Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Jogo de videogame para aliviar a ansiedade do adolescente

15 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: School of Health Sciences Geneva

Avaliando o efeito do treinamento cognitivo gamificado e do jogo casual de videogame na ansiedade em adolescentes: protocolo para um estudo controlado randomizado

Adolescence is a critical period for the onset and maintenance of anxiety disorders, which raises the importance of intervening early; one possibility of doing so is via digital interventions. At least two lines of research have been explored in the past years in this area. First, studies have tested the anxiolytic effects of casual video games, hypothesizing that, through the induction of flow, these games can effectively distract individuals from anxiety-related thoughts and feelings. Second, the bidirectional link between poor attentional control and higher anxiety has led to the design of novel interventions aiming to improve attentional control such as working memory training studies. Importantly, action video games, classified as a distinct gaming genre, have been shown to enhance attentional control. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of action video game play and casual game play to a no-training group, assessing their potential to alleviate anxiety when delivered entirely online. The goal of this three- arms randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility of a 6-week video game training intervention to reduce adolescent anxiety-related symptoms. We will also examine the efficacy of the proposed treatment when entirely deployed at adolescents' home.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Recrutamento

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

150

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

  • Nome: Naïma Gradi, PhD Student
  • Número de telefone: +33 6 31 85 49 96
  • E-mail: naima.gradi@unige.ch

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, Estados Unidos, 33199
        • Recrutamento
        • Center for Children and Families
        • Investigador principal:
          • Jeremy Pettit, PhD
        • Contato:
          • Jeremy Pettit Pr, PhD
          • Número de telefone: 305-348-1671
          • E-mail: jpettit@fiu.edu
      • Haifa, Israel
        • Recrutamento
        • University of Haifa
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Tomer Shechner, Professor
    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Suíça, 1202
        • Recrutamento
        • University of Geneva
        • Contato:
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Swann Pichon, Professor
        • Investigador principal:
          • Daphné Bavelier, Professor

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

11 anos a 15 anos (Filho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adolescents aged 11-15 years
  2. Elevated anxiety symptoms, defined as a total score of ≥15 on the 41-item parent-report version of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED).
  3. Access to a computer (at least Windows 7 or Mac OSX) at home and a reliable internet connection

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. DSM diagnoses of Bipolar, Psychosis, Autism Spectrum Disorder, present or past.
  2. Neurological injury (i.e. head injury)
  3. Currently enrolled in another cognitive training intervention

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Eco-Rescue - Attentional Control - intervention

The Eco-Rescue training intervention will be delivered through a dedicated video game installed on each participant's personal computer through the Steam platform, following a recommended training regimen of 30 minutes per day, 4 days per week for 6 weeks, for an expected total training duration of 12 hours.

Ecorescue is a gamified adaptation of the multiple object tracking task (MOT) combined with a detection task. It requires to track the spatial position of specific moving targets among visually similar moving distractors, while at the same time detecting briefly flashed events. It was designed to load on attentional control and visuo-spatial working memory. Additionally, targets may express various facial emotions (happy, angry or neutral) requiring some emotional control in addition to attentional control.

Experimental: Bejeweled 3 - Casual gaming - intervention

The Bejeweled 3 training intervention will be delivered through a dedicated video game installed on each participant's personal computer through the Steam platform, following a recommended training regimen of 30 minutes per day, 4 days per week for 6 weeks, for an expected total training duration of 12 hours.

Bejeweled 3 is a commercially available puzzle video game developed and edited by PopCap Games. The main objective is to swap two adjacent gems of seven colors to create a line or row of 3 or more gems of the same type. When these gems are aligned, they disappear, and points are earned. The goal is to get as many points as possible until it is impossible to line up gems. Bejeweled 3 offers a variety of game modes that players can freely explore at their own pace, enhancing the overall enjoyment and providing increased variability during each gaming session. These game modes typically have shorter durations, with a single game usually lasting less than 5 minutes. Bejeweled 3 was chosen as it requires fewer attentional resources compared to Eco-Rescue and because it was reported to reduce stress and anxiety in adult samples (Russoniello et al. 2009, 2013).

Sem intervenção: No-training intervention

The No-training intervention group does not involve any specific training program. Instead, participants assigned to this group will receive weekly phone calls, similar to the other groups, to answer the same questions as the other groups concerning their mental and emotional states and maintain regular contact throughout the 6-week study duration.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Anxiety assessed through the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders Child Version (SCARED-C; Birmaher et al. 1999)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The SCARED-C is a 41 items self-report anxiety questionnaire with subscales measuring General Anxiety Disorder, Social Phobia Disorder, Panic Disorder, Separation Anxiety Disorder and School Avoidance. Participants are asked to rate each statement, referring to the past four weeks, on a scale ranging from 0 (Not True or Hardly Ever True) to 2 (Very True or Often True). A score of 25 or higher may indicate the presence of an Anxiety Disorder. Analysis of primary outcome will be based on this total score.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Attentional Control assessed through the Useful Field of View Task (UFOV; Yung et al., 2015)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The UFOV is a computerized divided attention task where participants have to identify whether a briefly flashed smiley presented at the center of the screen has short or long hair and detect on which of the eight cardinal directions was a peripheral target stimulus presented, while ignoring other distractors. The presentation time is made shorter (more difficult) or longer (less difficult) according to a 3-down-1-up staircase. The task stops after 8 reversals or 72 trials, whichever happens first. Performance is measured by the mean presentation time of the last 5 trials (expressed in milliseconds). The task measures the efficiency of divided visual attention in the presence of visual distractors.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)
Attentional Control assessed through an adaptation of the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) as implemented in the ACE-X battery (Mars-UFO and Venus-UFO; https://neuroscape.ucsf.edu/researchers-ace/)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The TOVA is a computerized task where participants press a response key when presented with a visual stimulus in the upper part of the screen (go trials) and refrain from responding if flashed in the lower part of the screen (no-go trials). A first block evaluates sustained attention and a second impulsivity. In the sustained attention, go trials represent 25% of the trials; in the impulsivity block, go trials represent 75% of the trials.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)
Attentional Control assessed through the Multiple Objects Tracking Task (MOT; Yung et al., 2015)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The MOT is a computerized task in which participants are presented 16 yellow smileys moving freely within a circular area. During the first two seconds of each trial, a subset of these items is flagged as targets by being blue. Participants are instructed to track these blue smileys even though they turn back to yellow and become indistinguishable from the other items. After a few seconds, the items stop moving, one item is highlighted, and participants respond whether this item was initially flagged blue or not. MOT performance is measured as the percentage of correct responses (i.e. accuracy) in trials with 3, 4, 5 and 6 targets independently and combined overall. Higher accuracy score indicates better task performance. This task requires not only selecting targets amongst distractors but also dividing one's attention among these moving targets. Furthermore, it requires sustaining attention for a few seconds, necessitating both sustained attention and visuo-spatial working memory.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)
Affective Control assessed through the Affective Backward Digit Span Task (ABDS; modified version of Schweizer et al. 2019)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The ABDS is a computer-based task where participants are presented with digits (for 1500 ms) one after the other, and asked to recall them in reverse order. These are presented on a background of either neutral or affective images, in two different blocks, to manipulate valence. The images are sourced from the Geneva Affective Picture Database. In each trial, participants are presented with a series of single digits [0-9]. The length of the series to recall is increased or decreased by one digit depending on previous trial performance according to a 1-up-1-down staircase. No feedback is provided. After two reversals the block stops. Span is estimated for each block as the maximum correct length recalled. The span difference between the neutral versus affective blocks is an index of the individual ability to implement control in the face of affective distraction

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Emotion Regulation habits assessed through the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ; Garnefski et al., 2001)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)]

The CERQ is a 36-item self-report measure that captures stable-dispositional cognitive emotion regulation strategies when people experience stressful or threatening life experiences. Specifically, the following strategies are measured: Self-blame, blaming others, acceptance, refocusing on planning, positive refocusing, rumination, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, and catastrophizing. Each subscale comprises 4 items and uses a 5-point scale (1 = almost never, 5 = almost always); the range of scores for each subscale is 4-20. Analysis of change will be based on the total score. A higher score represents greater use of cognitive coping strategies.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)]
Subjective Attentional Control assessed through the Attention Control Scale (ACS; Derryberry et al., 2002).
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The ACS is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure the construct of attention focusing and attention shifting. 20 items are rated on a 4-point Likert Scale from 1 (almost never) to 4 (always). Respondents rate items according to their experience in the past 4 weeks. Analysis of change will be based on the total score and on scores of each subscale. A lower score indicates higher attentional control abilities.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)
Depressive symptoms assessed though the modified 8-item version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8; Kroenke et al., 2009)
Prazo: Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)

The PHQ-8 is designed to assess symptoms of depression. Participants are asked to indicate the frequency of experiencing eight specific problems or symptoms over the course of the past four weeks. (e.g., "feeling down, depressed, or hopeless," "feeling tired or having little energy,"). Each item is rated 0 (not at all), 1 (several days), 2 (more than half the days), or 3 (nearly every day). Analysis of change will be based on the total score. A higher score indicates higher depressive symptoms.

Change from baseline (T1) at 1 week after training completion (T2), and at 4 months after training completion (T3)
Sleep and Mood assessed through stand-alone questions for the duration of the training once a week.
Prazo: Over the intervention period (4 weeks up to 8 weeks)

Sleep: "During the past week, how would you rate your sleep quality overall. This question is rated from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good).

Positive mood: "How much have you experienced positive mood in the past week?" This question is rated from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

Negative mood: "How much have you experienced negative mood in the past week?" This question is rated from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

Over the intervention period (4 weeks up to 8 weeks)
Worry assessed with the following statement for the duration of the training once a week.
Prazo: Over the intervention period (4 weeks up to 8 weeks)

"During the past week I worried a lot." This item is rated 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat true), or 2 (true), and was taken from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (item 8 from the emotional problems scale, Goodman et al. 1998).

Over the intervention period (4 weeks up to 8 weeks)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Colaboradores

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Daphné Bavelier, Professor, University of Geneva, Switzerland
  • Investigador principal: Swann Pichon, Professor, HES - Geneva School of Health Science, Switzerland
  • Investigador principal: Tomer Shechner, Professor, University of Haifa

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de junho de 2024

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de outubro de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de outubro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

6 de junho de 2023

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

20 de junho de 2023

Primeira postagem (Real)

28 de junho de 2023

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

18 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

15 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 10001C_212812

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

Identifiable data will remain under the responsibility of each local study site and will not be shared between sites. Only de-identified individual participant data will be shared between participating study sites for the purposes of the planned analyses, in accordance with the approved ethical protocols, participant consent procedures, and applicable data-protection requirements.

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .