Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery

3 de noviembre de 2026 actualizado por: Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael, Beni-Suef University

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Patients With Fracture Neck of Femur Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare two different nerve block techniques-the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)-for managing pain after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients.

Hip fractures are common in older adults and often cause significant pain. Managing this pain effectively helps patients recover faster and move around sooner after surgery. Traditional pain relief options include nerve blocks and strong pain medications (opioids). However, opioids can cause unwanted side effects like nausea and drowsiness, while some traditional nerve blocks can weaken the leg muscles, making early walking difficult.

Nerve blocks inject a local anesthetic (numbing medication) around specific nerves or within muscle layers to temporarily block pain signals:

  1. PENG Block: Targets the specific sensory nerves supplying the front of the hip joint while minimizing leg muscle weakness.
  2. Lumbar ESPB: Injects numbing medication near the lower spine to block pain signals coming from the hip region.

Participants in this study will include adults aged 60 and older undergoing hip surgery for a femoral neck fracture under spinal anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive either the PENG block or the Lumbar ESPB before their surgery. Both blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance to ensure precise medication placement.

Researchers will compare:

  • Pain levels at rest and during movement over the first 48 hours after surgery.
  • The total amount of additional pain medication (opioids) required.
  • Leg muscle (quadriceps) strength after surgery.
  • Any side effects or complications, as well as the overall length of hospital stay.

The findings from this study will help doctors determine which nerve block provides better pain relief while preserving leg strength, aiding in safer and faster recovery for elderly patients after hip surgery.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:

Hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and functional decline. Effective perioperative analgesia is crucial for early recovery. While systemic opioids and conventional nerve blocks (such as femoral or fascia iliaca blocks) provide pain relief, they are often limited by quadriceps weakness, opioid-related side effects, and delayed mobilization.

The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block targets the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves supplying the anterior hip capsule, offering motor-sparing analgesia. The lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) is a paraspinal fascial plane block allowing craniocaudal local anesthetic spread to dorsal and ventral rami. Head-to-head evidence comparing L-ESPB and PENG blocks in patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing hip surgery remains limited.

STUDY PROTOCOL & INTERVENTIONS:

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates elderly patients (age ≥60 years, ASA II-III) undergoing hip surgery (hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) under spinal anesthesia.

Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either:

  1. Group P: Ultrasound-guided PENG block using 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.
  2. Group E: Ultrasound-guided L-ESPB at L3/L4 level using 25-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.

Blocks are performed 20 minutes preoperatively by a dedicated anesthetist not involved in outcome assessment. All patients receive standardized intraoperative spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia (scheduled IV/oral paracetamol with IV pethidine as rescue analgesia). Pain scores at rest and on movement, cumulative 24-hour opioid consumption, quadriceps strength (MRC scale), block-related complications, and length of hospital stay will be evaluated.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

64

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael, MD
  • Número de teléfono: 00201288549959
  • Correo electrónico: Kmnmk87@med.bsu.edu.eg

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Banī Suwayf, Egipto, 62515
        • Beni-Suef University Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

60 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 60 years or older.
  2. Unilateral fracture neck of femur scheduled for hip surgery (hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty) under spinal anesthesia (with or without light sedation).
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III.
  4. Ability to understand and use Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scoring and to provide informed consent (or availability of a legally authorized representative according to local regulations).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal to participate.
  2. Coagulopathy (platelet count < 100,000/µL, INR > 1.4) or ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation that precludes deep peripheral or neuraxial blocks per current guidelines.
  3. Infection at the injection site, systemic sepsis, or hemodynamic instability.
  4. Pre-existing significant neurological deficit in the involved lower limb, advanced peripheral neuropathy, or cognitive impairment precluding reliable pain assessment.
  5. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics or study medications.
  6. Severe chronic opioid use (defined as > 30 mg oral morphine equivalent daily for > 3 months).
  7. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² if considered to significantly hinder ultrasound visualization, at investigator discretion.
  8. Prior hip surgery on the same side or severe anatomical hip deformity affecting block performance.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: PENG Block

Patients receive an ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block preoperatively using 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (50-62.5 mg) deposited in the fascial plane between the iliopsoas tendon and pubic ramus near the iliopubical eminence (IPE). Standard spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia are administered.

Ultrasound-guided nerve block performed 20 minutes preoperatively in the supine position. A 22G echogenic needle is directed in-plane lateral-to-medial to target the fascial plane deep to the iliopsoas tendon. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection (2-3 mL saline), 20-25 mL bupivacaine 0.25% (or 15-20 mL in frail/small patients) is injected in 3-5 mL aliquots.

Otros nombres:
  • Bloque PENG
Comparador activo: Lumbar ESPB

Patients receive an ultrasound-guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB) preoperatively at the L3 or L4 transverse process level using 25-30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5-75 mg) deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle. Standard spinal anesthesia and postoperative multimodal systemic analgesia are administered.

Ultrasound-guided fascial plane block performed 20 minutes preoperatively in the lateral decubitus or sitting position. A 22G echogenic needle is advanced in-plane cranial-to-caudal to contact the L3 or L4 transverse process. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection confirming muscle lifting, 25-30 mL bupivacaine 0.25% is injected in 3-5 mL aliquots.

Otros nombres:
  • L-ESPB
  • Lumbar ESPB

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Postoperative Pain Score on Movement at 12 Hours
Periodo de tiempo: 12 hours after the end of surgery

Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Pain is evaluated during gentle passive leg movement (flexion or rotation) of the operated limb.

12 hours after the end of surgery

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Postoperative Pain Scores at Rest and Movement at Specified Time Points
Periodo de tiempo: 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery

Pain intensity measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain) at rest and during gentle passive movement of the operated limb.

30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery
Cumulative Opioid Consumption in the First 24 Hours
Periodo de tiempo: First 24 hours postoperatively

Total dose of intravenous pethidine (meperidine) administered as rescue analgesia in milligrams (mg).

First 24 hours postoperatively
Time to First Rescue Analgesic Request
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 hours postoperatively

Duration of time measured in hours from the end of surgery until the patient requests the first dose of rescue IV pethidine.

Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Quadriceps Motor Function (Knee Extension Strength)
Periodo de tiempo: At 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively

Evaluation of ipsilateral quadriceps muscle strength using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal strength). Motor weakness is defined as an MRC grade ≤ 3/5.

At 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Incidence of Block-Related Complications and Opioid-Related Adverse Events
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 48 hours postoperatively

Percentage of participants experiencing adverse events including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, urinary retention, hypotension, bradycardia, signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), hematoma, injection site infection, neurological deficit/nerve injury, or falls.

Up to 48 hours postoperatively
Length of Hospital Stay
Periodo de tiempo: From date of surgery until hospital discharge (up to approximately 30 days)

Duration of time from surgery completion until discharge from the hospital, measured in total days.

From date of surgery until hospital discharge (up to approximately 30 days)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

5 de noviembre de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de abril de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

15 de mayo de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

27 de octubre de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de octubre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

2 de noviembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

4 de noviembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

3 de noviembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • FMBSUREC/07062026b/ Mikhael

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual de-identified participant data underlying the published primary and secondary results (including demographic data, baseline characteristics, NRS pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, quadriceps motor strength scores, and adverse events) will be made available upon reasonable request to qualified academic researchers.

Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD

Data will become available starting 6 months following publication of the primary manuscript in a peer-reviewed journal and will remain accessible for up to 3 years.

Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD

Data will be shared with researchers whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee or the principal investigator to achieve the aims of an approved scientific proposal. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator (Dr. Kerollos Moneer Neseem Mikhael) via email. A signed Data Use Agreement (DUA) may be required.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
  • SAVIA

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .