이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

자폐 아동의 히스패닉 및 라틴계 가족을 연구에 참여시키기 위한 디자인 사고 방법론 테스트.

2026년 8월 12일 업데이트: Thomas Jefferson University

The goal of this study is to compare two methods of engagement in research that include autistic individuals, Hispanic and Latino parents of autistic children, occupational therapy clinicians, teachers, and to use the information collected in the sessions to culturally adapt the occupational therapy Ayres Sensory Integration intervention to improve participation and health outcomes.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the Design Thinking process result in higher stakeholder engagement and satisfaction in the research process in comparison to Focus Groups? Secondary question: Do cultural adaptations using DT data yield higher acceptability and implementation feasibility scores than FG methods?

Participants will:

  • Be randomized into two groups of engagement (focus groups and design thinking)
  • Be blinded (clinicians, selected caregivers, autistic persons, and cultural experts) and will rate the culturally adapted manualized protocol and evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and cultural appropriateness of each protocol based on DT data, higher than the protocol based on FG data.

연구 개요

상세 설명

Racial and ethnic minorities with autistic children experience delays in access to therapy services that can result in poorer outcomes, decreased quality of life, and increased parental and financial stress. Many autism interventions were developed and tested with only White participants, assuming they could be transferable to minority populations. However, research has found that this is not the case and that interventions that are not adapted to an individual's culture and ethnicity do not work as well and are not used as frequently. In this project, we compare two methods of stakeholder engagement, Design Thinking (DT) and Focus Groups (FG), to determine which is better at getting input on the facilitators and barriers to access therapy for autistic children. We focus on Hispanics and Latinos as this is the largest minority group in the US, with one of the fastest-growing groups of autistic children. Our long-term objective is to improve the functional skills and health of Hispanic/Latino autistic children and their families by improving access to an occupational therapy intervention designed to improve daily living skills, socialization, and quality of life. Occupational therapy using Ayres Sensory Integration (OT/ASI) is the only evidence-based intervention that addresses the sensory symptoms in autism. We will use input from these engagement sessions to adapt two versions of the OT/ASI manual: one using DT data and the other using FG data. Outcomes are evaluated following each step. Following the completion of this project, the planned outputs of the study are data on the most effective minority stakeholder engagement method and a culturally adapted OT/ASI manual for Hispanic and Latino autistic children for clinicians and researchers. This information can support future researchers who are engaging Hispanic/Latino individuals or other minority groups in research.

Methods: A randomized mixed methods design is used to evaluate stakeholder engagement methods. Phase one will compare two stakeholder engagement methods (Design Thinking -DT, and Focus Group - FG) and evaluate stakeholder engagement based on the PCORI areas of stakeholder engagement which are operationalized in the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Evaluation and qualitative data. Phase two utilizes data from phase one to culturally adapt the intervention (two separate intervention protocols will be adapted - one based on FG data and another based on DT data as described below), and obtain stakeholder input on acceptability and feasibility for the Hispanic/Latino autistic population. This provides a second way to measure the effectiveness of each stakeholder engagement method as we will have data to indicate which method (DT or FG) resulted in the highest-rated protocol. The data provided by this study will be used as a basis for a later comparative effectiveness study that will study the culturally adapted protocol's outcomes.

All sessions will be held in Spanish and/or English based on the groups' preferences. Since our intent is to hear the voices of Hispanic/Latino stakeholders, it seems valuable to hold focus groups in Spanish when the participants are Spanish as first language speakers (hereafter referred to as Spanish-first) with audio recordings and later transcription into English for analysis. To accommodate those who prefer English, we will make every effort to group these participants together. When, and if, the Spanish-first groups include participants who prefer English, we will have a Spanish to English translator available. In other words, we will be respectful of each participant's language to optimize their comfort in the engagement sessions.

This project addresses an urgent need to engage stakeholders as part of the research process from conceptualization to dissemination and the need for culturally sensitive evidence-based interventions for Hispanic/Latino autistic children. This project is being developed by a skilled and experienced team of investigators.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

130

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 미국, 19107-5084
        • Thomas Jefferson University

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Autistic person:

    • confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
    • Hispanic/Latino
    • received therapeutic services as a child; and
    • willing and able (with i.e., language and cognitive skills) to participate in the design thinking or focus group session designed to learn about the facilitator and barriers to receipt of therapeutic services.
  • Parent/caregiver:

    • Hispanic/Latino caregiver of an autistic child who receives or received therapeutic services such as occupational, physical, speech and language therapy
    • willing to participate in the design thinking or focus group session designed to learn about the facilitator and barriers to receipt of therapeutic services.
  • Exclusion Criteria:

    • Do not meet age for autistic individual or diagnostic criteria

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 다른
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 더블

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
다른: Design Thinking Group

A group of randomized participants (autistic adults, parents/caregivers, OT practitioners, teachers, and cultural experts) will participate in the Design Thinking (DT) process.

Participants attend the DT session through all the stages that include emphasize, define, ideate, prototype and test.

다른: Focus Group

A group of randomized participants (autistic adults, parents/caregivers, OT practitioners, teachers, and cultural experts) will participate in the Focus Group (FG) process.

Participants attend the FG that includes the introduction. discussion, and reflection.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Evaluation (S-CEE) (Martinez et al., 2021)
기간: Immediately following the one time engagement session

The Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Evaluation (S-CEE) is a measure used to assess the frequency and perceived quality of stakeholder engagement across 10 engagement domains, including: collaboration, communication, inclusion, transparency, learning, organizational structure, dissemination, and responsiveness to input. The measure evaluates two dimensions of engagement: frequency ("How Often") and quality ("How Well"). Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale. For "How Often," response options range from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"). For "How Well," response options range from 1 ("Poor") to 5 ("Excellent"). Higher scores indicate greater frequency and higher perceived quality of stakeholder engagement. The S-CEE was administered to all participants immediately following the one-time engagement session to capture their perceptions of engagement.

Immediately following the one time engagement session

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (Weiner et al., 2017)
기간: Immediately following the cultural adaptation reviews.

The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) are validated implementation outcome measures used to assess acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the culturally adapted intervention based on the discussions in the focus groups and design thinking engagement sessions to improve access, use of therapy services, and strategies to adapt an evidence-based therapy intervention. AIM includes 5 items assessing the perceived acceptability of the intervention, IAM includes 4 items assessing the perceived appropriateness or fit of the intervention, and FIM includes 4 items assessing the perceived feasibility of implementing the intervention. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Completely disagree") to 5 ("Completely agree"). Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the culturally adapted intervention.

Immediately following the cultural adaptation reviews.

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Roseann C Schaaf, Thomas Jefferson University

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2024년 2월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2026년 4월 1일

연구 완료 (실제)

2026년 4월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2023년 10월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2023년 10월 26일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2023년 11월 1일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 11월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 8월 12일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 8월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

Publications in high-impact autism and occupational therapy journals and presentations at national and international autism research meetings.

IPD 공유 기간

Some de-identified data will be available following completion of the study and publication of findings.

IPD 공유 액세스 기준

Upon written request (reviewed by the principal investigator) information will be shared.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다