Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Generative AI-Based Evaluation of Clinical Thinking and Decision-Making in Medical Students

30 oktober 2026 bijgewerkt door: Danzhi Chen, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Construction of an Intelligent Evaluation System for Clinical Thinking and Decision-making Ability of Medical Students Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence

The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate an intelligent system based on generative artificial intelligence (AI) for assessing clinical thinking and decision-making abilities in medical students.

The study will examine whether the AI-based evaluation system can provide reliable and valid assessments of medical students' performance in clinical scenarios. Participants will complete clinical case-based tasks designed to assess their clinical reasoning and decision-making abilities. Their responses will be evaluated using the AI-based system and compared with assessments made using established evaluation methods and/or expert ratings.

The findings of this study may help determine whether generative AI can be used as a practical tool for assessing clinical thinking and decision-making skills in medical education.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

This study aims to develop and evaluate a generative artificial intelligence-based system for assessing clinical thinking and decision-making abilities in medical students. Clinical reasoning and decision-making are core competencies in medical education, but conventional assessment methods often require substantial faculty time and may be influenced by differences among evaluators.

The study will develop an intelligent evaluation framework using generative artificial intelligence to analyze medical students' responses to clinical case-based tasks. The system will assess key aspects of clinical thinking and decision-making, such as information interpretation, diagnostic reasoning, selection of appropriate management strategies, and overall decision-making logic.

Medical students participating in the study will complete standardized clinical scenarios or case-based assessment tasks. Their performance will be evaluated using the artificial intelligence-based system and compared with evaluations made by qualified clinical experts and/or established assessment methods. The study will examine the reliability, validity, consistency, and feasibility of the artificial intelligence-based evaluation approach.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether generative artificial intelligence can serve as a reliable and practical tool for evaluating clinical thinking and decision-making abilities in medical education. The system is intended for educational assessment and is not designed to replace clinical diagnosis or treatment decisions.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

90

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 30 jaar (Volwassen)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 30 years.
  • Fourth- or fifth-year undergraduate students majoring in Clinical Medicine at Zhejiang University School of Medicine, or trainees who have completed at least one year of standardized residency training at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
  • Have completed basic surgery courses and theoretical learning related to breast diseases.
  • Voluntarily agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.
  • Have adequate communication and comprehension abilities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have previously participated in similar generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-based teaching intervention studies.
  • Are unable to complete the entire study because of rotation schedules or other conflicts.
  • Belong to vulnerable populations other than employees of the study institution or subordinates of the investigators, including individuals with mental illness, cognitive impairment, critical illness, pregnancy, or illiteracy.
  • Refuse or are unwilling to provide informed consent.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ander
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Actieve vergelijker: Control Group: Traditional Teaching

the standardized surgical oncology teaching curriculum, utilizing standardized breast cancer teaching PowerPoint courseware.

Participants will receive standard traditional teaching, including routine classroom instruction, case-based learning, and teacher-guided discussion, without the use of the generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning component.

Experimenteel: Intervention Group: Traditional Teaching Plus AI Assistance

the independently developed "Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making Dialogue Evaluation System" on the basis of the same traditional teaching.

Participants will receive standard traditional teaching, including routine classroom instruction, case-based learning, and teacher-guided discussion, without the use of the generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning component.

The intervention consists of traditional medical education supplemented with a generative artificial intelligence-based learning tool. The tool will support students in clinical case analysis, reasoning, and decision-making exercises. The control group will receive the same traditional teaching without access to the AI-assisted learning component.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Clinical Reasoning Score on Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to Week 4

The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better clinical thinking and decision-making ability

Baseline to Week 4

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Between GAI-Based and Expert Assessment Scores
Tijdsspanne: Baseline to Week 4

Both Generative AI (GAI) and human experts will evaluate the participants using the clinical Reasoning Assessment Rubric. The agreement between the GAI-based scores and expert assessment scores will be evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) . The coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate better agreement.

Baseline to Week 4
Time to Complete the Assessment
Tijdsspanne: During the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment at Week 4 (completion time measured in minutes).

Assessment completion time is defined as the duration, measured in minutes, from the initiation of the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment to its final submission by the participant. The time will be automatically recorded by the evaluation platform. Each participant's assessment completion time will be measured during the assessment conducted at Week 4.

During the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment at Week 4 (completion time measured in minutes).
Participant Satisfaction Score on the GAI-Assisted Evaluation System
Tijdsspanne: Week 4

Participant satisfaction will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = Very Dissatisfied to 5 = Very Satisfied). A higher score indicates higher satisfaction with the GAI-assisted evaluation system.

Week 4

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

26 september 2025

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

25 december 2025

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

25 december 2025

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

9 oktober 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

30 oktober 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

4 november 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

4 november 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

30 oktober 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 oktober 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • Research 2025734

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .