Strategier for implementering af globalt samtykke for at forhindre seksuel vold hos universitetsmænd (SCALE)

Eksperimentel: Studerende

Studerende i begge randomiseringsgrupper bliver aktive forbrugere af GlobalConsent med en e-mailintroduktion til programmet, proces, leveringsplan, dataindsamlingsprocedurer og samtykke.

Adfærdsmæssigt: Lav-intensitet implementeringsstrategier (LIS) for studerende

Studerende i LIS-gruppen vil modtage grundlæggende implementeringsstrategier af GlobalConsent, der ofte bruges til at levere online-programmer på amerikanske universiteter med påmindelser om færdiggørelse af e-mail/SMS med en forudbestemt frekvens i 12 uger.

Andre navne:

• LIS-Studerende

Adfærdsmæssigt: High-intensity implementation strategies (HIS)-Students

Students in the HIS group will receive educational outreach in a pre-implementation orientation to GlobalConsent, covering similar topics and three monthly one-hour learning sessions during implementation in which technical questions about program access or progression can be addressed; more intensive intervention to enhance adherence with more frequent email/Short Message Service (SMS), completion reminders; and demand generation encouraging program completion.

Andre navne:

• HANS-Elever

Eksperimentel: Fakultet

Fakultetet vil modtage adgang til undervisningsmateriale baseret på universitetets randomiseringsimplementeringsstrategigruppe.

Andet: Højintensive implementeringsstrategier (HIS) for fakultetet

• Passiv adgang til webbaseret undervisningsmateriale
• Rådhuse (3) med generelle fakulteter til at definere seksuel vold; rater hos unge; akutte/kroniske effekter i løbet af livsforløbet; primære forebyggelse evidensbaserede interventioner (EBI'er)

Andre navne:

• HANS-Fakultetet

Andet: Lav-intensitet implementeringsstrategier (LIS) for fakultetet

Passiv adgang til webbaseret undervisningsmateriale

Andre navne:

• LIS-Fakultet

Eksperimentel: Ledere

Ledere vil modtage stedspecifikke (universitet) invitationer og materiale baseret på implementeringsstrategigruppen.

Andet: Højintensive implementeringsstrategier (HIS) for ledere

• Stedspecifik invitation til at deltage
• Passiv adgang til webbaseret undervisningsmateriale
• Et pre-implementation webinar til at definere seksuel vold; rater blandt unge i Vietnam; akutte/kroniske effekter over livsforløbet; primære forebyggelse EBI'er; opsummering af projektbeskrivelse og samarbejde; del GlobalConsent-webstedet for passiv adgang til undervisningsmateriale
• Månedlige e-mails fra uddannede interne facilitatorer til universitetsledere med opdateringer om implementeringsfremskridt
• Et webinar efter implementering til at dele anonymiserede resultater (af IS-gruppe); diskutere plan for opretholdelse (herunder vejledning i, hvordan man håndterer indberetning af seksuel vold i eksisterende universitetsrådgivningscentre)

Andre navne:

• HIS-ledere

Andet: Lav-intensitet implementeringsstrategier (LIS) for ledere

• Stedspecifik invitation til at deltage
• Passiv adgang til webbaseret undervisningsmateriale
• Et pre-implementation webinar til at definere seksuel vold; rater blandt unge i Vietnam; akutte/kroniske effekter over livsforløbet; primære forebyggelse EBI'er; opsummering af projektbeskrivelse og samarbejde; del GlobalConsent-webstedet for passiv adgang til undervisningsmateriale

Andre navne:

• LIS-ledere

Eksperimentel: Medlemmer af implementeringsteam

Medlemmer af implementeringsteamet vil modtage passiv adgang til webbaseret materiale og træning i henhold til den universitetsspecifikke implementeringsstrategigruppe.

Andet: Højintensive implementeringsstrategier (HIS) for implementeringsteammedlemmer

• Passiv adgang til webbaseret undervisningsmateriale
• Personlig teknisk træning på campus-dækkende implementering af GlobalConsent; diskussion og demonstration af GlobalConsent-programmet; standardiseret implementeringsmanual
• Personlig lederuddannelse for at forkæmpe GlobalConsent med interne interessenter (ledere, implementeringsteams, fakultet, studerende); ledelsesstile; ledelse af teams; indflydelse uden autoritet; håndtering af konflikter; følelsesmæssig intelligens; forhandling; lede forandring
• Hver anden uge (seks) 1-times optagede kvalitetsforbedringsteamwebinarer for at give genopfriskningstræning; vurdere implementeringsfremskridt; vurdere ændringer; opbygge peer-netværk; give anonymiserede data om implementeringsfremskridt til diskussion

Andre navne:

• HIS-Implementeringsteammedlemmer

Andet: Lav-intensitet implementeringsstrategier (LIS) Implementeringsteammedlemmer

• Passiv adgang til webbaseret undervisningsmateriale
• Personlig teknisk træning på campus-dækkende implementering af GlobalConsent; diskussion og demonstration af GlobalConsent-programmet; standardiseret implementeringsmanual

Andre navne:

• Medlemmer af LIS Implementeringsteam

Students' Reported Prosocial Bystander Behavior

Students will be asked if they had engaged in any of seven prosocial bystander behaviors in the past 3 months (or since the last time completing the questionnaire). Items are scored as 0 = never performed, 1 = performed once, 2 = performed more than once. The numbers of participants who report engaging in at least one of seven prosocial bystander behaviors at least once are presented here.

Students' reported Sexually Violent Behavior

The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES) is an assessment tool used to measure the prevalence of sexual aggression. It is designed to measure the frequency and severity of sexual aggression acts committed by an individual. The SES is a self-report questionnaire developed by researchers at the University of Michigan. The Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization is a multi-item measure to assess unwanted sexual victimization. Surveys will be provided every six months for up to 30 months.

Handicapvurdering og tidsplan

Kun studerende: Handicapvurderingen vil blive vurderet ved at bruge World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), som er et generisk vurderingsinstrument for sundhed og handicap, der bruges på tværs af alle sygdomme, herunder psykiske, neurologiske og vanedannende lidelser, der gælder i både kliniske og generelle befolkningsindstillinger. Det er et værktøj til at måle niveauet af handicap og funktion på seks domæner. Svarene bedømmer hvert spørgsmål på en skala fra 0 (ingen) til 4 (ekstremt eller kan ikke).

Der er tre scoringsmetoder: simpel score, kompleks score eller gennemsnitlig score. Den simple score er summen af ​​vurderingerne for hvert spørgsmål. Den komplekse score er summen af ​​vurderingerne ganget med en vægtfaktor. Den gennemsnitlige score er gennemsnittet af vurderingerne for hvert domæne.

Diagnostisk og statistisk manual (DSM)-5 Måling af krydsskæringssymptom

Kun studerende: DSM-5 Self-Rated Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure-Adult er et værktøj designet til at vurdere mentale sundhedsdomæner, der er vigtige på tværs af forskellige psykiatriske diagnoser. Den består af 23 spørgsmål, der evaluerer 13 psykiatriske domæner, såsom depression, angst, somatiske symptomer og meget mere. Hvert punkt på målingen er vurderet på en 5-punkts skala (0=ingen eller slet ikke; 1=let eller sjælden, mindre end en dag eller to; 2=mild eller flere dage; 3=moderat eller mere end halvdelen af dage; og 4 = alvorlig eller næsten hver dag). En mild (dvs. 2) eller højere vurdering af ethvert element inden for et domæne kan vejlede yderligere forespørgsler og opfølgning for at afgøre, om en mere detaljeret vurdering for det pågældende domæne er nødvendig. Konsekvent høje scores på et bestemt domæne kan indikere signifikante og problematiske symptomer for individet, som kan berettige yderligere vurdering, behandling og opfølgning

Alkoholnedsættelse Viden/virkninger af alkohol på kognition

Kun studerende: Denne formular beder respondenternes aftale eller uenighed om 5 alkoholrelaterede spørgsmål med fokus på beslutningstagning, adfærd og seksuel vold. Den vurderer aftale eller uenighed ved hjælp af en 5-punkts Likert, der spænder fra "helt uenig" til "helt enig".

Perceptions of Sexual Violence form at their respective university

Perceptions of sexual violence will be assessed by respondents' rating their level of agreement with 3 statements regarding the frequency and impact of sexual violence at their university using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Implementation Team Scale for staff and supervisors

Leadership in implementation teams is assessed using two scales, one for implementation team supervisors, and one for implementation team staff. Each scale has 13 items and uses a 5-point Likert ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree" to assess respondent's agreement on statements about their team supervisor (for staff) or themselves (for supervisors).

Cultural Exchange Inventory

For implementation team members only: The Cultural Exchange Inventory assesses the teamwork landscape of GlobalConsent implementation teams using 7 items. Respondents give their level of agreement, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree," on statements such as "The implementation team is working well together to implement GlobalConsent" and "My colleagues are devoting a lot of time and energy to maintain the collaboration of the implementation team.

College Date Rape Attitudes & Behaviors Scale

For implementation team members only: The College Date Rape Attitude Survey (CDRAS), a measure intended to assess attitudes related to the risk of committing rape in adolescents and young adults, the CDRAS measures four rape-related attitudes: Entitlement, Blame Shifting, Traditional Roles, and Overwhelming Sexual Arousal. The CDRAS contains 20 items measuring attitudes toward date rape. All items require responses on a 5-point Likert scale. The responses for the attitude scale are strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree. Scoring is reversed for appropriate items; so that high scores (5) always correspond to the most desirable (rape-related) responses.

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Programming to Prevent Sexually Violent Behavior among Students

This scale assesses respondents' attitudes towards sexual violence prevention programming by asking them to rate their level of agreement with 10 statements, such as "Implementing sexual violence prevention programming with students at our university is something I support," "...addresses a relevant problem among our students," "…would be easy for students to participate in." These statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of GlobalConsent

This scale assesses respondents' attitudes towards the GlobalConsent program specifically by asking them to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with 10 statements, such as "Implementing GlobalConsent with students at our university is something I support," "...addresses a relevant problem among our students," "…would be easy for students to participate in." these statements will be rated using a 5-point Likert ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Sexual Violence Legality and Harm (Information about Sexual Activity)

Knowledge of the law is assessed with 12 items where respondents indicate if they think the situations described are illegal (scored as 1), legal, but harmful (2), or legal and not harmful (3), with example items including "Forcing a person to have oral sex" and "Pressuring someone to have sex." Items will be re-coded such that responses indicating an accurate estimate or overestimate of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as "1" and items indicating an underestimation of the illegality and harms of sexual violence were coded as "0".

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Active Consent (Information about Sexual Consent)

This form adapted the Sexual Consent Scale to ask respondents to rate their level of agreement with 12 statements about sexual consent using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". It includes statements such as "If a person consents to sex, one can continue sexual contact even if the person changes their mind," and "Obtaining consent for sex is just as necessary in a long-term relationship as in a new relationship."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Rejection of Rape Myths (Attitudes about Sexual Situations)

This form is a combination of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale and the College Date Rape Attitudes & Behaviors Scale. This assesses attitudes towards sexual assault and rape by asking respondents to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with 15 statements using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree". Statements include "If a woman dresses in a sexy dress, she is asking for sex," and "When guys rape, it is usually because of their strong desire for sex."

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months.
• Faculty: Baseline, 32 months, and 44 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Perceptions of Campus Attitudes

This form assesses the perceptions of respondents in their university's faculty and leaders' potential response to sexual violence on their university campus. Questions ask about behaviors of abuse, sexual assault, and stalking, and their level of agreement or disagreement with whether faculty and leaders would believe a student reporting experiencing these behaviors, respect a student who reported experiencing these behaviors, or admire a student intervening in these behaviors. Agreement is assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree"

Surveys will be provided to all groups at different time points as follows:

• Students: Baseline (month 10), every 6 months up to 30 months
• Faculty: Baseline, 34 months, and 49 months
• Leaders: Baseline and 41 months
• Implementation Team: Baseline, month 25, month 29, and month 32

Empathy for Rape Victims

Students only: Empathy for rape victims will be assessed with a modified version of the Rape Empathy Scale (RES). This assessment includes 10 items where participants were asked to choose between two statements, one of which reflected greater empathy towards rapists ("I understand the helplessness a rapist might feel during a rape since he cannot control his actions") and one of which reflected greater empathy towards victims ("I understand the helplessness a victim might feel during a rape"). Responses are scored as 1 (more empathy for victim) or 0 (more empathy for perpetrator) and total scores range from 0 to 10 where higher scores indicate more empathy towards rape victims.

Sexual Communication Attitudes

Students only: This is a 7-item scale measuring agreement or disagreement with statements focusing on sexual communication. Agreement and disagreement is assessed using a 5-point Likert ranging from "totally disagree" to "totally agree."

Bystander Self-Efficacy

Students only: Bystander Self-Efficacy will be measured using the Bystander Efficacy Scale, which was developed for a project that evaluated the effectiveness of a sexual violence prevention program based on preventing antecedents to sexual violence by increasing prosocial bystander behavior. On this measure, participants are asked to indicate their confidence, on a 3-point scale, in performing each of 10 bystander behaviors (e.g., "Speak up to a guy who is making excuses for using physical force in a sexual relationship."). Scores are created by subtracting the mean of the 10 items from 100 to create a scale of perceived ineffectiveness; thus, higher scores indicate lesser effectiveness.

Bystander Intention to Intervene (Readiness to Intervene)

Students only: Readiness to Intervene will be measured using three intent-to-help subscales.

• Intent to Help Friend Scale: Sexual Abuse
• Intent to Help Friend Scale: Intimate Partner Violence Intent to help is an attitude that is related to bystander action. Participants will be asked how likely they are to take different bystander actions.

The second Intent to Help subscale focuses on participants' intent to help strangers in both sexual abuse and intimate partner abuse situations.

Responses range from 1 (not at all likely) to 5 (extremely likely). The average is calculated from the answers across the items to score this measure.

Severity Measure for Depression

Students only: Depression will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9): The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring, and measuring the severity of depression. The PHQ-9 is completed by the participant in minutes and is rapidly scored by a clinician. The PHQ-9 can also be administered repeatedly, which can reflect the improvement or the worsening of depression in response to treatment. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Students will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), which is a quick and easy tool to help identify patients with anxiety and monitor treatment response. The GAD-7 has been validated as a diagnostic tool and a severity assessment scale. The scale consists of 7 items. The total score can range from 0 to 21, and it indicates the severity of anxiety as follows:

0 to 4: Minimal anxiety 5 to 9: Mild anxiety 10 to 14: Moderate anxiety 15 to 21: Severe anxiety

Students' Proactive Bystander Behavior Scale

This scale asks respondents to indicate whether and how often they completed proactive bystander behavior actions in the last 6 months (the time between each survey wave). Behaviors include "I have encouraged others to learn more and get involved in preventing sexual or dating violence," and "I have told guys not to talk about women in sexually degrading ways," and response options for each statement are (0) No, I have not done this in the last 6 months, (1) Yes, once in the last 6 months, and (2) Yes, more than once in the last 6 months.

Students' Reactive Bystander Action Scale

This scale asks respondents whether and how often they completed reactive bystander behavior actions in the last 6 months (the time between each survey wave). Actions include "I have expressed concern or offered help to a woman who said she had an unwanted sexual experience but didn't call it 'rape'," "I have reported formally to an authority a guy who used physical force against a women," and "I have intervened with a guy's action because I wanted to stop an act of sexual violence." Responses options for each statement are (0) I experienced this situation in the last 6 months and did NOT act, (1) Yes, once in the last 6 months, (2) Yes, more than once in the last 6 months, and (9) I did NOT experience any situation like this in the last 6 months.