Strategie pro implementaci GlobalConsent k prevenci sexuálního násilí u univerzitních mužů (SCALE)

Experimentální: Studenti

Studenti v obou randomizovaných skupinách se stanou aktivními spotřebiteli GlobalConsent s e-mailovým úvodem do programu, procesu, harmonogramu doručení, postupů sběru dat a souhlasu.

Behaviorální: Strategie implementace nízké intenzity (LIS) pro studenty

Studenti ve skupině LIS obdrží základní implementační strategie GlobalConsent, které se často používají k poskytování online programů na univerzitách v USA, s upozorněním na dokončení e-mailem/SMS s předem stanovenou frekvencí po dobu 12 týdnů.

Ostatní jména:

• LIS-Studenti

Behaviorální: High-intensity implementation strategies (HIS)-Students

Students in the HIS group will receive educational outreach in a pre-implementation orientation to GlobalConsent, covering similar topics and three monthly one-hour learning sessions during implementation in which technical questions about program access or progression can be addressed; more intensive intervention to enhance adherence with more frequent email/Short Message Service (SMS), completion reminders; and demand generation encouraging program completion.

Ostatní jména:

• JEHO-studenti

Experimentální: Fakulta

Fakulta získá přístup ke vzdělávacím materiálům založeným na univerzitní skupině pro implementaci randomizačních strategií.

Jiný: Vysoce intenzivní implementační strategie (HIS) pro fakultu

• Pasivní přístup k webovým vzdělávacím materiálům
• Radnice (3) s obecnou fakultou definovat sexuální násilí; sazby u mladých lidí; akutní/chronické účinky v průběhu života; primární preventivní intervence založené na důkazech (EBI)

Ostatní jména:

• JEHO fakulta

Jiný: Strategie implementace nízké intenzity (LIS) pro fakultu

Pasivní přístup k webovým vzdělávacím materiálům

Ostatní jména:

• LIS-fakulta

Experimentální: Vedoucí

Vedoucí obdrží pozvánky a materiály specifické pro dané místo (univerzita) na základě skupiny pro implementační strategie.

Jiný: Vysoce intenzivní implementační strategie (HIS) pro lídry

• Pozvánka k účasti pro konkrétní web
• Pasivní přístup k webovým vzdělávacím materiálům
• Jeden předimplementační webinář k definici sexuálního násilí; míry mezi mladými lidmi ve Vietnamu; akutní/chronické účinky v průběhu života; primární prevence EBI; rekapitulace popisu projektu a spolupráce; sdílejte web GlobalConsent pro pasivní přístup ke vzdělávacím materiálům
• Měsíční e-maily od vyškolených interních facilitátorů univerzitním vedoucím s aktualizacemi o průběhu implementace
• Jeden webinář po implementaci pro sdílení anonymizovaných zjištění (podle skupiny IS); prodiskutujte plán pro udržení (včetně pokynů, jak zvládnout hlášení sexuálního násilí ve stávajících univerzitních poradenských centrech)

Ostatní jména:

• JEHO vůdci

Jiný: Strategie implementace nízké intenzity (LIS) pro lídry

• Pozvánka k účasti pro konkrétní web
• Pasivní přístup k webovým vzdělávacím materiálům
• Jeden předimplementační webinář k definici sexuálního násilí; míry mezi mladými lidmi ve Vietnamu; akutní/chronické účinky v průběhu života; primární prevence EBI; rekapitulace popisu projektu a spolupráce; sdílejte web GlobalConsent pro pasivní přístup ke vzdělávacím materiálům

Ostatní jména:

• LIS-Leaders

Experimentální: Členové realizačního týmu

Členové realizačního týmu získají pasivní přístup k webovým materiálům a školení podle skupiny pro implementační strategie specifické pro univerzitu.

Jiný: Vysoce intenzivní implementační strategie (HIS) pro členy implementačního týmu

• Pasivní přístup k webovým vzdělávacím materiálům
• Osobní technické školení o implementaci GlobalConsent v celém areálu; diskuse a demonstrace programu GlobalConsent; standardizovaný implementační manuál
• Osobní školení vedoucích k prosazení GlobalConsent s interními zainteresovanými stranami (vedoucí, implementační týmy, učitelé, studenti); styly vedení; řízení týmů; vliv bez autority; zvládání konfliktů; emoční inteligence; jednání; vedoucí změnu
• Dvakrát týdně (šest) jednohodinových nahraných webinářů týmu pro zlepšování kvality, které poskytují opakovací školení; hodnotit pokrok v implementaci; posoudit úpravy; vybudovat peer-síť; poskytnout k diskusi anonymizované údaje o postupu implementace

Ostatní jména:

• Členové jeho realizačního týmu

Jiný: Členové implementačního týmu strategií nízké intenzity (LIS).

• Pasivní přístup k webovým vzdělávacím materiálům
• Osobní technické školení o implementaci GlobalConsent v celém areálu; diskuse a demonstrace programu GlobalConsent; standardizovaný implementační manuál

Ostatní jména:

• Členové implementačního týmu LIS

Students' Reported Prosocial Bystander Behavior

Students will be asked if they had engaged in any of seven prosocial bystander behaviors in the past 3 months (or since the last time completing the questionnaire). Items are scored as 0 = never performed, 1 = performed once, 2 = performed more than once. The numbers of participants who report engaging in at least one of seven prosocial bystander behaviors at least once are presented here.

Students' reported Sexually Violent Behavior

The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) is an assessment tool used to measure the prevalence of sexual aggression. It is designed to measure the frequency and severity of sexual aggression acts committed by an individual. The SES is a self-report questionnaire developed by researchers at the University of Michigan. The Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization is a multi-item measure to assess unwanted sexual victimization. Surveys will be provided every six months for up to 30 months.

Posouzení a rozvrh invalidity

Pouze studenti: Posouzení zdravotního postižení bude posuzováno za použití Plánu hodnocení zdravotního postižení 2.0 Světové zdravotnické organizace (WHODAS 2.0), což je obecný nástroj pro hodnocení zdraví a postižení používaný u všech nemocí, včetně duševních, neurologických a návykových poruch, použitelný v obou zemích. klinické a obecné populační nastavení. Je to nástroj pro měření úrovně postižení a fungování v šesti doménách. Odpovědi hodnotí každou otázku na škále od 0 (žádná) do 4 (extrémní nebo nelze).

Existují tři metody hodnocení: jednoduché skóre, komplexní skóre nebo průměrné skóre. Jednoduché skóre je součtem hodnocení každé otázky. Komplexní skóre je součet hodnocení vynásobený váhovým faktorem. Průměrné skóre je průměr hodnocení pro každou doménu.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Measure

Pouze pro studenty: DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cuting Symptom Measure-Adult je nástroj navržený k posouzení oblastí duševního zdraví, které jsou důležité pro různé psychiatrické diagnózy. Skládá se z 23 otázek, které hodnotí 13 psychiatrických domén, jako je deprese, úzkost, somatické symptomy a další. Každá položka v měření je hodnocena na 5bodové stupnici (0=žádná nebo vůbec ne; 1=mírná nebo vzácná, méně než jeden den nebo dva; 2=mírná nebo několik dní; 3=střední nebo více než polovina dny a 4 = těžké nebo téměř každý den). Mírné (tj. 2) nebo vyšší hodnocení jakékoli položky v rámci domény může vést k dalšímu dotazování a následné kontrole, aby se zjistilo, zda je pro danou doménu nutné podrobnější posouzení. Konzistentně vysoké skóre v konkrétní doméně může u jednotlivce znamenat významné a problematické symptomy, které by mohly vyžadovat další posouzení, léčbu a sledování.

Znalost/účinky alkoholu na poznání alkoholu na poznání

Pouze studenti: Tento formulář žádá dohodu nebo nesouhlas respondentů o 5 otázkách souvisejících s alkoholem zaměřené na rozhodování, chování a sexuální násilí. Hodnotí dohodu nebo neshodu pomocí 5-bodového Likertova od „naprosto nesouhlasu“ až po „naprosto souhlasí“.

Perceptions of Sexual Violence form at their respective university

Perceptions of sexual violence will be assessed by respondents' rating their level of agreement with 3 statements regarding the frequency and impact of sexual violence at their university using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Implementation Team Scale for staff and supervisors

Leadership in implementation teams is assessed using two scales, one for implementation team supervisors, and one for implementation team staff. Each scale has 13 items and uses a 5-point Likert ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree" to assess respondent's agreement on statements about their team supervisor (for staff) or themselves (for supervisors).

Cultural Exchange Inventory

For implementation team members only: The Cultural Exchange Inventory assesses the teamwork landscape of GlobalConsent implementation teams using 7 items. Respondents give their level of agreement, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree," on statements such as "The implementation team is working well together to implement GlobalConsent" and "My colleagues are devoting a lot of time and energy to maintain the collaboration of the implementation team.

College Date Rape Attitudes & Behaviors Scale

For implementation team members only: The College Date Rape Attitude Survey (CDRAS), a measure intended to assess attitudes related to the risk of committing rape in adolescents and young adults, the CDRAS measures four rape-related attitudes: Entitlement, Blame Shifting, Traditional Roles, and Overwhelming Sexual Arousal. The CDRAS contains 20 items measuring attitudes toward date rape. All items require responses on a 5-point Likert scale. The responses for the attitude scale are strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree. Scoring is reversed for appropriate items; so that high scores (5) always correspond to the most desirable (rape-related) responses.

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Programming to Prevent Sexually Violent Behavior among Students

This scale assesses respondents' attitudes towards sexual violence prevention programming by asking them to rate their level of agreement with 10 statements, such as "Implementing sexual violence prevention programming with students at our university is something I support," "...addresses a relevant problem among our students," "…would be easy for students to participate in." These statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of GlobalConsent

This scale assesses respondents' attitudes towards the GlobalConsent program specifically by asking them to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with 10 statements, such as "Implementing GlobalConsent with students at our university is something I support," "...addresses a relevant problem among our students," "…would be easy for students to participate in." these statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Sexual Violence Legality and Harm (Information about Sexual Activity)

Knowledge of the law is assessed with 12 items where respondents indicate if they think the situations described are illegal (scored as 1), legal, but harmful (2), or legal and not harmful (3), with example items including "Forcing a person to have oral sex" and "Pressuring someone to have sex." Items will be re-coded such that responses indicating an accurate estimate or overestimate of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as "1" and items indicating an underestimation of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as "0".

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Active Consent (Information about Sexual Consent)

This form adapted the Sexual Consent Scale to ask respondents to rate their level of agreement with 12 statements about sexual consent using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". It includes statements such as "If a person consents to sex, one can continue sexual contact even if the person changes their mind," and "Obtaining consent for sex is just as necessary in a long-term relationship as in a new relationship."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Rejection of Rape Myths (Attitudes about Sexual Situations)

This form is a combination of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale and the College Date Rape Attitudes & Behaviors Scale. This assesses attitudes towards sexual assault and rape by asking respondents to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with 15 statements using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". Statements include "If a woman dresses in a sexy dress, she is asking for sex," and "When guys rape, it is usually because of their strong desire for sex."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Perceptions of Campus Attitudes

This form assesses the perceptions of respondents in their university's faculty and leaders' potential response to sexual violence on their university campus. Questions ask about behaviors of abuse, sexual assault, and stalking, and their level of agreement or disagreement with whether faculty and leaders would believe a student reporting experiencing these behaviors, respect a student who reported experiencing these behaviors, or admire a student intervening in these behaviors. Agreement is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree"

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 34 months, and 49 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Empathy for Rape Victims

Students only: Empathy for rape victims will be assessed with a modified version of the Rape Empathy Scale (RES). This assessment includes 10 items where participants were asked to choose between two statements, one of which reflected greater empathy towards rapists ("I understand the helplessness a rapist might feel during a rape since he cannot control his actions") and one of which reflected greater empathy towards victims ("I understand the helplessness a victim might feel during a rape"). Responses are scored as 1 (more empathy for victim) or 0 (more empathy for perpetrator) and total scores range from 0 to 10 where higher scores indicate more empathy towards rape victims.

Sexual Communication Attitudes

Students only: This is a 7-item scale measuring agreement or disagreement with statements focusing on sexual communication. Agreement and disagreement is assessed using a 5-point Likert ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree."

Bystander Self-Efficacy

Students only: Bystander Self-Efficacy will be measured using the Bystander Efficacy Scale, which was developed for a project that evaluated the effectiveness of a sexual violence prevention program based on preventing antecedents to sexual violence by increasing prosocial bystander behavior. On this measure, participants are asked to indicate their confidence, on a 3-point scale, in performing each of 10 bystander behaviors (e.g., "Speak up to a guy who is making excuses for using physical force in a sexual relationship."). Scores are created by subtracting the mean of the 10 items from 100 to create a scale of perceived ineffectiveness; thus, higher scores indicate lesser effectiveness.

Bystander Intention to Intervene (Readiness to Intervene)

Students only: Readiness to Intervene will be measured using three intent-to-help subscales.

• Intent to Help Friend Scale: Sexual Abuse
• Intent to Help Friend Scale: Intimate Partner Violence Intent to help is an attitude that is related to bystander action. Participants will be asked how likely they are to take different bystander actions.

The second Intent to Help subscale focuses on participants' intent to help strangers in both sexual abuse and intimate partner abuse situations.

Responses range from 1 (not at all likely) to 5 (extremely likely). The average is calculated from the answers across the items to score this measure.

Severity Measure for Depression

Students only: Depression will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9): The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. The PHQ-9 is completed by the participant in minutes and is rapidly scored by a clinician. The PHQ-9 can also be administered repeatedly, which can reflect the improvement or the worsening of depression in response to treatment. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Students will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), which is a quick and easy tool to help identify patients with anxiety and monitor treatment response. The GAD-7 has been validated as a diagnostic tool and a severity assessment scale. The scale consists of 7 items. The total score can range from 0 to 21, and it indicates the severity of anxiety as follows:

0 to 4: Minimal anxiety 5 to 9: Mild anxiety 10 to 14: Moderate anxiety 15 to 21: Severe anxiety

Students' Proactive Bystander Behavior Scale

This scale asks respondents to indicate whether and how often they completed proactive bystander behavior actions in the last 6 months (the time between each survey wave). Behaviors include "I have encouraged others to learn more and get involved in preventing sexual or dating violence," and "I have told guys not to talk about women in sexually degrading ways," and response options for each statement are (0) No, I have not done this in the last 6 months, (1) Yes, once in the last 6 months, and (2) Yes, more than once in the last 6 months.

Students' Reactive Bystander Action Scale

This scale asks respondents whether and how often they completed reactive bystander behavior actions in the last 6 months (the time between each survey wave). Actions include "I have expressed concern or offered help to a woman who said she had an unwanted sexual experience but didn't call it 'rape'," "I have reported formally to an authority a guy who used physical force against a women," and "I have intervened with a guy's action because I wanted to stop an act of sexual violence." Responses options for each statement are (0) I experienced this situation in the last 6 months and did NOT act, (1) Yes, once in the last 6 months, (2) Yes, more than once in the last 6 months, and (9) I did NOT experience any situation like this in the last 6 months.