- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT00427934
Maraviroc in Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Maraviroc in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Receiving Methotrexate
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Studietype
Registrering (Faktiske)
Fase
- Fase 2
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiesteder
-
-
Queensland
-
Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia, 4558
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
South Australia
-
Woodville, South Australia, Australia, 5011
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Tasmania
-
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7001
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Huntington Beach, California, Forente stater, 92646
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
San Francisco, California, Forente stater, 94115
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Connecticut
-
Hamden, Connecticut, Forente stater, 06518
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Meriden, Connecticut, Forente stater, 06450
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
New Haven, Connecticut, Forente stater, 06511-5473
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
New Haven, Connecticut, Forente stater, 06510-2716
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Florida
-
Daytona Beach, Florida, Forente stater, 32114
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Port Orange, Florida, Forente stater, 32127
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Savannah, Georgia, Forente stater, 31405
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Savannah, Georgia, Forente stater, 31406
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Moline, Illinois, Forente stater, 61265
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Madisonville, Kentucky, Forente stater, 42431
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, Forente stater, 49007
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, Forente stater, 49048
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, Forente stater, 68154
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, Forente stater, 89128
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
New York
-
Syracuse, New York, Forente stater, 13210
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Hickory, North Carolina, Forente stater, 28601
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Hickory, North Carolina, Forente stater, 28602
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
North Dakota
-
Minot, North Dakota, Forente stater, 58701
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, Forente stater, 16635
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Andhra Pradesh
-
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, 500 082
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560 034
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560003
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Genova, Italia, 16132
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Pavia, Italia, 27100
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44690
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, CP 44340
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1600-035
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Lisbon, Portugal, 1000-247
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spania, 08035
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Madrid, Spania, 28007
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Sevilla, Spania, 41014
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
A Coruña
-
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spania, 15705
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Tyskland, 10117
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Berlin, Tyskland, 14059
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Leipzig, Tyskland, 04103
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraina, 49005
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Kharkiv, Ukraina, 61000
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Simferopol, Ukraina, 95017
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
Tar imot friske frivillige
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be legal age of consent
- Must have active rheumatoid arthritis based upon the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 (Revised Criteria); minimum disease criteria required for entry into the efficacy component of the study
- Must meet ACR 1991 Revised Criteria for Global Functional Status in RA, Class I, II, or III
- Must be receiving methotrexate for at least 12 weeks duration and on a stable dose for 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with any other inflammatory arthritis or a secondary non-inflammatory arthritis that would interfere with disease activity assessments.
- Subject receiving prior treatment with certain medications for rheumatoid arthritis
- Tuberculosis and/or a positive tuberculin reaction
- Significant trauma or major surgery within 2 months
- History of alcohol and/or drug abuse outside of a defined period of abstinence
- History of or a finding at screening of postural hypotension
- Any condition that would affect the oral absorption of the drug
- History of cancer and in remission less than 3 years or Grade III-IV congestive heart failure
- Having an infection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or C or evidence of any active infection
- Abnormalities of clinical or laboratory assessments completed at the screening visit such as elevated liver enzymes, decreased hemoglobin or an abnormal ECG
- Having a positive chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) delta 32 mutation
- Requiring the use of certain medications
- Lactating or pregnant women or subjects have reproductive potential unwilling to use an adequate method of birth control
- Chronic or recent serious or life-threatening infection; severe , progressive and/or uncontrollable renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological disease within 12 weeks of the first dose.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Dobbelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
---|---|
Placebo komparator: 2
|
Placebo tablets to match active drug.
Two tablets are administered by mouth twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks.
|
Eksperimentell: 1
This study was divided into two components: safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) and proof-of-concept (POC).
In the safety/PK component either 150 mg or 300 mg tablets of maraviroc was administered twice a day (BID) to 16 rheumatoid arthritis subjects for 4 weeks.
|
300 mg (2- 150 mg tablets) are administered by mouth twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Responders at Week 12
Tidsramme: Week 12
|
A subject was an ACR 20 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 20% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 20% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (VAS), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Categorical), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
|
Week 12
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
---|---|---|
ACR 20% Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
Tidsramme: Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
|
A subject was an ACR 20 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 20% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 20% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 ACR 20% data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
|
ACR 50% Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
A subject was an ACR 50 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 50% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 50% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 ACR 50% data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
ACR 70% Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
A subject was an ACR 70 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 70% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 70% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 ACR 70% data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for tender/painful joint count.
Twenty-eight tender and swollen joint scores included the same joints: shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP), proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP), and the knees.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 tender/painful joint count data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for swollen joint count.
Twenty-eight tender and swollen joint scores included the same joints: shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP joints, PIP joints, and the knees.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 swollen joint count data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
The severity of arthritis was scored by the subject between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain) on a 100 mm VAS.
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Subjects answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?"
Subjects responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS where 0=very well and 100=very poorly.
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for Patient's Global Assessment.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Physician's evaluation based on subject's disease signs, functional capacity and physical exam.
Response recorded using 5-point scale: 1=Very Good, 2=Good, 3=Fair, 4=Poor and 5=Very Poor.
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for Physician's Global Assessment.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy thus Week 16 Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain data were collected but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
HAQ-DI assesses degree of difficulty experienced in daily activity categories (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities) over the past week.
There are 20 questions and difficulty is scored from 0 (none), 1 (some), 2 (much) and 3 (unable to do).
Scores were then averaged to give the disability index (scale of 0 to 3).
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 HAQ-DI data were collected but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change from baseline at each visit were analyzed for CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 CRP data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using CRP (DAS28-4[CRP]) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28- 4(CRP) = 0.56 √28 Tender Joint Count + 0.28 √28 Swollen Joint Count + 0.36*natural logarithm(CRP + 1) + 0.014*Patient Global Assessment + 0.96. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for DAS28-4 (CRP). The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 DAS28-4 (CRP) data were collected, but not analyzed. |
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Orthostatic Blood Pressure (BP)
Tidsramme: Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Supine BP was recorded after 5 minutes lying down; subjects then sat for 2 minutes then stood for 2 minutes and standing BP was recorded.
Orthostatic BP = either a systolic BP drop > 20 mmHg, or diastolic BP drop > 10 mmHg and/or drop in systolic BP < 90 mmHg.
If a subject met the orthostatic criteria, they were required to complete 2 additional readings to provide a triplicate reading.
The means of replicate BP values were used in the analysis.
Baseline = the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Change from baseline to Week 16 was analyzed for orthostatic BP.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Heart Rate
Tidsramme: Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Heart rate = standing and supine at the same time the orthostatic BP measurements were obtained.
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Means of replicate values were not used.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Number of Subjects With Categorical Absolute Vital Signs and Vital Sign Changes Compared to Baseline
Tidsramme: Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Maximum increase from baseline in supine and standing systolic BP was > = 30 mmHg, and maximum increase from baseline in supine and standing diastolic BP was > = 20 mmHg.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters (RR Interval, PR Interval, QRS Complex, QT Interval, Corrected QT [QTc] Interval, QTcB Interval [Bazett's Correction], QTcF Interval [Fridericia's Correction]).
Tidsramme: Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Means of replicate values were used.
QTc interval was not measured for the PK populations.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters (Heart Rate).
Tidsramme: Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Means of replicate values were used.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Number of Subjects With Categorical Absolute ECG Parameters and ECG Changes Compared to Baseline
Tidsramme: Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Maximum QTcB, QTcF, and QTc intervals were defined as 450 to < 480 msec, 480 to < 500 msec, or > = 500 msec.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary at Weeks 4 and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
The SF-36 v.2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that measures 8 general health concepts: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Each domain of the eight domains and the summary concept (physical component score) are scored to yield values between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).
Change from baseline at Weeks 4 and 12 were analyzed for SF-36.
Due to the termination of the study, SF-36 results for the PK component group were not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary at Weeks 4 and 12
Tidsramme: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
The SF-36 v.2 (Acute version) [12] is a 36-item generic health status measure that measures 8 general health concepts: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Each domain of the eight domains and the summary concept (mental component score) are scored to yield values between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).
Change from baseline at Weeks 4 and 12 were analyzed for SF-36.
Due to the termination of the study, SF-36 results for the PK component group were not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
Number of Subjects With Withdrawal From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
Tidsramme: 16 weeks
|
Withdrawal is the total number of withdrawals from the study.
Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was collected based on the investigator's judgement.
|
16 weeks
|
Survival Analysis of Time to Withdrawal: Proportion of Subjects Who Did Not Withdraw From the Study Due to Lack of Efficacy.
Tidsramme: Weeks 1 to 12
|
Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was collected based on the investigator's judgement.
Time to withdrawal was measured by the probability that a subject did not withdraw due to lack of efficacy by a particular visit.
This was a statistical estimate (Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis) of the probability that a participant would not withdraw due to lack of efficacy.
|
Weeks 1 to 12
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Four Hours Postdose (AUC 0-4) for MTX at Screening and Week 1 and Maraviroc at Week 1
Tidsramme: Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Effect of maraviroc on the PK of MTX (comparison of AUC0-4 of MTX at screening versus at Week 1 after coadministration with 150 mg or 300 mg of maraviroc).
PK was assessed at screening (MTX) and at Week 1 (maraviroc and MTX).
|
Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) During the Dosing Interval for MTX at Screening and Week 1 and Maraviroc at Week 1
Tidsramme: Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Effect of maraviroc on the PK of MTX (comparison of Cmax of MTX at screening versus at Week 1 after coadministration with 150 mg or 300 mg of maraviroc).
PK was assessed at screening (MTX) and at Week 1 (maraviroc and MTX).
|
Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Time for Cmax (Tmax) for MTX at Screening and Week 1 and Maraviroc at Week 1
Tidsramme: Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
PK was assessed at screening (MTX) and at Week 1 (maraviroc and MTX).
|
Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Hjelpsomme linker
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Anslag)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
- Sykdommer i immunsystemet
- Autoimmune sykdommer
- Leddsykdommer
- Muskel- og skjelettsykdommer
- Revmatiske sykdommer
- Bindevevssykdommer
- Leddgikt
- Leddgikt, revmatoid
- Molekylære mekanismer for farmakologisk virkning
- Anti-infeksjonsmidler
- Antivirale midler
- Anti-HIV-midler
- Antiretrovirale midler
- HIV-fusjonshemmere
- Virale fusjonsproteinhemmere
- CCR5-reseptorantagonister
- Maraviroc
Andre studie-ID-numre
- A4001056
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .
Kliniske studier på Maraviroc Placebo
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...FullførtHIV-infeksjonerForente stater, Puerto Rico, Thailand, Sør-Afrika, Brasil
-
University of California, San FranciscoPfizer; Stanford University; amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research; Case... og andre samarbeidspartnereFullført
-
International Partnership for Microbicides, Inc.Tilbaketrukket
-
International Partnership for Microbicides, Inc.Fullført
-
S.F.L. van LelyveldPfizer; Erasmus Medical Center; Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit... og andre samarbeidspartnereFullført
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesPfizerFullført
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaFullførtHematopoetisk stamcelletransplantasjon | Graft-versus-host-sykdom
-
ViiV HealthcarePfizerIkke lenger tilgjengelig
-
Kirby InstituteFullførtHjerte-og karsykdommerArgentina, Australia, Tyskland, Thailand
-
ViiV HealthcarePfizerFullførtHIVForente stater, Storbritannia, Tyskland