術後歯痛におけるアセトアミノフェン/ナプロキセンナトリウム固定配合剤、アセトアミノフェンおよびナプロキセンナトリウムの研究
術後の歯痛におけるアセトアミノフェン/ナプロキセンナトリウム固定配合剤、アセトアミノフェン、およびナプロキセンナトリウムの完全要因、無作為化、二重盲検、プラセボ対照、並行群、単回投与の有効性および安全性研究
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well a fixed combination of acetaminophen/naproxen sodium relieves postoperative dental pain compared with acetaminophen, naproxen sodium and placebo.
調査の概要
状態
条件
詳細な説明
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose full-factorial study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of acetaminophen and naproxen sodium, compared with acetaminophen or naproxen sodium alone, and placebo following surgical extraction of three or four third molars.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- フェーズ 3
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City、Utah、アメリカ、84107
- JBR Clinical Research LLC
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Weigh 100 pounds or greater and have a body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.4 (inclusive) at screening
- Surgical removal of three or four third molars, of which, two must be mandibular impactions
- Meets requirements for post-surgical pain level
- Females of childbearing potential and males agree to contraceptive requirements of study
- Have a negative urine drug screen at screening, and on day of surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant female, breastfeeding, trying to become pregnant or male with pregnant partner or partner currently trying to become pregnant
- Have a known allergy or hypersensitivity to naproxen (or other NSAIDs including aspirin) or to acetaminophen, oxycodone or other opioids
- Not able to swallow whole large tablets or capsules
- History of any condition(s) in investigator's opinion, may jeopardize subject safety, well-being and integrity of study
- Use analgesics 5 or more times per week
- History of chronic tranquilizer use, heavy drinking, or substance abuse, as judged by the investigator site staff, in the last 5 years
- Use any immunosuppressive drugs within 2 weeks of surgical procedure
- History of endoscopically documented peptic ulcer disease or bleeding disorder in the last 2 years
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：階乗代入
- マスキング：ダブル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium Fixed Combination
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium Fixed Combination tablets. |
Fixed combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium will be administered orally. |
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Naproxen Sodium
Participants will receive a single oral dose of one Naproxen Sodium tablet with one Placebo capsule. |
Placebo will be administered orally. Naproxen Sodium will be administered orally. |
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Acetaminophen
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Acetaminophen tablets. |
Acetaminophen will be administered orally. |
|
プラセボコンパレーター：Placebo
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Placebo capsules. |
Placebo will be administered orally. |
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference From 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing (SPID 0-12)
時間枠：Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
|
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores were calculated using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) collected at each scheduled timepoint within the specified timeframe. The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity at that time point from the baseline pain intensity. The SPID scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous timepoint and adding these time weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0-12 hours. PID is ranging from 0 to 10 point and SPID 0-12 ranging from 0 to 120. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. |
Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference From 6 to 12 Hours (SPID 6-12)
時間枠：From 6 to 12 hours
|
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores were calculated using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) collected at each scheduled timepoint within the specified timeframe. The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity at that time point from the baseline pain intensity. The SPID scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous timepoint and adding these time weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 6-12 hours. PID is ranging from 0 to 10 point and SPID6-12 ranging from 0 to 60. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. |
From 6 to 12 hours
|
|
Time to First Request of Rescue Analgesic
時間枠：0 to 24 hours
|
Time to first request for rescue medication was measured as the elapsed time from when investigational product (IP) was given until the time rescue medication was first requested. |
0 to 24 hours
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Who Request Rescue Analgesic During the First 12 Hours
時間枠：Up to 12 hours
|
Proportion of participants who requested rescue analgesic during the first 12 hours was reported. |
Up to 12 hours
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- スタディディレクター：Marsha Tharakan, MD, DDS、Kenvue Brands LLC
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
- Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Ballantyne JC, Burke LB, Carragee E, Cowan P, Croll S, Dionne RA, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Gordon DB, Iyengar S, Jay GW, Kalso EA, Kerns RD, McDermott MP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Royal MA, Segerdahl M, Stauffer JW, Todd KH, Vanhove GF, Wallace MS, West C, White RE, Wu C. Research design considerations for single-dose analgesic clinical trials in acute pain: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2016 Feb;157(2):288-301. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000375.
- Pickering G, Loriot MA, Libert F, Eschalier A, Beaune P, Dubray C. Analgesic effect of acetaminophen in humans: first evidence of a central serotonergic mechanism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;79(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.12.307.
- Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ. The value of the dental impaction pain model in drug development. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:175-90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_15.
- GUZMAN F, BRAUN C, LIM RK, POTTER GD, RODGERS DW. NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC ANALGESICS WHICH BLOCK VISCERAL PAIN EVOKED BY INTRA-ARTERIAL INJECTION OF BRADYKININ AND OTHER ALGESIC AGENTS. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 Jun 1;149:571-88. No abstract available.
- LIM RK, GUZMAN F, RODGERS DW, GOTO K, BRAUN C, DICKERSON GD, ENGLE RJ. SITE OF ACTION OF NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC ANALGESICS DETERMINED BY BLOCKING BRADYKININ-EVOKED VISCERAL PAIN. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 Nov 1;152:25-58. No abstract available.
- Aronoff DM, Oates JA, Boutaud O. New insights into the mechanism of action of acetaminophen: Its clinical pharmacologic characteristics reflect its inhibition of the two prostaglandin H2 synthases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan;79(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.09.009. No abstract available.
- Mallet C, Daulhac L, Bonnefont J, Ledent C, Etienne M, Chapuy E, Libert F, Eschalier A. Endocannabinoid and serotonergic systems are needed for acetaminophen-induced analgesia. Pain. 2008 Sep 30;139(1):190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.030. Epub 2008 May 15.
- Koch-Weser J. Drug therapy. Acetaminophen. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 2;295(23):1297-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197612022952306. No abstract available.
- Milton AS. Modern views on the pathogenesis of fever and the mode of action of antipyretic drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;28(4 SUPPL):393-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1976.tb04186.x. No abstract available.
- Ameer B, Greenblatt DJ. Acetaminophen. Ann Intern Med. 1977 Aug;87(2):202-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-87-2-202.
- Product Monograph for Aleve (Naproxen Sodium Tablets USP/Liquid Gels/Capsules 220 mg). Bayer Inc. Consumer Care. Revised 8 January 2015
- Todd PA, Clissold SP. Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs. 1990 Jul;40(1):91-137. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040010-00006.
- Davies NM, Anderson KE. Clinical pharmacokinetics of naproxen. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Apr;32(4):268-93. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732040-00002.
- Lipkovich I, Ratitch B, O'Kelly M. Sensitivity to censored-at-random assumption in the analysis of time-to-event endpoints. Pharm Stat. 2016 May;15(3):216-29. doi: 10.1002/pst.1738. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
- Cheung R, Krishnaswami S, Kowalski K. Analgesic efficacy of celecoxib in postoperative oral surgery pain: a single-dose, two-center, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2498-510. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.008.
- Fricke J, Davis N, Yu V, Krammer G. Lumiracoxib 400 mg compared with celecoxib 400 mg and placebo for treating pain following dental surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
- Clinical Study Report CCSPAA001068. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and activecontrolled, proof of concept study to evaluate two strengths of concomitantly dosed naproxen sodium with acetaminophen, compared with naproxen sodium, hydrocodone/acetaminophen and placebo in postoperative dental pain.: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., May 2019.
- Clinical Study Report CCSPAA002398. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Five Strengths of a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Postoperative Dental Pain.: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., November 2020.
- 21 CFR § 300.50 - Fixed-combination prescription drugs for humans, 40 FR 13496, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 64 FR 401, Jan. 5, 1999.
- Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- CCSPAA005199
- CCSPAA005199 (その他の助成金/資金番号：Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (JJCI))
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。