Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Cerebellar Brain Stimulation Plus Language Therapy for People at Risk of Poor Aphasia Recovery After Stroke (PART-CN)

27 ottobre 2026 aggiornato da: Johns Hopkins University

Predicting Aphasia Recovery and Testing Cerebellar Neuromodulation (PART-CN): A Pilot Wait-List Randomized Trial of Cathodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Computerized Language Therapy in Stroke Survivors Predicted to Have Poor Language Recovery

This pilot study tests whether a mild form of brain stimulation to the cerebellum, combined with computer-based language therapy, helps people recover language after a stroke when a poor natural recovery is predicted.

People already taking part in a Johns Hopkins study of stroke and language recovery, whose early data suggest the aphasia is unlikely to resolve without treatment, are invited about 3 months after the stroke. Half begin 15 treatment sessions right away and half begin about 3 months later. Each session pairs 25 minutes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right cerebellum with 45 to 60 minutes of language exercises, with a speech-language pathologist present.

The main question is whether language ability, measured with the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient, improves more by 6 months after stroke in the group treated first than in the group still waiting. The study also checks how accurately a machine learning model, built from data collected in the first days after stroke, predicted each person's language ability 12 months after stroke.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

About one third of people with aphasia after stroke respond poorly to language therapy, and current clinical tools cannot identify these individuals early, when recovery is steepest. This study pairs a recovery prediction model with a targeted treatment.

Aim 1: A machine learning model trained on acute-phase data from the parent longitudinal study (Johns Hopkins IRB NA_00042097; neuroimaging, cognitive-linguistic testing, demographics) predicts each participant's 12-month Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ). Participants predicted to remain below 93.8 (aphasia not expected to resolve) are eligible. Prediction accuracy is evaluated prospectively against observed 12-month scores (mean absolute error, correlation, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and F1 for the below-93.8 classification).

Aim 2: Eligible participants are randomized 1:1 to early intervention (treatment beginning about 3 months post-stroke) or wait-list control (usual care until about 6 months post-stroke, then the same treatment). Treatment is 15 sessions, up to 5 per week over about 3 to 5 weeks. In each session, cathodal tDCS (2 mA, 25 minutes; cathode over the right cerebellum, 1 cm below the inion and 4 cm lateral; anode over the right deltoid; Soterix Medical 1×1 device) is delivered during the first 25 minutes of 45 to 60 minutes of computer-delivered language therapy targeting picture naming, auditory comprehension, reading and spelling, with a speech-language pathologist present throughout. Sessions may take place at a Johns Hopkins site or at home with a study team member present.

The primary comparison is change in WAB-R AQ from baseline (about 3 months post-stroke) to 6 months post-stroke between the treated early group and the untreated wait-list group. Secondary measures include naming of trained items, discourse (content units and syllables per content unit in picture description), functional communication (Communication Activities of Daily Living, Third Edition), emotional well-being (General Health Questionnaire), quality of life (Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale), and resting-state functional connectivity measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Participants are followed to 12 months post-stroke.

As a pilot, the study is designed to show feasibility of the predict-then-intervene approach and to estimate effect sizes for a future fully powered, sham-controlled trial.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

8

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Manuel J Marte, PhD, CCC-SLP
  • Numero di telefono: 845-598-6911
  • Email: mmarte1@jh.edu

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 21287
        • The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Phipps Building
        • Contatto:
          • Manuel J Marte, PhD, CCC-SLP
          • Numero di telefono: 845-598-6911
          • Email: mmarte1@jh.edu

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in the Johns Hopkins longitudinal stroke and aphasia study (IRB NA_00042097)
  • Consented to future contact for research studies
  • Predicted to have poor language recovery from acute-phase data, defined as a predicted Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient below 93.8 at 12 months post-stroke
  • Ischemic left hemisphere stroke
  • Aphasia with naming impairment on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised
  • Approaching 3 months post-stroke at enrollment
  • Fluent speaker of English by self-report
  • Age 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesion in the right cerebellum
  • Previous neurological disorder other than stroke affecting the brain, or any neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorder
  • Seizures during the previous 6 months
  • Uncorrected visual or hearing loss by self-report
  • Use of medications that lower the seizure threshold (e.g., methylphenidate)
  • Use of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (e.g., memantine)
  • History of brain surgery or any metal in the head
  • Severely impaired auditory comprehension (below 2 on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Auditory Verbal Comprehension sub-score)
  • Severely limited verbal output (below 2 on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Spontaneous Speech rating)

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Early intervention

15 sessions of cathodal right cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; 2 mA, 25 minutes) during computerized language therapy (45 to 60 minutes per session, with a speech-language pathologist present), up to 5 sessions per week over about 3 to 5 weeks, beginning about 3 months post-stroke.

Cathode (saline-soaked sponge electrode) over the right cerebellum, 1 cm below the inion and 4 cm lateral; anode over the right deltoid. Constant current of 2 mA for 25 minutes, ramped up over the first 15 seconds, from a battery-powered Soterix Medical 1x1 stimulator with pre-programmed parameters. Delivered during the first 25 minutes of each language therapy session.

Altri nomi:
  • tDCS
  • Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS

Computer-delivered language exercises on a tablet, targeting spoken and written picture naming, auditory comprehension, reading and spelling, 45 to 60 minutes per session, with difficulty adjusted to performance and a speech-language pathologist present. Each participant uses the same delivery platform for all sessions.

Altri nomi:
  • Computer-delivered naming treatment
Altro: Wait-list control (delayed intervention)

Usual care, which may include outpatient speech-language therapy, from about 3 to 6 months post-stroke; then the same 15-session protocol of cathodal right cerebellar tDCS plus computerized language therapy, beginning about 6 months post-stroke.

Cathode (saline-soaked sponge electrode) over the right cerebellum, 1 cm below the inion and 4 cm lateral; anode over the right deltoid. Constant current of 2 mA for 25 minutes, ramped up over the first 15 seconds, from a battery-powered Soterix Medical 1x1 stimulator with pre-programmed parameters. Delivered during the first 25 minutes of each language therapy session.

Altri nomi:
  • tDCS
  • Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS

Computer-delivered language exercises on a tablet, targeting spoken and written picture naming, auditory comprehension, reading and spelling, 45 to 60 minutes per session, with difficulty adjusted to performance and a speech-language pathologist present. Each participant uses the same delivery platform for all sessions.

Altri nomi:
  • Computer-delivered naming treatment

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The WAB-R AQ is a composite measure of overall language impairment, with scores ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate milder aphasia (better outcome). Change from baseline to 6 months post-stroke is compared between the early intervention group (after treatment) and the wait-list group (before treatment).

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Mean Absolute Error Between Predicted and Observed 12-Month Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient
Lasso di tempo: 12 months post-stroke

Mean absolute difference, in WAB-R AQ points (scale 0 to 100), between the machine learning model's predicted 12-month Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (generated from acute-phase data) and the observed 12-month score. Lower values indicate more accurate prediction.

12 months post-stroke

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Treatment Items Produced Correctly
Lasso di tempo: During treatment, up to one week post final treatment session (about 4 to 6 weeks after treatment starts)

Percentage of items trained during treatment that are produced correctly, scored 0 to 100%; higher values indicate better performance.

During treatment, up to one week post final treatment session (about 4 to 6 weeks after treatment starts)
Change in Number of Content Units in Picture Description
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

Total number of content units (accurate, relevant pieces of information) produced when describing the Modern Cookie Theft picture and the Precarious Painter picture. Higher values indicate more informative discourse.

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Syllables per Content Unit in Picture Description
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

Number of syllables produced per content unit in the same picture descriptions

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Communication Activities of Daily Living, Third Edition (CADL-3) Total Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The Communication Activities of Daily Living, Third Edition measures everyday functional communication in people with aphasia. Total raw score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better functional communication.

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) Total Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The General Health Questionnaire (Goldberg and Hillier) measures psychological distress and emotional well-being. Items are rated using 0 to 3 Likert scale, giving a total score from 0 to 84; higher scores indicate greater psychological distress (worse outcome).

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) Mean Score
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke

The Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 measures health-related quality of life after stroke and aphasia. Mean score ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke) and 6 months post-stroke
Change in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Between Cortical Language Regions and the Right Cerebellum
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke), 6 months, and 9 months post-stroke

Resting-state functional connectivity (correlation coefficient of oxygenated hemoglobin signals) between cortical language regions and the right cerebellum, measured with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Higher values indicate stronger connectivity.

Baseline (approximately 3 months post-stroke), 6 months, and 9 months post-stroke

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) at 9 Months Post-Stroke
Lasso di tempo: 9 months post-stroke

The WAB-R AQ is a composite measure of overall language impairment (range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate milder aphasia). Compared between groups to explore the effect of treatment timing (treatment starting about 3 versus 6 months post-stroke).

9 months post-stroke
Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ) at 12 Months Post-Stroke
Lasso di tempo: 12 months post-stroke

The WAB-R AQ is a composite measure of overall language impairment (range 0 to 100; higher scores indicate milder aphasia). Used to assess durability of treatment effects in all participants.

12 months post-stroke

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Collaboratori

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Melissa D Stockbridge, PhD, CCC-SLP, Johns Hopkins University

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 novembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 giugno 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 giugno 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

27 ottobre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

27 ottobre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

3 novembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

3 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

27 ottobre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 ottobre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • IRB00562650
  • 2T32HD007414-31 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared outside Johns Hopkins. Data collected in this study are coded protected health information under the approved protocol and consent. Aggregate results will be published.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

Sì

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .