이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Reliability and Reproducibility of CT-Based Facet Joint Measurements in Patients With AOSpine Type A2, A3, and A4 Thoracolumbar Fractures (REFACT)

2026년 7월 13일 업데이트: Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD, Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care

The Reliability Evaluation of Facet joint Assessment by Computed Tomography in thoracolumbar fractures (REFACT) study aims to evaluate how consistently different specialists assess thoracolumbar facet joints on computed tomography (CT) images in patients with AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4 thoracolumbar fractures.

The main questions are:

  • How consistently do different raters classify facet joint degeneration using the Pathria grading system?
  • How consistently do different raters measure facet joint angle and mean facet joint space width on CT images?
  • How reproducible are these assessments when the same rater repeats the measurements after a one-month interval?

The study will use anonymized retrospective CT DICOM datasets obtained from the institutional imaging archive. Six independent raters (three neurosurgeons and three radiology specialists) will evaluate the same CT datasets using a standardized measurement protocol. Each rater will perform two independent assessment rounds separated by a one-month washout period. The results will be used to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of qualitative and quantitative CT-based facet joint assessment methods.

연구 개요

상태

아직 모집하지 않음

정황

개입 / 치료

상세 설명

The Reliability Evaluation of Facet joint Assessment by Computed Tomography in thoracolumbar fractures (REFACT) study is an imaging-based, multirater reliability study designed to evaluate the reproducibility of computed tomography-based assessment of thoracolumbar facet joints.

The study represents the methodological stage of a broader research program investigating longitudinal degenerative changes in the facet joints after surgical or conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Before changes in facet joint morphology can be interpreted over time, the reliability of the imaging assessment methods must first be established in the target patient population.

Anonymized CT DICOM datasets will be selected from the institutional imaging archive of the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine. The datasets will include patients with AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4 thoracolumbar junction fractures and will cover the anatomical levels required for standardized facet joint assessment. No additional imaging, patient contact, study-specific treatment, or prospective clinical intervention will be performed.

Six independent raters will participate in the study: three neurosurgeons and three specialists in radiology or CT imaging. All raters will use the same standardized assessment protocol and the same DICOM viewing software.

Before the formal assessment, the raters will participate in a joint training session using one representative anonymized CT dataset that will not be included in the main analysis. The session will be used to demonstrate the assessment procedure, standardize image orientation and vertebral level identification, clarify the interpretation of the Pathria grading system, and review the procedures for measuring facet joint angle and facet joint space width. Any ambiguities in the assessment instructions will be resolved before the formal study begins.

During the first assessment round, each rater will independently evaluate the same anonymized CT datasets. The order of the datasets will be randomized separately for each rater. Raters will record the Pathria grade of facet joint degeneration and quantitative facet joint measurements according to the standardized protocol.

After a one-month washout interval, the same CT datasets will be re-randomized and reassessed independently by the same six raters during a second assessment round. The changed order and washout period are intended to reduce recall bias and allow evaluation of the reproducibility of repeated assessments by the same rater.

Throughout both assessment rounds, raters will be blinded to patient identifiers, clinical information, previous measurements, and the assessments of the other raters. Raters will not discuss individual study cases or measurement decisions until both rounds have been completed.

The study will evaluate agreement across different raters and the consistency of repeated assessments by the same rater. The assessment will include both ordinal grading of facet joint degeneration and continuous morphometric measurements. Exploratory analyses may examine whether reliability differs according to rater specialty, vertebral level, or anatomical side.

All study data will be entered into a standardized data collection form and stored in a restricted-access institutional database. Missing, technically inadequate, or non-evaluable assessments will not be imputed and will be reported descriptively.

Because the study uses only previously acquired, anonymized imaging data, participants will not undergo any study-related procedures and will not be exposed to additional radiation or treatment-related risk.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (추정된)

12

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

연구 장소

      • Moscow, 러시아 제국, 129090
        • Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Andrey Grin, MD, PhD
        • 연락하다:
          • Vasiliy Karanadze, MD, PhD
          • 전화번호: +7 (495) 280-15-61
          • 이메일: sklif@zdrav.mos.ru
        • 부수사관:
          • Aleksandr Talypov, MD, PhD
        • 부수사관:
          • Anton Kordonsky, MD, PhD
        • 부수사관:
          • Vasily Karandze, MD, PhD
        • 부수사관:
          • Ivan Lvov, MD, PhD
        • 부수사관:
          • Mikhail Kucherov, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Rinat Abdrafiev, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Aleksandr Tupikin, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Ksenia Dmitrenko, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Maria Nanoyan, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Olga Minkina, MD
        • 부수사관:
          • Layla Khamidova, MD, PhD
        • 부수사관:
          • Roman Elokhovskiy, MD, PhD

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인
  • 고령자

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

The study population will consist of patients aged 18 to 50 years with AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4 thoracolumbar fractures whose previously acquired CT examinations are available in the institutional imaging archive. Eligible CT datasets must cover vertebral levels T9 through L3 and be suitable for standardized facet joint assessment. The study will use anonymized retrospective imaging data only; there will be no direct patient recruitment, additional imaging, treatment allocation, or other study-specific intervention. CT datasets will be selected according to predefined eligibility criteria until at least 142 evaluable facet joints are available for analysis.

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient age from 18 to 50 years;
  • thoracolumbar fracture classified as AOSpine type A2, A3, or A4;
  • availability of CT images covering vertebral levels from Th9 to L3;
  • absence of imaging artifacts at the levels planned for assessment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • bone density of the thoracolumbar junction vertebrae below 100 HU;
  • systemic bone or joint disorders associated with changes in the FJs or intervertebral discs, including diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, or other comparable conditions;
  • previous spinal surgery, including procedures performed without implants;
  • fractures with distraction or translational injury of the posterior supporting column.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

코호트 및 개입

그룹/코호트
개입 / 치료
CT Image Review Cohort
Anonymized CT scans of the thoracolumbar spine (T9-L3) obtained from eligible patients aged 18 to 65 years and reviewed independently by six raters to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reproducibility of CT-based evaluation of facet joint and intervertebral disc degenerative changes
Independent review of anonymized thoracolumbar CT scans by six raters for assessment of degenerative changes in facet joints and intervertebral discs using the Pathria scale, as well as measurement of facet joint space width and angulation.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Interobserver Reliability of CT-Based Pathria Grading Scale for Facet Joint Degenerative Changes
기간: At baseline CT image review
Interobserver agreement for grading facet joint degenerative changes on thoracolumbar CT scans using the 4-grade Pathria classification, assessed by Fleiss' kappa across six raters.
At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of facet joint angulation measurements
기간: At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of measurement of facet joint angulation in the axial plane on thoracolumbar CT scans, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of facet joint space width measurements
기간: At baseline CT image review
Interobserver reliability of quantitative measurement of mean facet joint space width assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline CT image review

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Intraobserver Reliability of CT-Based Pathria Grading Scale for Facet Joint Degenerative Changes
기간: At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver agreement for grading facet joint degenerative changes on thoracolumbar CT scans using the 4-grade Pathria classification, assessed on repeated review.
At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of facet joint angulation measurements
기간: At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of repeated measurement of facet joint angulation in the axial plane on thoracolumbar CT scans, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of facet joint space width measurements
기간: At baseline and 1 month later
Intraobserver reliability of repeated quantitative measurement of mean facet joint space width, assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
At baseline and 1 month later

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 8월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2026년 11월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2026년 12월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 6월 16일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 6월 22일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 6월 25일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 15일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 13일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • SKL052026

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .