实施全球共识以防止男大学生性暴力的策略 (SCALE)

实验性的：学生

任一随机分组的学生都将成为 GlobalConsent 的积极消费者，并通过电子邮件介绍该计划、流程、交付时间表、数据收集程序和同意。

行为的：学生低强度实施策略（LIS）

LIS 小组的学生将收到 GlobalConsent 的基本实施策略，该策略通常用于在美国大学提供在线课程，并以预定频率发送 12 周的电子邮件/短信完成提醒。

其他名称：

• LIS-学生

行为的：High-intensity implementation strategies (HIS)-Students

Students in the HIS group will receive educational outreach in a pre-implementation orientation to GlobalConsent, covering similar topics and three monthly one-hour learning sessions during implementation in which technical questions about program access or progression can be addressed; more intensive intervention to enhance adherence with more frequent email/Short Message Service (SMS), completion reminders; and demand generation encouraging program completion.

其他名称：

• HIS-学生

实验性的：学院

教师将获得基于大学随机化实施策略组的教育材料。

其他：教师高强度实施策略（HIS）

• 被动访问基于网络的教育材料
• 市政厅 (3) 设有一般部门来定义性暴力；年轻人的比率；整个生命过程中的急性/慢性影响；一级预防循证干预措施（EBI）

其他名称：

• HIS-教师

其他：教师低强度实施策略（LIS）

被动访问基于网络的教育材料

其他名称：

• LIS-师资队伍

实验性的：领导者

领导者将收到基于实施策略组的特定地点（大学）邀请和材料。

其他：领导者高强度实施策略（HIS）

• 特定站点邀请参加
• 被动访问基于网络的教育材料
• 一场定义性暴力的实施前网络研讨会；越南年轻人的比率；生命过程中的急性/慢性影响；一级预防 EBI；回顾项目描述和协作；共享 GlobalConsent 网站以被动访问教育材料
• 受过培训的内部协调员每月向大学领导发送电子邮件，介绍实施进度的最新情况
• 一次实施后网络研讨会，分享匿名调查结果（由 IS 小组主持）；讨论维持计划（包括如何处理现有大学咨询中心性暴力报告的指导）

其他名称：

• HIS-领导者

其他：领导者低强度实施策略 (LIS)

• 特定站点邀请参加
• 被动访问基于网络的教育材料
• 一场定义性暴力的实施前网络研讨会；越南年轻人的比率；生命过程中的急性/慢性影响；一级预防 EBI；回顾项目描述和协作；共享 GlobalConsent 网站以被动访问教育材料

其他名称：

• LIS-领导者

实验性的：实施团队成员

实施团队成员将根据大学特定的实施策略小组被动访问基于网络的材料和培训。

其他：实施团队成员的高强度实施策略 (HIS)

• 被动访问基于网络的教育材料
• 在校园范围内实施 GlobalConsent 的现场技术培训； GlobalConsent方案的讨论和论证；标准化实施手册
• 面对面的领导力培训，以支持内部利益相关者（领导者、实施团队、教师、学生）的 GlobalConsent；领导风格；管理团队；未经授权的影响；管理冲突；情商；谈判;引领变革
• 每两周一次（六次）1 小时录制的质量改进团队网络研讨会，提供复习培训；评估实施进度；评估修改；建立对等网络；提供实施进度的匿名数据以供讨论

其他名称：

• HIS-实施团队成员

其他：低强度实施策略 (LIS) 实施团队成员

• 被动访问基于网络的教育材料
• 在校园范围内实施 GlobalConsent 的现场技术培训； GlobalConsent方案的讨论和论证；标准化实施手册

其他名称：

• LIS 实施团队成员

Students' Reported Prosocial Bystander Behavior

Students will be asked if they had engaged in any of seven prosocial bystander behaviors in the past 3 months (or since the last time completing the questionnaire). Items are scored as 0 = never performed, 1 = performed once, 2 = performed more than once. The numbers of participants who report engaging in at least one of seven prosocial bystander behaviors at least once are presented here.

Students' reported Sexually Violent Behavior

The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) is an assessment tool used to measure the prevalence of sexual aggression. It is designed to measure the frequency and severity of sexual aggression acts committed by an individual. The SES is a self-report questionnaire developed by researchers at the University of Michigan. The Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization is a multi-item measure to assess unwanted sexual victimization. Surveys will be provided every six months for up to 30 months.

残疾评估和时间表

仅限学生：残疾评估将使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) 进行评估，这是一种适用于所有疾病的健康和残疾通用评估工具，包括精神、神经和成瘾性疾病，适用于临床和一般人群设置。 它是衡量六个领域的残疾程度和功能的工具。 答案按照从 0（无）到 4（极端或不能做）的等级对每个问题进行评分。

评分方法有简单评分、复杂评分、平均评分三种。 简单分数是每个问题的评分之和。 复杂分数是评分之和乘以权重因子。 平均分是每个领域评分的平均值。

诊断和统计手册 (DSM)-5 交叉症状测量

仅限学生：DSM-5 自评 1 级交叉症状测量 - 成人是一款旨在评估对各种精神病诊断非常重要的心理健康领域的工具。 它由 23 个问题组成，评估 13 个精神领域，例如抑郁、焦虑、躯体症状等。 该措施中的每个项目均按 5 分制评分（0 = 无或根本没有；1 = 轻微或罕见，少于一两天；2 = 轻微或数天；3 = 中等或超过一半）天；4=严重或几乎每天）。 对某个领域内的任何项目的温和（即 2）或更高评级可能会指导额外的询问和后续行动，以确定是否有必要对该领域进行更详细的评估。 在特定领域持续高分可能表明个体有明显的问题症状，可能需要进一步评估、治疗和随访

酒精障碍知识/酒精对认知的影响

仅学生：此表格询问受访者对5个与酒精有关的问题的共识或分歧，重点是决策，行为和性暴力。 它使用从“完全不同意”到“完全同意”的5点李克特评估协议或分歧。

Perceptions of Sexual Violence form at their respective university

Perceptions of sexual violence will be assessed by respondents' rating their level of agreement with 3 statements regarding the frequency and impact of sexual violence at their university using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Implementation Team Scale for staff and supervisors

Leadership in implementation teams is assessed using two scales, one for implementation team supervisors, and one for implementation team staff. Each scale has 13 items and uses a 5-point Likert ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree" to assess respondent's agreement on statements about their team supervisor (for staff) or themselves (for supervisors).

Cultural Exchange Inventory

For implementation team members only: The Cultural Exchange Inventory assesses the teamwork landscape of GlobalConsent implementation teams using 7 items. Respondents give their level of agreement, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree," on statements such as "The implementation team is working well together to implement GlobalConsent" and "My colleagues are devoting a lot of time and energy to maintain the collaboration of the implementation team.

College Date Rape Attitudes & Behaviors Scale

For implementation team members only: The College Date Rape Attitude Survey (CDRAS), a measure intended to assess attitudes related to the risk of committing rape in adolescents and young adults, the CDRAS measures four rape-related attitudes: Entitlement, Blame Shifting, Traditional Roles, and Overwhelming Sexual Arousal. The CDRAS contains 20 items measuring attitudes toward date rape. All items require responses on a 5-point Likert scale. The responses for the attitude scale are strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree. Scoring is reversed for appropriate items; so that high scores (5) always correspond to the most desirable (rape-related) responses.

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Programming to Prevent Sexually Violent Behavior among Students

This scale assesses respondents' attitudes towards sexual violence prevention programming by asking them to rate their level of agreement with 10 statements, such as "Implementing sexual violence prevention programming with students at our university is something I support," "...addresses a relevant problem among our students," "…would be easy for students to participate in." These statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of GlobalConsent

This scale assesses respondents' attitudes towards the GlobalConsent program specifically by asking them to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with 10 statements, such as "Implementing GlobalConsent with students at our university is something I support," "...addresses a relevant problem among our students," "…would be easy for students to participate in." these statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Sexual Violence Legality and Harm (Information about Sexual Activity)

Knowledge of the law is assessed with 12 items where respondents indicate if they think the situations described are illegal (scored as 1), legal, but harmful (2), or legal and not harmful (3), with example items including "Forcing a person to have oral sex" and "Pressuring someone to have sex." Items will be re-coded such that responses indicating an accurate estimate or overestimate of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as "1" and items indicating an underestimation of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as "0".

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Active Consent (Information about Sexual Consent)

This form adapted the Sexual Consent Scale to ask respondents to rate their level of agreement with 12 statements about sexual consent using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". It includes statements such as "If a person consents to sex, one can continue sexual contact even if the person changes their mind," and "Obtaining consent for sex is just as necessary in a long-term relationship as in a new relationship."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Rejection of Rape Myths (Attitudes about Sexual Situations)

This form is a combination of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale and the College Date Rape Attitudes & Behaviors Scale. This assesses attitudes towards sexual assault and rape by asking respondents to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with 15 statements using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". Statements include "If a woman dresses in a sexy dress, she is asking for sex," and "When guys rape, it is usually because of their strong desire for sex."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Perceptions of Campus Attitudes

This form assesses the perceptions of respondents in their university's faculty and leaders' potential response to sexual violence on their university campus. Questions ask about behaviors of abuse, sexual assault, and stalking, and their level of agreement or disagreement with whether faculty and leaders would believe a student reporting experiencing these behaviors, respect a student who reported experiencing these behaviors, or admire a student intervening in these behaviors. Agreement is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree"

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 34 months, and 49 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Empathy for Rape Victims

Students only: Empathy for rape victims will be assessed with a modified version of the Rape Empathy Scale (RES). This assessment includes 10 items where participants were asked to choose between two statements, one of which reflected greater empathy towards rapists ("I understand the helplessness a rapist might feel during a rape since he cannot control his actions") and one of which reflected greater empathy towards victims ("I understand the helplessness a victim might feel during a rape"). Responses are scored as 1 (more empathy for victim) or 0 (more empathy for perpetrator) and total scores range from 0 to 10 where higher scores indicate more empathy towards rape victims.

Sexual Communication Attitudes

Students only: This is a 7-item scale measuring agreement or disagreement with statements focusing on sexual communication. Agreement and disagreement is assessed using a 5-point Likert ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree."

Bystander Self-Efficacy

Students only: Bystander Self-Efficacy will be measured using the Bystander Efficacy Scale, which was developed for a project that evaluated the effectiveness of a sexual violence prevention program based on preventing antecedents to sexual violence by increasing prosocial bystander behavior. On this measure, participants are asked to indicate their confidence, on a 3-point scale, in performing each of 10 bystander behaviors (e.g., "Speak up to a guy who is making excuses for using physical force in a sexual relationship."). Scores are created by subtracting the mean of the 10 items from 100 to create a scale of perceived ineffectiveness; thus, higher scores indicate lesser effectiveness.

Bystander Intention to Intervene (Readiness to Intervene)

Students only: Readiness to Intervene will be measured using three intent-to-help subscales.

• Intent to Help Friend Scale: Sexual Abuse
• Intent to Help Friend Scale: Intimate Partner Violence Intent to help is an attitude that is related to bystander action. Participants will be asked how likely they are to take different bystander actions.

The second Intent to Help subscale focuses on participants' intent to help strangers in both sexual abuse and intimate partner abuse situations.

Responses range from 1 (not at all likely) to 5 (extremely likely). The average is calculated from the answers across the items to score this measure.

Severity Measure for Depression

Students only: Depression will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9): The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. The PHQ-9 is completed by the participant in minutes and is rapidly scored by a clinician. The PHQ-9 can also be administered repeatedly, which can reflect the improvement or the worsening of depression in response to treatment. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Students will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), which is a quick and easy tool to help identify patients with anxiety and monitor treatment response. The GAD-7 has been validated as a diagnostic tool and a severity assessment scale. The scale consists of 7 items. The total score can range from 0 to 21, and it indicates the severity of anxiety as follows:

0 to 4: Minimal anxiety 5 to 9: Mild anxiety 10 to 14: Moderate anxiety 15 to 21: Severe anxiety

Students' Proactive Bystander Behavior Scale

This scale asks respondents to indicate whether and how often they completed proactive bystander behavior actions in the last 6 months (the time between each survey wave). Behaviors include "I have encouraged others to learn more and get involved in preventing sexual or dating violence," and "I have told guys not to talk about women in sexually degrading ways," and response options for each statement are (0) No, I have not done this in the last 6 months, (1) Yes, once in the last 6 months, and (2) Yes, more than once in the last 6 months.

Students' Reactive Bystander Action Scale

This scale asks respondents whether and how often they completed reactive bystander behavior actions in the last 6 months (the time between each survey wave). Actions include "I have expressed concern or offered help to a woman who said she had an unwanted sexual experience but didn't call it 'rape'," "I have reported formally to an authority a guy who used physical force against a women," and "I have intervened with a guy's action because I wanted to stop an act of sexual violence." Responses options for each statement are (0) I experienced this situation in the last 6 months and did NOT act, (1) Yes, once in the last 6 months, (2) Yes, more than once in the last 6 months, and (9) I did NOT experience any situation like this in the last 6 months.