Assessing Tissue Response to High-Velocity Thrust Manipulations on Capsule Length and Stiffness at the C5-C6 Facet Joint Capsule
Assessing Tissue Response to High-Velocity Thrust Manipulations: Measuring Lasting Changes in C5-C6 Facet Joint Capsule Length With Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and Stiffness With Elastography
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Status
Condições
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
The study takes place in Marieb Hall rooms 101 and 103 of Florida Gulf Coast University. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria subjects sign the informed consent form described thoroughly on the following page. The participants undergo three recording sessions on two consecutive days. The first recording session consist of obtaining participant consent and general information, such as height and weight. The participants then has their baseline measures cervical flexion ROM, capsular length and width at both 45 and 90 degrees, and stiffness at 90 degrees, taken. The second and third session consist only of repeating these baseline measures post-manipulation and 24-hours post-manipulation respectively. Each participant will be provided a profile on the ultrasound unit, corresponding to their subject number, with each point in time having an individual exam within the profile. At these sessions, recordings are done in the prone position to measure length of the C5-C6 joint capsule and joint capsule tissue extensibility. Locating the articular pillar was a three-fold process. At the intervention table, the C7 spinous process is identified in upright sitting with palpation, due to its relevance in clinical examination and evaluation, serving as the first landmark. From this position, one of the measuring practitioners moves their finger cranially to the C6 spinous process. The participant's head is moved passively into extension, causing the spinous process to move away from the practitioner's finger, providing further confidence in location accurary. This landmark isthen marked for repeatability. The participant then has their cervical flexion range of motion measured with a fluid-filled inclinometer. A fluid-filled inclinometer utilizes gravity to quantify gross motion. This method is easily repeated and validated for clinical measurements. Each participant is given the instructions, "sit up straight and tuck your chin to your chest." At the ultrasound table, a goniometer is secured with the stationary arm in line with the table, the axis through the pivot point for the head of the table, and the moving line in line with the head of the table.
The participant is then instructed to lie prone on the table, with the head of the table positioned at 45 degrees. Anytime the head position of the table is altered, two researchers confirmed the angle of the goniometer. The 45 degree angle was selected to neutralize the natural lordosis of the lower cervical spine. The table insert is removed for the participant's face to lie within the opening. A piece of tape is placed at the base of the table opening . The participants are given the instructions, "tuck your chin and put the front of your chin on the piece of tape." From this point, the ultrasound probe is placed in a right paramedian sagittal/long-axis view. The probe was angled 15 degrees from lateral-to-medial in the posterior-to-anterior direction.
Beginning at the occipital bone, the probe is moved inferiorly. The articular pillar is known to have a jagged, sawtooth like appearance when observed from this angle. The trough at the bottom of the sawtooth indicates the inferior articular process of the cranial vertebra, while the following peak will be depicting the superior articular process of the following caudal vertebra.
This allowed the practitioners to count the peaks observed and identify the spinal levels visualized on the screen. The mark placed on the C6 spinous process is compared to probe location once the C6 level has been visualized on the screen. After the level is confirmed to be correct, the probe remained stationary on the participant. Once the correct level is visualized, the first screen capture video was taken and saved to the participant exam. The head of the table is then angled fully down towards the floor, measured at 90 degrees with the secured goniometer. By having the head of the table as far down as it allows, the process for achieving full cervical flexion remained standardized. This is also confirmed via palpation of the interspinous space of T1 and by both practitioners audibly confirming the observation of the thoracic spine flexion, indicating full cervical flexion is achieved. While the capsule could theoretically be put under more tension by utilizing multiplanar movements, utilizing only flexion offers a standardized, repeatable method that is less susceptible to confounding variables. As the probe remains stationary with the C5-C6 joint in view, the second screen capture video is taken. While remaining in the fully flexed position, the ultrasound operator start the elastography on the ultrasound unit. Once displayed on screen, a third screen capture video is taken.
The participant then returns to the initial table to receive the intervention. The practitioner performing the HVLA long axis C6-C6 manipulation on the right stands at the head of the plinth, on the right side of the patient positioned in supine. The practitioner's right hand is placed under C6, while the left hand is placed under the chin as the arm cradles the head. Using the left hand and arm, the practitioner passively rotated the head away and side-bent the head toward the targeted side. Once end-range motion is achieved, the practitioner provides a high-velocity low-amplitude long-axis thrust in a superior direction, parallel to the angle of the targeted segment.
Following the manipulation, the participant has their cervical range of motion re-measured, and the ultrasound imaging process is repeated in a new exam. Once the immediate post-intervention measures are taken, the subjects are instructed to come back for a third imaging session at the exact same time the following day. At the 24-hour follow-up, the participants cervical flexion range of motion is repeated, as well as the three ultrasound procedures.
Tipo de estudo
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Inscrição
Estágio
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Rob Sillevis, PhD
- Número de telefone: 239-7454312
- E-mail: rsillevis@fgcu.edu
Locais de estudo
-
-
Florida
-
Fort Myers, Florida, Estados Unidos, 33965
- Florida Gulf Coast University Marieb Hall 101
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy individuals between 18-35 without neck pain
- Able to to read and understand English
Exclusion Criteria:
- autoimmune disease
- down syndrome
- fusion, fracture
- spinal cord compression
- vascular pathology
- cancer,
- any other conditions that induce severe instability
- inflammation
- weakened bone.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Outro
- Alocação: N / D
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Número de braços
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / BraçoGrupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / TratamentoIntervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sample
C5-C6 long axis joint manipulation
|
Long axis trust manipulation C5-C6
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
facet capsule length and width
Prazo: before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
|
MSK US measure facet length and with in mm
|
before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Cervical motion
Prazo: before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
|
Max neck flexion motion in sitting measured in degrees
|
before intervention, immediately after, and at 24 hour follow up
|
|
elastography
Prazo: Before intervention, immediately after, and 24 hours after
|
tissue pliability assessment with MSK US
|
Before intervention, immediately after, and 24 hours after
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- 1. Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, Cote P, Haldeman S. The global spine care initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Euro Spine Journ. 2018;27(1):796-801. 2. Brown S. Distracted doctoring. Springer Cham; 2017 3. Herzog W. The biomechanics of spinal manipulation. Journ Body and Move Ther. 2010;14(3):280-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.03.004 4. Olson KA. Manual Physical Therapy of the Spine. Elsevier - Health Science; 2021. 5. Pettman E. A history of manipulative therapy. Journ of Man & Manip Ther. 2007;15(3):165-174. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698107790819873 6. Giacalone A, Febbi M, Magnifica F, Ruberti E. The effect of high velocity low amplitude cervical manipulations on the musculoskeletal system: literature review. Cureus. 2020;12(4). doi: 10.7759/cureus.7682 7. Young IA, Pozzi F, Dunning J, Linkonis R, Michener LA. Immediate and short-term effects of thoracic spine manipulation in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. JOSPT. 2019;49(5):299-309. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8150 8. Reggars JW. The manipulative crack. Journ Chiro Osteo Coll of Aust. 1996;5(2):39-44. doi: 9. Manning A, Butts R, Dunning J. Audible pop during spinal manipulation: plausible mechanisms and clinical relevance. AAMT. June 21, 2016. Accessed October 14, 2024. https://spinalmanipulation.org/2016/06/21/audible-popping-during-spinal-manipulation-plausible-mechanisms-and-clinical-relevance/ 10. Moorman AC. Impact of audible pops associated with spinal manipulation on perceived pain; a systematic review. Chiro and Manual Ther. 2022;30(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00454-0 11. Smith J, Finnoff JT. Diagnostic and interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound: Part 1. fundamentals. PM&R. 2009;1(1):64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.09.001 12. Moreno B, Barbosa J. Ultrasound-guided procedures in the cervical spine. Cureus. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20361 13. Vasiliadis ES, Grivas TB, Kaspiris A. Histo
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão Primária
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Conclusão do estudo
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Primeira postagem
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última Atualização Postada
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2025-10 (Istanbul Medipol University Scientific Research Projects Commission)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .