Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Generative AI-Based Evaluation of Clinical Thinking and Decision-Making in Medical Students

30 ottobre 2026 aggiornato da: Danzhi Chen, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

Construction of an Intelligent Evaluation System for Clinical Thinking and Decision-making Ability of Medical Students Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence

The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate an intelligent system based on generative artificial intelligence (AI) for assessing clinical thinking and decision-making abilities in medical students.

The study will examine whether the AI-based evaluation system can provide reliable and valid assessments of medical students' performance in clinical scenarios. Participants will complete clinical case-based tasks designed to assess their clinical reasoning and decision-making abilities. Their responses will be evaluated using the AI-based system and compared with assessments made using established evaluation methods and/or expert ratings.

The findings of this study may help determine whether generative AI can be used as a practical tool for assessing clinical thinking and decision-making skills in medical education.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

This study aims to develop and evaluate a generative artificial intelligence-based system for assessing clinical thinking and decision-making abilities in medical students. Clinical reasoning and decision-making are core competencies in medical education, but conventional assessment methods often require substantial faculty time and may be influenced by differences among evaluators.

The study will develop an intelligent evaluation framework using generative artificial intelligence to analyze medical students' responses to clinical case-based tasks. The system will assess key aspects of clinical thinking and decision-making, such as information interpretation, diagnostic reasoning, selection of appropriate management strategies, and overall decision-making logic.

Medical students participating in the study will complete standardized clinical scenarios or case-based assessment tasks. Their performance will be evaluated using the artificial intelligence-based system and compared with evaluations made by qualified clinical experts and/or established assessment methods. The study will examine the reliability, validity, consistency, and feasibility of the artificial intelligence-based evaluation approach.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether generative artificial intelligence can serve as a reliable and practical tool for evaluating clinical thinking and decision-making abilities in medical education. The system is intended for educational assessment and is not designed to replace clinical diagnosis or treatment decisions.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

90

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Cina, 310000
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 18 anni a 30 anni (Adulto)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 30 years.
  • Fourth- or fifth-year undergraduate students majoring in Clinical Medicine at Zhejiang University School of Medicine, or trainees who have completed at least one year of standardized residency training at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
  • Have completed basic surgery courses and theoretical learning related to breast diseases.
  • Voluntarily agree to participate in the study and provide written informed consent.
  • Have adequate communication and comprehension abilities.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have previously participated in similar generative artificial intelligence (GAI)-based teaching intervention studies.
  • Are unable to complete the entire study because of rotation schedules or other conflicts.
  • Belong to vulnerable populations other than employees of the study institution or subordinates of the investigators, including individuals with mental illness, cognitive impairment, critical illness, pregnancy, or illiteracy.
  • Refuse or are unwilling to provide informed consent.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Control Group: Traditional Teaching

the standardized surgical oncology teaching curriculum, utilizing standardized breast cancer teaching PowerPoint courseware.

Participants will receive standard traditional teaching, including routine classroom instruction, case-based learning, and teacher-guided discussion, without the use of the generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning component.

Sperimentale: Intervention Group: Traditional Teaching Plus AI Assistance

the independently developed "Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making Dialogue Evaluation System" on the basis of the same traditional teaching.

Participants will receive standard traditional teaching, including routine classroom instruction, case-based learning, and teacher-guided discussion, without the use of the generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning component.

The intervention consists of traditional medical education supplemented with a generative artificial intelligence-based learning tool. The tool will support students in clinical case analysis, reasoning, and decision-making exercises. The control group will receive the same traditional teaching without access to the AI-assisted learning component.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in Clinical Reasoning Score on Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to Week 4

The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better clinical thinking and decision-making ability

Baseline to Week 4

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Between GAI-Based and Expert Assessment Scores
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to Week 4

Both Generative AI (GAI) and human experts will evaluate the participants using the clinical Reasoning Assessment Rubric. The agreement between the GAI-based scores and expert assessment scores will be evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) . The coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate better agreement.

Baseline to Week 4
Time to Complete the Assessment
Lasso di tempo: During the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment at Week 4 (completion time measured in minutes).

Assessment completion time is defined as the duration, measured in minutes, from the initiation of the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment to its final submission by the participant. The time will be automatically recorded by the evaluation platform. Each participant's assessment completion time will be measured during the assessment conducted at Week 4.

During the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment at Week 4 (completion time measured in minutes).
Participant Satisfaction Score on the GAI-Assisted Evaluation System
Lasso di tempo: Week 4

Participant satisfaction will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = Very Dissatisfied to 5 = Very Satisfied). A higher score indicates higher satisfaction with the GAI-assisted evaluation system.

Week 4

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

26 settembre 2025

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

25 dicembre 2025

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

25 dicembre 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

9 ottobre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

30 ottobre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

4 novembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

30 ottobre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 ottobre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • Research 2025734

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .