A Decision Support Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Screening -Aim 2
Pancreatic cancer has a rising incidence and poor survival. Early detection in high-risk individuals may substantially improve outcomes. Although guidelines recommend screening for individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes or certain genetic variants, pancreatic cancer screening remains uncertain due to limited evidence of mortality benefit, unclear screening strategies, potential harms, resource requirements, and low adherence. Shared decision-making between patients and providers is therefore essential, but no decision aid currently exists to support pancreatic cancer screening decisions. This record covers Aim 2, which will evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation of an electronic decision support tool designed to improve shared decision-making, value-concordant care, and screening adherence. The pilot study will also provide training in clinical trial methodology and support development toward an independent research career.
Studieoversikt
Status
Status
Forhold
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Intervensjon / Behandling
Studietype
Studietype
Registrering (Antatt)
Registrering
Fase
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Trevor Barlowe, MD
- Telefonnummer: 919-984-0000
- E-post: trevor_barlowe@med.unc.edu
Studiesteder
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Forente stater, 27599
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
-
Ta kontakt med:
- Trevor Barlowe, MD
-
Hovedetterforsker:
- Trevor Barlowe, MD
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults who are eligible for pancreatic cancer screening according to current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
- Not currently enrolled in a pancreatic cancer screening program.
- Referred to or previously seen at the UNC High Risk GI Cancer Clinic.
- English-speaking.
- Able and willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently enrolled in a pancreatic cancer screening program.
- Does not meet pancreatic cancer screening eligibility criteria according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
- Non-English speaking.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Forebygging
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Antall våpen
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / ArmDeltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / BehandlingIntervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Electronic Decision Support Tool
Patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening will use an electronic decision support tool during clinical care to support shared decision-making regarding pancreatic cancer screening. |
Participants will use an electronic decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision-making about pancreatic cancer screening. The pilot study will evaluate the tool's acceptability, feasibility, and implementation in clinical practice. |
|
Ingen inngripen: Standard of Care
Patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening will receive usual clinical care without use of the electronic decision support tool. |
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of the decision support tool
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Participant-reported acceptability of the electronic decision support tool, assessed using a validated acceptability measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) and intervention appropriateness measure (IAM). The minimum score for both measures is 4 (all items rated "1 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 20 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree"). |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Feasibility, Barriers, and Facilitators of Implementing the Decision Support Tool - Recruitment Rate
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Recruitment rate, defined as the proportion and number of eligible participants who enroll in the study, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the electronic decision support tool in clinical practice. |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of implementing the decision support tool - retention rate
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Retention rate, defined as the number and proportion of enrolled participants who complete use of the electronic decision support tool and all study-related assessments, will be used to assess the feasibility of integrating and implementing the tool in clinical practice. |
Up to 3 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in score on 5 question knowledge assessment
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores regarding the screening decision. Change in knowledge will be defined as the difference between participants' post-visit and pre-visit knowledge scores on a five-item knowledge assessment, calculated as the post-knowledge score minus the pre-knowledge score. Pre- and post-knowledge scores will be calculated by summing correct answers (equal to 1) and incorrect or incomplete responses (equal to 0). The assessment will be administered immediately before and after the clinic visit. |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Rate of Decision-Concordant Care
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
If the participant undergoes the screening test documented during the clinic visit within 3 months of the visit, this will be considered decision-concordant care. The rate of decision concordant care will be equal to the number of participants who underwent decision-concordant care divided by the total number of participants in the study. Medical record/chart review will be used for measurements |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Duration of the clinic visit
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Duration of the clinic visit will be measured as the duration of the index clinic visit using available clinical or electronic medical record timestamps. This measure will be used to evaluate whether the intervention affects the amount of time required to complete the clinic visit. |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -1
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Patient-reported assessment of the quality of the shared decision-making process, including the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered in the decision. It will be measured using the collaboRATE questionnaire, administered immediately following the clinic visit and using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). The SDM-Q-9 measures the extent to which patients perceive that key components of shared decision-making occurred during the clinical encounter. The minimum score for the SDM-Q-9 is 0 (all items rated "0 - Completely Disagree") and the maximum score is 45 (all items rated "5 - Completely Agree"). Higher scores indicate a patient perception of better shared decision making. It will be administered immediately following the clinic visit. |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Patient-reported assessment of shared decision-making quality -2
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Patient-reported perception of the extent to which shared decision-making occurred during the clinic visit will be additionally be assessed using the 3 question collaboRATE questionnaire. The collaboRATE questionnaire measures the extent to which patients received information about available options, understood the benefits and risks of those options, and had their preferences considered. The minimum score for collaborate is 0 (all items rated "0 - No Effort") and the maximum score is 12 (all items rated "4 - Every Effort"). T the collaboRATE questionnaire will be administered immediately following the clinic visit. |
Up to 3 months
|
|
Patient-reported assessment of decisional conflict
Tidsramme: Up to 3 months
|
Patient-reported uncertainty or conflict regarding the screening decision, including factors such as informed choice, will be assessed using the 16 question decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The minimum score for the DCS is 0 (no decisional conflict) and the maximum score is 100 (extremely high decisional conflict). The DCS will be administered immediately following the clinic visit. |
Up to 3 months
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Samarbeidspartnere
Samarbeidspartnere
Etterforskere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Trevor Barlowe, MD, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Antatt)
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
Primær fullføring
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
Studiet fullført
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Først lagt ut
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Sist oppdatering lagt ut
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 25-3036AIM2
- K12TR004416 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying published results will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, beginning one year after publication.
IPD-delingstidsramme
One year after publication
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .