Assessing Feasibility of Evaluating Provider Experience With a Remote Therapeutic Monitoring Platform

: Remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) platforms were increasingly deployed in Outpatient Rehabilitation to support continuous, between-visit communication, adherence to home exercise programs, and earlier identification of clinical setbacks. While patient-facing outcomes have received growing attention, evidence describing the clinician experience of RTM; including its effects on therapeutic alliance, perceived cognitive workload, and capacity for proactive patient management remains limited. Understanding how providers perceive and integrate RTM technology into their workflows is essential to optimizing implementation, sustaining adoption, and translating digital health investment into measurable clinical value. This cross-sectional survey study tested the feasibility of evaluating the provider's experience using a digital RTM platform across three pre-specified domains: 1) therapeutic alliance, 2) work satisfaction, plus cognitive loading, and 3) proactive patient management. A secondary objective examined whether years of clinical experience or self-reported comfort with new technology were associated with provider experience or perceived workload.A cross-sectional, anonymous survey was administered to licensed physical therapists at the Outpatient Clinics, Shebin El-Kom, Menofyia governate, Egypt between 1st March, and 31th July, 2026 with a response rate of 43.4% (43/99) for the completed surveys. Eligible clinicians used the SaRA Health RTM platform for at least the previous six months prior to initiation of current study. The survey instrument combined an internally developed 8-item Likert-scale survey (0-5) targeting therapeutic alliance, proactive management, and satisfaction (Cronbach's α = 0.89) with a modified NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX; Cronbach's α = 0.86) measured the perceived workload across six domains (0-10). Cronbach's α coefficient demonstrates internal consistency, unless not construct validity or test-retest reliability. Statistical analyses included Spearman rank-order correlations and Mann-Whitney-U tests. For Mann-Whitney comparisons, results were reported as: U, p-value, group sample sizes (N1, N2), and rank-biserial r-effect size. For multiple comparisons across NASA-TLX subscales (k = 6), a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of α = .0083 was applied. Spearman correlations were reported with ρ and 95% confidence intervals.In this cross-sectional survey feasibility study, it was observed that clinician experience with the SaRA Health RTM platform was characterized by enhanced therapeutic alliance when early warning detection performed well, reduced cognitive load was observed when frustration was low, and meaningful facilitation of proactive patient management was observed among engaged users. Frustration emerged as the most actionable lever for design and implementation improvement, and self-reported digital comfort rather than years of clinical experience was the strongest clinician-level correlate of cognitive burden. These findings suggest that targeted onboarding, mentorship, and friction-reducing platform refinements may improve RTM adoption and amplify downstream benefits to patient care. Larger, multi-site, longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these signals.