Maraviroc in Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Maraviroc in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Receiving Methotrexate
研究概览
详细说明
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 阶段2
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
-
Dnipropetrovsk、乌克兰、49005
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Kharkiv、乌克兰、61000
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Simferopol、乌克兰、95017
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Andhra Pradesh
-
Hyderabad、Andhra Pradesh、印度、500 082
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Karnataka
-
Bangalore、Karnataka、印度、560 034
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Bangalore、Karnataka、印度、560003
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara、Jalisco、墨西哥、44690
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Guadalajara、Jalisco、墨西哥、CP 44340
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin、德国、10117
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Berlin、德国、14059
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Leipzig、德国、04103
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Genova、意大利、16132
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Pavia、意大利、27100
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Queensland
-
Maroochydore、Queensland、澳大利亚、4558
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
South Australia
-
Woodville、South Australia、澳大利亚、5011
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Tasmania
-
Hobart、Tasmania、澳大利亚、7001
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Huntington Beach、California、美国、92646
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
San Francisco、California、美国、94115
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Connecticut
-
Hamden、Connecticut、美国、06518
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Meriden、Connecticut、美国、06450
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
New Haven、Connecticut、美国、06511-5473
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
New Haven、Connecticut、美国、06510-2716
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Florida
-
Daytona Beach、Florida、美国、32114
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Port Orange、Florida、美国、32127
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Georgia
-
Savannah、Georgia、美国、31405
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Savannah、Georgia、美国、31406
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Moline、Illinois、美国、61265
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Madisonville、Kentucky、美国、42431
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Kalamazoo、Michigan、美国、49007
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Kalamazoo、Michigan、美国、49048
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha、Nebraska、美国、68154
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas、Nevada、美国、89128
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
New York
-
Syracuse、New York、美国、13210
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
North Carolina
-
Hickory、North Carolina、美国、28601
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Hickory、North Carolina、美国、28602
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
North Dakota
-
Minot、North Dakota、美国、58701
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Duncansville、Pennsylvania、美国、16635
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Coimbra、葡萄牙、3000-075
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Lisboa、葡萄牙、1600-035
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Lisbon、葡萄牙、1000-247
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona、西班牙、08035
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Madrid、西班牙、28007
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
Sevilla、西班牙、41014
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
A Coruña
-
Santiago de Compostela、A Coruña、西班牙、15705
- Pfizer Investigational Site
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be legal age of consent
- Must have active rheumatoid arthritis based upon the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 (Revised Criteria); minimum disease criteria required for entry into the efficacy component of the study
- Must meet ACR 1991 Revised Criteria for Global Functional Status in RA, Class I, II, or III
- Must be receiving methotrexate for at least 12 weeks duration and on a stable dose for 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with any other inflammatory arthritis or a secondary non-inflammatory arthritis that would interfere with disease activity assessments.
- Subject receiving prior treatment with certain medications for rheumatoid arthritis
- Tuberculosis and/or a positive tuberculin reaction
- Significant trauma or major surgery within 2 months
- History of alcohol and/or drug abuse outside of a defined period of abstinence
- History of or a finding at screening of postural hypotension
- Any condition that would affect the oral absorption of the drug
- History of cancer and in remission less than 3 years or Grade III-IV congestive heart failure
- Having an infection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or C or evidence of any active infection
- Abnormalities of clinical or laboratory assessments completed at the screening visit such as elevated liver enzymes, decreased hemoglobin or an abnormal ECG
- Having a positive chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) delta 32 mutation
- Requiring the use of certain medications
- Lactating or pregnant women or subjects have reproductive potential unwilling to use an adequate method of birth control
- Chronic or recent serious or life-threatening infection; severe , progressive and/or uncontrollable renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological disease within 12 weeks of the first dose.
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
---|---|
安慰剂比较:2个
|
Placebo tablets to match active drug.
Two tablets are administered by mouth twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks.
|
实验性的:1
This study was divided into two components: safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) and proof-of-concept (POC).
In the safety/PK component either 150 mg or 300 mg tablets of maraviroc was administered twice a day (BID) to 16 rheumatoid arthritis subjects for 4 weeks.
|
300 mg (2- 150 mg tablets) are administered by mouth twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks.
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
---|---|---|
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Responders at Week 12
大体时间:Week 12
|
A subject was an ACR 20 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 20% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 20% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis (VAS), Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (Categorical), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
|
Week 12
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
---|---|---|
ACR 20% Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
大体时间:Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
|
A subject was an ACR 20 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 20% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 20% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 ACR 20% data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8
|
ACR 50% Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
A subject was an ACR 50 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 50% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 50% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 ACR 50% data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
ACR 70% Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
A subject was an ACR 70 responder if: the counts for both tender and swollen joints had reduced by 70% or more from baseline; and 3 out of the following 5 assessments showed reduction of 70% or more from baseline assessment: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 ACR 70% data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for tender/painful joint count.
Twenty-eight tender and swollen joint scores included the same joints: shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP), proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP), and the knees.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 tender/painful joint count data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for swollen joint count.
Twenty-eight tender and swollen joint scores included the same joints: shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP joints, PIP joints, and the knees.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 swollen joint count data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
The severity of arthritis was scored by the subject between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain) on a 100 mm VAS.
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Subjects answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?"
Subjects responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS where 0=very well and 100=very poorly.
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for Patient's Global Assessment.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Physician's evaluation based on subject's disease signs, functional capacity and physical exam.
Response recorded using 5-point scale: 1=Very Good, 2=Good, 3=Fair, 4=Poor and 5=Very Poor.
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for Physician's Global Assessment.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy thus Week 16 Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis Pain data were collected but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
HAQ-DI assesses degree of difficulty experienced in daily activity categories (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities) over the past week.
There are 20 questions and difficulty is scored from 0 (none), 1 (some), 2 (much) and 3 (unable to do).
Scores were then averaged to give the disability index (scale of 0 to 3).
Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 HAQ-DI data were collected but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change from baseline at each visit were analyzed for CRP.
The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 CRP data were collected, but not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using CRP (DAS28-4[CRP]) at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28- 4(CRP) = 0.56 √28 Tender Joint Count + 0.28 √28 Swollen Joint Count + 0.36*natural logarithm(CRP + 1) + 0.014*Patient Global Assessment + 0.96. DAS28 provides a number on a scale (0 to 10) indicating current disease activity. A score above 5.1 means high disease activity and a score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Change from baseline at each visit was analyzed for DAS28-4 (CRP). The Week 16 visit (follow-up) was designed for safety rather than efficacy, thus Week 16 DAS28-4 (CRP) data were collected, but not analyzed. |
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Orthostatic Blood Pressure (BP)
大体时间:Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Supine BP was recorded after 5 minutes lying down; subjects then sat for 2 minutes then stood for 2 minutes and standing BP was recorded.
Orthostatic BP = either a systolic BP drop > 20 mmHg, or diastolic BP drop > 10 mmHg and/or drop in systolic BP < 90 mmHg.
If a subject met the orthostatic criteria, they were required to complete 2 additional readings to provide a triplicate reading.
The means of replicate BP values were used in the analysis.
Baseline = the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Change from baseline to Week 16 was analyzed for orthostatic BP.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Heart Rate
大体时间:Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Heart rate = standing and supine at the same time the orthostatic BP measurements were obtained.
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Means of replicate values were not used.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Number of Subjects With Categorical Absolute Vital Signs and Vital Sign Changes Compared to Baseline
大体时间:Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Maximum increase from baseline in supine and standing systolic BP was > = 30 mmHg, and maximum increase from baseline in supine and standing diastolic BP was > = 20 mmHg.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters (RR Interval, PR Interval, QRS Complex, QT Interval, Corrected QT [QTc] Interval, QTcB Interval [Bazett's Correction], QTcF Interval [Fridericia's Correction]).
大体时间:Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Means of replicate values were used.
QTc interval was not measured for the PK populations.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters (Heart Rate).
大体时间:Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Baseline was defined to be the latest non-missing value from a range of pre-treatment visits.
Means of replicate values were used.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Number of Subjects With Categorical Absolute ECG Parameters and ECG Changes Compared to Baseline
大体时间:Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Maximum QTcB, QTcF, and QTc intervals were defined as 450 to < 480 msec, 480 to < 500 msec, or > = 500 msec.
|
Baseline, 16 weeks
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary at Weeks 4 and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
The SF-36 v.2 (Acute version) is a 36-item generic health status measure that measures 8 general health concepts: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Each domain of the eight domains and the summary concept (physical component score) are scored to yield values between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).
Change from baseline at Weeks 4 and 12 were analyzed for SF-36.
Due to the termination of the study, SF-36 results for the PK component group were not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary at Weeks 4 and 12
大体时间:Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
The SF-36 v.2 (Acute version) [12] is a 36-item generic health status measure that measures 8 general health concepts: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Each domain of the eight domains and the summary concept (mental component score) are scored to yield values between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).
Change from baseline at Weeks 4 and 12 were analyzed for SF-36.
Due to the termination of the study, SF-36 results for the PK component group were not analyzed.
|
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 12
|
Number of Subjects With Withdrawal From Study Due to Lack of Efficacy
大体时间:16 weeks
|
Withdrawal is the total number of withdrawals from the study.
Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was collected based on the investigator's judgement.
|
16 weeks
|
Survival Analysis of Time to Withdrawal: Proportion of Subjects Who Did Not Withdraw From the Study Due to Lack of Efficacy.
大体时间:Weeks 1 to 12
|
Withdrawal due to lack of efficacy was collected based on the investigator's judgement.
Time to withdrawal was measured by the probability that a subject did not withdraw due to lack of efficacy by a particular visit.
This was a statistical estimate (Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis) of the probability that a participant would not withdraw due to lack of efficacy.
|
Weeks 1 to 12
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time Zero to Four Hours Postdose (AUC 0-4) for MTX at Screening and Week 1 and Maraviroc at Week 1
大体时间:Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Effect of maraviroc on the PK of MTX (comparison of AUC0-4 of MTX at screening versus at Week 1 after coadministration with 150 mg or 300 mg of maraviroc).
PK was assessed at screening (MTX) and at Week 1 (maraviroc and MTX).
|
Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) During the Dosing Interval for MTX at Screening and Week 1 and Maraviroc at Week 1
大体时间:Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Effect of maraviroc on the PK of MTX (comparison of Cmax of MTX at screening versus at Week 1 after coadministration with 150 mg or 300 mg of maraviroc).
PK was assessed at screening (MTX) and at Week 1 (maraviroc and MTX).
|
Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
Time for Cmax (Tmax) for MTX at Screening and Week 1 and Maraviroc at Week 1
大体时间:Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
PK was assessed at screening (MTX) and at Week 1 (maraviroc and MTX).
|
Screening (1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose), Week 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post-dose)
|
合作者和调查者
赞助
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.
Maraviroc Placebo的临床试验
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)主动,不招人造血和淋巴细胞肿瘤 | 骨髓纤维化 | 慢性淋巴细胞白血病 | 缓解期成人急性髓性白血病 | 骨髓增生异常综合症 | 缓解期成人急性淋巴细胞白血病 | 骨髓增殖性肿瘤 | 慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病,BCR-ABL1 阳性 | 成人淋巴母细胞淋巴瘤 | 加速期慢性粒细胞白血病,BCR-ABL1 阳性 | HLA-A*0201 阳性细胞存在 | 巨细胞病毒感染 | 成人霍奇金淋巴瘤 | 成人非霍奇金淋巴瘤美国
-
Mila (bMotion Technologies)完全的
-
Universidad Autonoma de MadridCentro Universitario La Salle完全的