이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

2017년 5월 2일 업데이트: Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

A 12-Month, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone audiometry, and concomitant medication usage.

연구 개요

상태

완전한

정황

상세 설명

This was a Phase 3, open-label, nonrandomized study that consisted of a screening period, an open label titration period, and a 52 week, long term, open-label treatment period in patients with chronic pain. Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had completed study C33237/3079 (NCT01240863) (these patients are hereafter referred to as rollover patients) or if they had not participated in study 3079 (these patients are hereafter referred to as either new opioid naïve or new opioid experienced patients).

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

330

단계

  • 3단계

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, 미국
        • Horizon Research Group, LLC
    • California
      • Anaheim, California, 미국
        • Physician Alliance Research Center
      • Beverly Hills, California, 미국
        • Adam D. Karns, MD
      • Buena Park, California, 미국
        • Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.
      • Burbank, California, 미국
        • Providence Clinical Research
      • Fresno, California, 미국
        • Research Center of Fresno, Inc.
      • Laguna Hills, California, 미국
        • Pacific Coast Pain Management Center
      • Laguna Hills, California, 미국
        • South Orange County Surgical Medical Group
      • San Diego, California, 미국
        • Accelovance, Inc.
      • Valley Village, California, 미국
        • Bayview Research Group, LLC
    • Florida
      • Clearwater, Florida, 미국
        • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
      • DeLand, Florida, 미국
        • Avail Clinical Research, LLC
      • Orlando, Florida, 미국
        • Compass Research, LLC
      • Sarasota, Florida, 미국
        • Sarasota Pain Medicine Research LLC
      • Weston, Florida, 미국
        • Gold Coast Research LLC
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, 미국
        • Drug Studies America
      • Marietta, Georgia, 미국
        • Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
      • Marietta, Georgia, 미국
        • Taylor Research, LLC
      • Newnan, Georgia, 미국
        • Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, 미국
        • Millennium Pain Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, 미국
        • Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, 미국
        • International Clinical Research, Inc.
    • Kentucky
      • Crestview Hills, Kentucky, 미국
        • Community Research
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, 미국
        • Willis Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center
    • Maryland
      • Pikesville, Maryland, 미국
        • MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Brockton, Massachusetts, 미국
        • Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
    • Missouri
      • Florissant, Missouri, 미국
        • HealthCare Research
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, 미국
        • Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, 미국
        • Meridian Clinical Research
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, 미국
        • Clinical Research Center of Nevada
    • New Jersey
      • Voorhees, New Jersey, 미국
        • Advanced Pain Consultants
    • New York
      • Williamsville, New York, 미국
        • Upstate Clinical Research Associates
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, 미국
        • Wake Research Associates
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, 미국
        • Sterling Research Group, Ltd.
      • Columbus, Ohio, 미국
        • Columbus Clinical Research
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 미국
        • SP Research
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, 미국
        • Pain Research of Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, 미국
        • Summit Research Network Inc.
    • Pennsylvania
      • Downingtown, Pennsylvania, 미국
        • Brandywine Clinical Research
      • Feasterville-Trevose, Pennsylvania, 미국
        • AMH Feasterville Family Health Care Center
      • Tipton, Pennsylvania, 미국
        • Tipton Medical and Diagnostic Center
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, 미국
        • Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP
    • Rhode Island
      • Warwick, Rhode Island, 미국
        • Omega Medical Research
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, 미국
        • Greenville Pharmaceutical Research
      • North Charleston, South Carolina, 미국
        • Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, 미국
        • S. Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, 미국
        • KRK Medical Research
      • Dallas, Texas, 미국
        • Radiant Research
      • Dallas, Texas, 미국
        • Renaissance Clinical Research & Hypertension of Texas, PLLC
      • Houston, Texas, 미국
        • MedStar Clinical Research
      • San Angelo, Texas, 미국
        • Benchmark Research
      • Sugar Land, Texas, 미국
        • DCT-Sugarland, LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials
      • Waco, Texas, 미국
        • Hillcrest Family Health Centers
    • Utah
      • Orem, Utah, 미국
        • Aspen Clinical Research, LLC

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol.
  • The patient has either completed Cephalon study 3079 or has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration prior to entering this study associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with other painful conditions may qualify for the study with permission from the Cephalon medical monitor or designee.
  • Those patients who completed the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (study 3079) and are willing to re-titrate study drug to an effective dose of hydrocodone extended-release tablets are eligible to enter this study.
  • The patient is able to speak English, willing to provide written informed consent, and sign a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
  • The patient is 18 through 80 years of age (inclusive) at the time of entering this or the previous study (study 3079).
  • Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who were enrolled in study 3079 but did not complete the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study may not be enrolled into this study.
  • The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the study drug or its excipients.
  • The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • The patient has a medical or psychiatric condition/disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
  • The patient is taking a total (i.e., including around-the clock [ATC] and rescue medications) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone or equivalent for 14 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has a history of suicidality.
  • The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition under study.
  • The patient is expected to have surgery during the study and it is anticipated that the surgery will alleviate the patient's pain.
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient has active malignancy.
  • The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values.
  • The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids.
  • The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days (excluding those who participated in study 3079).
  • The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
  • The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
  • The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated.
  • The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) for an illicit substance or medication not prescribed by the physician currently treating the chronic pain.
  • The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 해당 없음
  • 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Hydrocodone ER
Participants were titrated (or re-titrated for roll-over participants) at escalating dosages of extended-release hydrocodone tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg orally every 12 hours until deemed successful for managing their pain during the open-label titration period. Once a successful dose was identified, participants entered the 52 week open-label treatment period in which hydrocodone ER was administered at the successful dose (15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg) every 12 hours.
Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets were administered at doses of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg orally every 12 hours. During the open-label titration period, doses were adjusted until a stable pain control was achieved. In general, the dose of hydrocodone extended release tablets could be adjusted for efficacy or tolerability, as necessary, at any time during the open-label treatment period; however, participants were required to visit the study center before increasing the dose of study drug.
다른 이름들:
  • CEP-33237
  • Hydrocodone bitartrate 서방형

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Participants With Adverse Experiences
기간: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status
기간: Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values.

Significance criteria:

  • alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L
  • aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L
  • blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >=10.71 mmol/L
  • creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
  • uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
  • white blood cell count: <=3.0*10^9/L
  • hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
  • hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
  • urine blood (hemoglobin): >=2 unit increase from baseline
  • urine glucose: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status
기간: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.

Significance criteria

  • Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline
  • Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute
  • Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg
  • Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg
  • Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg
  • Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg
Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status
기간: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period

A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event.

For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized.

Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.

Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period
Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status
기간: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods
Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status
기간: Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52
The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009).
Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52
Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)
기간: End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period

SOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use.

An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are

  • <18 and
  • <=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat
End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
기간: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study.
Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
기간: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior.
Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2010년 10월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2012년 9월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2012년 9월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2010년 10월 15일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2010년 10월 18일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2010년 10월 19일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2017년 6월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2017년 5월 2일

마지막으로 확인됨

2017년 5월 1일

추가 정보

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

만성 통증에 대한 임상 시험

Hydrocodone ER에 대한 임상 시험

3
구독하다