Improving Health and Reducing Disability of Depressed Elderly With Chronic Conditions Through Qigong Exercise
2018年7月18日 更新者：TSANG Hector Wing-Hong、The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Improving Health and Reducing Disability of Depressed Elderly With Chronic Conditions Through Qigong Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Qigong exercise is beneficial for older adults with co-occurring chronic physical illness and depression in terms of psychological and physical outcomes.
However, the effects on functional independence, sleep quality, and mobility of depressive older adults remain unclear.
It is also important to replicate its benefits for subjective well-being and muscle strength.
A randomized clinical trial was conducted among older adults who were aged 60 or above and with chronic medical conditions for one year.
After random assignment, intervention group (n = 25) went through qigong exercise twice a week and for 12 weeks,whereas control group (n = 22) was involved in cognitive training activities with mobilization elements.
The psychosocial and physical outcomes of the two groups were compared.
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
47
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
-
Hong Kong、香港
- The Hong Kong Polytechinic University
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
60年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged 60 or above
- have been suffering from chronic medical conditions for more than one year
- have depressive symptoms as indicated by Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS ≥ 6)
Exclusion Criteria:
- have practiced or received training of any form of mind-body exercises (including tai chi, yoga, and qigong) during the 6 months prior to intervention.
- have changed medication or the dosage prior to or during intervention
- have obvious cognitive and language impairment or score less than 20 in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
- undergo electroconvulsive therapy, psychotherapy, or psychoeducation
- cannot demonstrate satisfactory sitting balance
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：治疗
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器：认知训练
|
通过需要动员的活动进行记忆和执行功能的认知训练
|
|
实验性的：气功训练
|
Eight-Section Brocades
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Personal Well-Being Index (PWI)
大体时间：the change from baseline to the completion of intervention (12 weeks later)
|
It is measured by the 8-item scale of Personal Well-Being Index (PWI).
Each item was rated according to an 11-point scale ranging from '0' (extremely dissatisfied) to '10' (extremely satisfied).
An overall score of PWI score was the sum of all items.
The overall score ranges from 0 to 110, with higher score indicating higher subjective well-being.
|
the change from baseline to the completion of intervention (12 weeks later)
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
匹兹堡睡眠质量指数 (PSQI)
大体时间：基线、基线后 12 周和基线后 16 周
|
它由匹兹堡睡眠质量指数 (PSQI) 衡量。
它有 19 个项目测量睡眠质量的 7 个组成部分，总分是所有组成部分得分的总和。
总分范围从 0 到 21，得分越低表示睡眠质量越好。
|
基线、基线后 12 周和基线后 16 周
|
|
握力
大体时间：基线、基线后 12 周和基线后 16 周
|
它是用 Jamar 手持式测力计测量的。
参与者进行了左手和右手握力的三个试验，每只手的最终结果计算为三个试验的平均表现。
得分越高表示握力越强。
|
基线、基线后 12 周和基线后 16 周
|
|
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
大体时间：baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
|
It is measured by the 18-item scale of Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
Based on a 7-point scale for rating (1 = totally unable; 7 = totally independent), a total score of FIM ranges from 18 to 126 was generated.
Higher total score indicates less disability.
|
baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
|
|
Timed up and Go Test (TUG)
大体时间：baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
|
Timed up and Go Test (TUG) is used to measure mobility.
During the test, participants were sitting on a chair, and then they were required to stand up, walk to a mark which is 3 meters away from the chair, go back to the chair from the mark, and sit down again.
The time each participant spent to complete the above series of actions was recorded.
Participants performed the test for three times, and their final scores were the average of the three.
And lower score indicates better mobility.
|
baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2015年10月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2017年3月31日
研究完成 (实际的)
2017年5月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2018年6月26日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2018年7月8日
首次发布 (实际的)
2018年7月19日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2018年7月20日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2018年7月18日
最后验证
2018年7月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.
认知训练的临床试验
-
Karolinska InstitutetMinistry of Health and Social Affairs, Sweden完全的
-
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, DenmarkCopenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research; Center for Clinical Intervention...完全的