对乙酰氨基酚/萘普生钠固定组合、对乙酰氨基酚和萘普生钠在术后牙痛中的研究
对乙酰氨基酚/萘普生钠固定组合、对乙酰氨基酚和萘普生钠在术后牙痛中的全因子、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、单剂量疗效和安全性研究
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well a fixed combination of acetaminophen/naproxen sodium relieves postoperative dental pain compared with acetaminophen, naproxen sodium and placebo.
研究概览
地位
条件
详细说明
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose full-factorial study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of acetaminophen and naproxen sodium, compared with acetaminophen or naproxen sodium alone, and placebo following surgical extraction of three or four third molars.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 第三阶段
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City、Utah、美国、84107
- JBR Clinical Research LLC
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Weigh 100 pounds or greater and have a body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.4 (inclusive) at screening
- Surgical removal of three or four third molars, of which, two must be mandibular impactions
- Meets requirements for post-surgical pain level
- Females of childbearing potential and males agree to contraceptive requirements of study
- Have a negative urine drug screen at screening, and on day of surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant female, breastfeeding, trying to become pregnant or male with pregnant partner or partner currently trying to become pregnant
- Have a known allergy or hypersensitivity to naproxen (or other NSAIDs including aspirin) or to acetaminophen, oxycodone or other opioids
- Not able to swallow whole large tablets or capsules
- History of any condition(s) in investigator's opinion, may jeopardize subject safety, well-being and integrity of study
- Use analgesics 5 or more times per week
- History of chronic tranquilizer use, heavy drinking, or substance abuse, as judged by the investigator site staff, in the last 5 years
- Use any immunosuppressive drugs within 2 weeks of surgical procedure
- History of endoscopically documented peptic ulcer disease or bleeding disorder in the last 2 years
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：阶乘赋值
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium Fixed Combination
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium Fixed Combination tablets. |
Fixed combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium will be administered orally. |
|
有源比较器：Naproxen Sodium
Participants will receive a single oral dose of one Naproxen Sodium tablet with one Placebo capsule. |
Placebo will be administered orally. Naproxen Sodium will be administered orally. |
|
有源比较器：Acetaminophen
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Acetaminophen tablets. |
Acetaminophen will be administered orally. |
|
安慰剂比较：Placebo
Participants will receive a single oral dose of two Placebo capsules. |
Placebo will be administered orally. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference From 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing (SPID 0-12)
大体时间：Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
|
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores were calculated using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) collected at each scheduled timepoint within the specified timeframe. The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity at that time point from the baseline pain intensity. The SPID scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous timepoint and adding these time weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 0-12 hours. PID is ranging from 0 to 10 point and SPID 0-12 ranging from 0 to 120. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. |
Baseline (0 hour) up to 12 hours post-dose
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference From 6 to 12 Hours (SPID 6-12)
大体时间：From 6 to 12 hours
|
Time-weighted sum of the pain intensity difference (SPID) scores were calculated using a Pain Intensity-Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) ranging from 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain) collected at each scheduled timepoint within the specified timeframe. The Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at each time point was derived by subtracting the pain intensity at that time point from the baseline pain intensity. The SPID scores were derived by first multiplying each PID score by the time from the previous timepoint and adding these time weighted PID scores together over the intervals from 6-12 hours. PID is ranging from 0 to 10 point and SPID6-12 ranging from 0 to 60. A higher value of SPID indicated greater pain relief. |
From 6 to 12 hours
|
|
Time to First Request of Rescue Analgesic
大体时间：0 to 24 hours
|
Time to first request for rescue medication was measured as the elapsed time from when investigational product (IP) was given until the time rescue medication was first requested. |
0 to 24 hours
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Who Request Rescue Analgesic During the First 12 Hours
大体时间：Up to 12 hours
|
Proportion of participants who requested rescue analgesic during the first 12 hours was reported. |
Up to 12 hours
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 研究主任：Marsha Tharakan, MD, DDS、Kenvue Brands LLC
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
- Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Ballantyne JC, Burke LB, Carragee E, Cowan P, Croll S, Dionne RA, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Gordon DB, Iyengar S, Jay GW, Kalso EA, Kerns RD, McDermott MP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Royal MA, Segerdahl M, Stauffer JW, Todd KH, Vanhove GF, Wallace MS, West C, White RE, Wu C. Research design considerations for single-dose analgesic clinical trials in acute pain: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2016 Feb;157(2):288-301. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000375.
- Pickering G, Loriot MA, Libert F, Eschalier A, Beaune P, Dubray C. Analgesic effect of acetaminophen in humans: first evidence of a central serotonergic mechanism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;79(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.12.307.
- Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ. The value of the dental impaction pain model in drug development. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:175-90. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-323-7_15.
- GUZMAN F, BRAUN C, LIM RK, POTTER GD, RODGERS DW. NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC ANALGESICS WHICH BLOCK VISCERAL PAIN EVOKED BY INTRA-ARTERIAL INJECTION OF BRADYKININ AND OTHER ALGESIC AGENTS. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 Jun 1;149:571-88. No abstract available.
- LIM RK, GUZMAN F, RODGERS DW, GOTO K, BRAUN C, DICKERSON GD, ENGLE RJ. SITE OF ACTION OF NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC ANALGESICS DETERMINED BY BLOCKING BRADYKININ-EVOKED VISCERAL PAIN. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1964 Nov 1;152:25-58. No abstract available.
- Aronoff DM, Oates JA, Boutaud O. New insights into the mechanism of action of acetaminophen: Its clinical pharmacologic characteristics reflect its inhibition of the two prostaglandin H2 synthases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan;79(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.09.009. No abstract available.
- Mallet C, Daulhac L, Bonnefont J, Ledent C, Etienne M, Chapuy E, Libert F, Eschalier A. Endocannabinoid and serotonergic systems are needed for acetaminophen-induced analgesia. Pain. 2008 Sep 30;139(1):190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.030. Epub 2008 May 15.
- Koch-Weser J. Drug therapy. Acetaminophen. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 2;295(23):1297-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197612022952306. No abstract available.
- Milton AS. Modern views on the pathogenesis of fever and the mode of action of antipyretic drugs. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;28(4 SUPPL):393-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1976.tb04186.x. No abstract available.
- Ameer B, Greenblatt DJ. Acetaminophen. Ann Intern Med. 1977 Aug;87(2):202-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-87-2-202.
- Product Monograph for Aleve (Naproxen Sodium Tablets USP/Liquid Gels/Capsules 220 mg). Bayer Inc. Consumer Care. Revised 8 January 2015
- Todd PA, Clissold SP. Naproxen. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and pain states. Drugs. 1990 Jul;40(1):91-137. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040010-00006.
- Davies NM, Anderson KE. Clinical pharmacokinetics of naproxen. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Apr;32(4):268-93. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199732040-00002.
- Lipkovich I, Ratitch B, O'Kelly M. Sensitivity to censored-at-random assumption in the analysis of time-to-event endpoints. Pharm Stat. 2016 May;15(3):216-29. doi: 10.1002/pst.1738. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
- Cheung R, Krishnaswami S, Kowalski K. Analgesic efficacy of celecoxib in postoperative oral surgery pain: a single-dose, two-center, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2498-510. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.008.
- Fricke J, Davis N, Yu V, Krammer G. Lumiracoxib 400 mg compared with celecoxib 400 mg and placebo for treating pain following dental surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain. 2008 Jan;9(1):20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
- Clinical Study Report CCSPAA001068. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and activecontrolled, proof of concept study to evaluate two strengths of concomitantly dosed naproxen sodium with acetaminophen, compared with naproxen sodium, hydrocodone/acetaminophen and placebo in postoperative dental pain.: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., May 2019.
- Clinical Study Report CCSPAA002398. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Five Strengths of a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Postoperative Dental Pain.: Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., November 2020.
- 21 CFR § 300.50 - Fixed-combination prescription drugs for humans, 40 FR 13496, Mar. 27, 1975, as amended at 64 FR 401, Jan. 5, 1999.
- Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- CCSPAA005199
- CCSPAA005199 (其他赠款/资助编号：Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (JJCI))
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
IPD 计划说明
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.