此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery

2026年11月3日 更新者:Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael、Beni-Suef University

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Patients With Fracture Neck of Femur Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare two different nerve block techniques-the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)-for managing pain after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients.

Hip fractures are common in older adults and often cause significant pain. Managing this pain effectively helps patients recover faster and move around sooner after surgery. Traditional pain relief options include nerve blocks and strong pain medications (opioids). However, opioids can cause unwanted side effects like nausea and drowsiness, while some traditional nerve blocks can weaken the leg muscles, making early walking difficult.

Nerve blocks inject a local anesthetic (numbing medication) around specific nerves or within muscle layers to temporarily block pain signals:

  1. PENG Block: Targets the specific sensory nerves supplying the front of the hip joint while minimizing leg muscle weakness.
  2. Lumbar ESPB: Injects numbing medication near the lower spine to block pain signals coming from the hip region.

Participants in this study will include adults aged 60 and older undergoing hip surgery for a femoral neck fracture under spinal anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive either the PENG block or the Lumbar ESPB before their surgery. Both blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance to ensure precise medication placement.

Researchers will compare:

  • Pain levels at rest and during movement over the first 48 hours after surgery.
  • The total amount of additional pain medication (opioids) required.
  • Leg muscle (quadriceps) strength after surgery.
  • Any side effects or complications, as well as the overall length of hospital stay.

The findings from this study will help doctors determine which nerve block provides better pain relief while preserving leg strength, aiding in safer and faster recovery for elderly patients after hip surgery.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:

Hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and functional decline. Effective perioperative analgesia is crucial for early recovery. While systemic opioids and conventional nerve blocks (such as femoral or fascia iliaca blocks) provide pain relief, they are often limited by quadriceps weakness, opioid-related side effects, and delayed mobilization.

The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block targets the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves supplying the anterior hip capsule, offering motor-sparing analgesia. The lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) is a paraspinal fascial plane block allowing craniocaudal local anesthetic spread to dorsal and ventral rami. Head-to-head evidence comparing L-ESPB and PENG blocks in patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing hip surgery remains limited.

STUDY PROTOCOL & INTERVENTIONS:

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates elderly patients (age ≥60 years, ASA II-III) undergoing hip surgery (hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) under spinal anesthesia.

Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either:

  1. Group P: Ultrasound-guided PENG block using 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.
  2. Group E: Ultrasound-guided L-ESPB at L3/L4 level using 25-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.

Blocks are performed 20 minutes preoperatively by a dedicated anesthetist not involved in outcome assessment. All patients receive standardized intraoperative spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia (scheduled IV/oral paracetamol with IV pethidine as rescue analgesia). Pain scores at rest and on movement, cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption, quadriceps strength (MRC scale), block-related complications, and length of hospital stay will be evaluated.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

64

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

      • Banī Suwayf、埃及、62515
        • Beni-Suef University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

60年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 60 years or older.
  2. Unilateral fracture neck of femur scheduled for hip surgery (hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) under spinal anesthesia (with or without light sedation).
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III.
  4. Ability to understand and use Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scoring and to provide informed consent (or availability of a legally authorized representative according to local regulations).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal to participate.
  2. Coagulopathy (platelet count < 100,000/µL, INR > 1.4) or ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation that precludes deep peripheral or neuraxial blocks per current guidelines.
  3. Infection at the injection site, systemic sepsis, or hemodynamic instability.
  4. Pre-existing significant neurological deficit in the involved lower limb, advanced peripheral neuropathy, or cognitive impairment precluding reliable pain assessment.
  5. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics or study medications.
  6. Severe chronic opioid use (defined as > 30 mg oral morphine equivalent daily for > 3 months).
  7. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² if considered to significantly hinder ultrasound visualization, at investigator discretion.
  8. Prior hip surgery on the same side or severe anatomical hip deformity affecting block performance.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:PENG Block

Patients receive an ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block preoperatively using 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (50-62.5 mg) deposited in the fascial plane between the iliopsoas tendon and pubic ramus near the iliopubical eminence (IPE). Standard spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia are administered.

Ultrasound-guided nerve block performed 20 minutes preoperatively in the supine position. A 22G echogenic needle is directed in-plane lateral-to-medial to target the fascial plane deep to the iliopsoas tendon. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection (2-3 mL saline), 20-25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% (or 15-20 mL in frail/small patients) is injected in 3-5 mL aliquots.

其他名称:
  • 彭块
有源比较器:Lumbar ESPB

Patients receive an ultrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB) preoperatively at the L3 or L4 transverse process level using 25-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5-75 mg) deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle. Standard spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia are administered.

Ultrasound-guided fascial plane block performed 20 minutes preoperatively in the lateral decubitus or sitting position. A 22G echogenic needle is advanced in-plane cranial-to-caudal to contact the L3 or L4 transverse process. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection confirming muscle lifting, 25-30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% is injected in 3-5 mL aliquots.

其他名称:
  • L-ESPB
  • Lumbar ESPB

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Postoperative Pain Score on Movement at 12 Hours
大体时间:12 hours after the end of surgery

Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Pain is evaluated during gentle passive leg movement (flexion or rotation) of the operated limb.

12 hours after the end of surgery

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Postoperative Pain Scores at Rest and Movement at Specified Time Points
大体时间:30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery

Pain intensity measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain) at rest and during gentle passive movement of the operated limb.

30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery
Cumulative Opioid Consumption in the First 24 Hours
大体时间:First 24 hours postoperatively

Total dose of intravenous pethidine (meperidine) administered as rescue analgesia in milligrams (mg).

First 24 hours postoperatively
Time to First Rescue Analgesic Request
大体时间:Up to 48 hours postoperatively

Duration of time measured in hours from the end of surgery until the patient requests the first dose of rescue IV pethidine.

Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps Motor Function (Knee Extension Strength)
大体时间:At 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively

Evaluation of ipsilateral quadriceps muscle strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal strength). Motor weakness is defined as an MRC grade ≤ 3/5.

At 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Incidence of Block-Related Complications and Opioid-Related Adverse Events
大体时间:Up to 48 hours postoperatively

Percentage of participants experiencing adverse events including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, urinary retention, hypotension, bradycardia, signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), hematoma, injection site infection, neurological deficit/nerve injury, or falls.

Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Length of Hospital Stay
大体时间:From date of surgery until hospital discharge (up to approximately 30 days)

Duration of time from surgery completion until discharge from the hospital, measured in total days.

From date of surgery until hospital discharge (up to approximately 30 days)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年11月5日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年4月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年5月15日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年10月27日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年10月27日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年11月2日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年11月4日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年11月3日

最后验证

2026年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • FMBSUREC/07062026b/ Mikhael

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

Individual de-identified participant data underlying the published primary and secondary results (including demographic data, baseline characteristics, NRS pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, quadriceps motor strength scores, and adverse events) will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified academic researchers.

IPD 共享时间框架

Data will become available starting 6 months following publication of the primary manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal and will remain accessible for up to 3 years.

IPD 共享访问标准

Data will be shared with researchers whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee or the principal investigator to achieve the aims of an approved scientific proposal. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator (Dr. Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael) via email. A signed Data Use Agreement (DUA) may be required.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.