thirties. Injected paraffin oil causes foreign body reactions, leading to inflammation and granuloma formation. Granulomas are rich in macrophages capable of producing large amount of activated vitamin D (1,25OH2D3) that may cause severe hypercalcemia. Although, the link between foreign body granuloma, and hypercalcemia has been known for more than 60 years sparse evidence-based treatments exist to control calcium and vitamin D balance in these patients. Physiologically, cutaneous produced or orally absorbed 25OH2D3 (cholecalciferol) needs activation before it can activate the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and exert its actions. This activation occurs through hydroxylation by CYP27B1 in the kidneys creating the active 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol). CYP27B1 is the rate-limiting step in calcitriol synthesis and is tightly regulated under physiologic conditions. Control of high 1,25(OH)2D3 is achieved by a feedback system, where 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates the enzyme CYP24A1, which in turn hy-droxylate 1,25(OH)2D3 to the inactive 1,24,25OH2D3. Several other players, e.g. parathy-roid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) regulate calcium homeostasis. However, in macrophages, CYP27B1 is upregulated by interleukin 2, and the inhibiting enzyme CYP24A1 is not upregulated. Therefore, granulomas can produce large amounts of 1,25OH2D3, and this production is not counteracted by the otherwise tight regulatory and physiological mechanisms. Unimpeded 1,25OH2D3 in turn increase calcium absorption from the intestines, reabsorption from the kidneys and to some extent calcium release from bones, all leading to hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia is a late feature of accelerated 25OH2D3 activation, as several counter regulatory mechanisms will attempt to maintain normocalcemia. As a result, these patients suffer from nephrolithiasis or progressive kidney disease due to nephrocalcinosis and/or nephrolithiasis, with some patients progressing to end stage renal dis-ease (ESRD).

SGLT2 inhibitors were developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes to lower blood glucose levels but they had a more pronounced effect in patients with heart or renal failure irrespective of diabetes status. SGLT2 inhibitors could prevent or reduce eGFR decline in patients with renal failure and it appeared in some trials that it could also lower the risk of nephrolithiasis. SGLT2 inhibitors have few adverse effects in non-diabetics and may be used to prevent progression of paraffin oil disease by protecting the kidney and reducing the risk of kidney stones in these patients. ACEi's and ARB's have also been shown to reduce progression of kidney disease. Although the data on prevention of kidney stones is less convincing for ACEi/ARB's the renoprotective effects make them a potential treatment option.

Data from our cohort of patients:

During our initial investigation of 88 patients, milder symptoms of hypercalcemia were often accompanied by hypercalcuria with increased risk of kidney stones and later nephrocalcinosis and ultimately progressive renal failure and vascular calcification as seen in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or CKD. 3 deaths have been recorded in our cohort of young men, so paraffin disease leads to significant morbidity, but presumably also increased mortality. Currently, paraffin disease is still very sparsely described in the medical literature. The number of affected individuals is presumably large because early disease causes few symptoms and many of these men rarely seek medical attention. At the section of Endocrinology at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, there is currently more than 310 young males who injected paraffin oil prior to referral. In the first published cohort of 88 males (32 ± 7 years (mean ± SD)) who injected paraffin oil 6 years prior to their first visit, the minority (42%) have managed to maintain an apparent normal calcium metabolism (normocalcemic and normoparathyoid), while the majority have developed an abnormal calcium metabolism ranging from normocalcemic and hypoparathyroid (24%) to hypercalcemic and hypoparathyroid (34%). Renal stone formers ranging from 22 % in patients with an apparent normal calcium homeostasis to a stunning 47-48% in those with abnormal calcium homeostasis (5-10% in back-ground population). Importantly, a significant number of patients (approx. 30%) had already developed mild to severe renal impairment with reduced eGFR. Most patients tended to have increased inflammatory markers (interleukine-2 receptor (IL-2R) and/or pepti-dyldipeptidase (ACE)) - even in those with apparent normal calcium metabolism. Surgical resection may improve both local reactions and pain. However, due to granuloma formation within muscle tissue and oilmigration, it is difficult to remove all the granuloma tissue. Currently, first line of treatment for paraffin disease is prednisolone, which has proven effective in lowering calcium levels in all our patients. However, patients require relatively large (15-75 mg daily) and long term (years) doses of prednisolone to achieve and maintain normal or near normal calcium levels with many possible adverse effects. Noteworthy, after 4 years observation we have not yet seen any decrease in inflammatory markers in any male suggesting that prednisolone monotherapy is not enough when you have large amount of granuloma tissue. Paraffin disease mimics sarcoidosis, both being granulomatous diseases with hypercalcemia due to macrophage mediated 25OH2D3 activation. Interestingly, RAAS activation has been shown to contribute to sarcoidosis granuloma formation in an ex vivo model, highlighting an additional potential role for treatment with ACEi/ARB's. However, paraffin disease appears to be much more progressive, not self-limiting and require more aggressive treatment probably because the volume of granulomatous tissue is so huge.

Since ACEi's, ARB's and SGLTi's are the only drug classes consistently shown to slow progression in CKD in a non-diabetic population, we hypothesize that these treatments will be effective in a cohort of patients with hypercalcemia due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease. Furthermore, we hypothesize that SGLTi will have a greater effect due to the potential decrease in incident nephrolithiasis. However, the ketosis associated with this treatment may not be beneficial, which clearly justifies the face-to-face comparison.

Losartan was chosen over an ACE inhibitor due to ease of administration and proven safety in patients with severe kidney disease. Additionally, it has been suggested that ARB's have greater efficacy than ACEi's on survival in patients with granulomatous disease due to sarcoidosis.

This research project will investigate whether it is of value to initiate nephroprotective treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ARB in patients with hypercalciuria due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

100

Fase

  • Fase 2
  • Fase 3

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

      • Herlev, Danimarca, 2730
        • Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Martin B Jensen, Professor
        • Sub-investigatore:
          • Emil B Wriedt, MD
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent by participant
  • Male
  • 18-70 years
  • Paraffin granuloma disease with hypercalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, hypercalciuria or a history of nephrolithiasis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • eGFR < 30 ml/min
  • Cancer (past or present, except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer), which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the results of the trial
  • Type 1 DM
  • Known chronic kidney disease in whom RAS-blockade and SGLT2-inhibition is indicated.
  • Severely impaired liver function
  • History of organ transplantation
  • Receiving therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ATII antagonist within 8 weeks prior to enrollment or previous intolerance of an SGLT2 inhibitor or ATII antagonist.
  • Known history of angioedema
  • Mental incapacity, language barriers or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol, which may preclude adequate understanding or cooperation during the trial, as judged by the investigator

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Empagliflozin
Once daily 25 mg tablet PO
Once daily 25 mg tablet PO
Comparatore attivo: Losartan
Once daily 100 mg tablet PO
Once daily 100 mg tablet PO

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Image verified new or increased nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis (from 0-24 months).
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months

The individual components of the composite outcome are defined as follows:

  • If nephrolithiasis- or nephrocalcinosis burden occurs after baseline or aggravates by more than 20% at follow-up it is counted as a positive outcome.
  • Any CT scans conducted as a part of a participant's routine medical care or hospital visits will also be used.
  • In the event that a participant undergoes more than 1 CT scan, it will be counted as a positive outcome if any of the scans shows nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis accord-ing to the criteria above.
  • Symptomatic kidney stone as defined as visible passage of a stone in the urine accom-panied by flank/groin/abdominal pain will also be counted as a positive outcome.
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months defined by either: 1A Change in p-Calcium ion concentration (mmol/L); 1B Change in p-PTH concen-tration (pmol/L); 1C Change in urine calcium excretion (mmol/L).
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m²)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in p-Creatinine (μmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in average daily prednisolone dosage (mg) based on cumulative average prednisolone dose.
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in inflammatory activity of the granulomas.
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in inflammatory activity evaluated by changes in p-IL-2R (kU/L) and p-ACE (U/L).
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in physical- and mental health scores assessed by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36).
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
The SF-36 consists of 36 questions designed to assess overall health status. Results are transformed onto a scale from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health).
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum albumin (g/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine albumin (mg/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in serum vitamin D metabolites
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in serum 25OHD, and 24,25(OH)2D3, and 1,25(OH)2D
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other indices of cardiac function as measured by transthoracic echocardiography.
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Incident or worsening signs of: Systolic- and/or diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, structural heart disease including valvular pathology
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in CT Hounsfield Units in the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in Coronary Artery Calcium Score on CT-scan
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score measured using the Agatston method on non-contrast cardiac CT; higher scores indicate greater coronary calcified plaque burden.
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Changes in self-reported kidney stones.
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in BUN (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum phosphate (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine phosphate (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum magnesium (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine magnesium (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum iron (µmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum ferritin (µg/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum FGF23 (ng/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in serum Klotho
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine Ka (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine Na (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine pH
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine citrate (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine oxalate (μmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine bicarbonate (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
Change in urine uric acid (mmol/L)
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Collaboratori

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Martin B Jensen, Professor, Herlev Hospital

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 marzo 2029

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 aprile 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

11 settembre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

17 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

18 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

18 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

17 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .