一项比较非苏拉赞和埃索美拉唑在胃食管反流病患者中的研究
一项多中心、随机、开放标签研究,旨在评估胃食管反流病(GERD)患者使用非苏拉赞40毫克与埃索美拉唑40毫克后的症状缓解和安全性
本临床试验的目的是评估非苏拉赞40 mg缓解成人胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的有效性和安全性。 该研究还将非苏拉赞与埃索美拉唑40 mg(一种常用的GERD治疗药物)进行了比较。
本研究旨在回答的主要问题是:
- 非苏拉赞是否能减轻胃灼热和反酸等GERD症状?
- 与埃索美拉唑相比,非苏拉赞是否安全且耐受性良好?
研究人员比较了非苏拉赞与埃索美拉唑,以确定非苏拉赞是否提供类似的症状缓解和安全性。
研究参与者:
- 被随机分配接受每日一次的非苏拉赞40 mg或埃索美拉唑40 mg治疗
- 服用研究药物4周,如果症状未改善,治疗可延长至8周
- 按计划参加门诊评估
- 完成症状问卷和每日症状日记
- 在整个研究过程中监测副作用和总体安全性
研究概览
详细说明
这项多中心、随机、开放标签、活性对照的临床研究旨在评估钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)非苏拉赞40毫克与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)埃索美拉唑40毫克在成人胃食管反流病(GERD)患者中的疗效和安全性。
GERD是一种慢性疾病,其特征是与反流相关的症状,如烧心和反酸,这些症状可能严重影响生活质量。尽管PPIs被广泛用作一线治疗,但据报道存在一些局限性,包括起效延迟和对夜间症状控制不足。非苏拉赞是一种新型P-CAB,通过可逆性和钾竞争性抑制H⁺/K⁺-ATP酶来抑制胃酸分泌,并在先前的临床研究中显示出快速起效和持续的酸抑制作用。
符合条件的参与者以1:1的比例随机分配,接受每日一次口服非苏拉赞40毫克或埃索美拉唑40毫克的治疗。初始治疗期为4周。在初始治疗后未获得足够症状缓解的参与者有资格继续接受分配的治疗,额外4周,总治疗时间最长可达8周。
主要通过患者使用经过验证的问卷和每日症状日记报告的症状评估来评估疗效。安全性评估包括在整个研究期间和随访期间监测不良事件、生命体征、体格检查和实验室评估。
本研究根据《赫尔辛基宣言》、国际协调会议良好临床实践(ICH-GCP)以及适用的当地监管要求的原则进行。在进行任何与研究相关的程序之前,所有参与者均提供了书面知情同意书。
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 第三阶段
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
DKI Jakarta
-
Jakarta Pusat、DKI Jakarta、印度尼西亚、10340
- Menteng Mitra Afia Jakarta Hospital
-
Jakarta Pusat、DKI Jakarta、印度尼西亚、10510
- RS Islam Jakarta Cempaka Putih
-
-
West Java
-
Depok、West Java、印度尼西亚、16424
- RS Universitas Indonesia
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
接受健康志愿者
描述
纳入标准:
- 签署书面知情同意书时年龄为18至60岁的成年人
- 男性或女性参与者
- 有胃食管反流病(GERD)症状史,包括烧心和/或反酸
GERD症状需通过以下方式确认:
- GERD-Q评分大于7分,且
- 过去7天内烧心和/或反酸症状出现超过3天
- 能够理解研究流程并完成问卷及每日症状日记
- 愿意且能够提供书面知情同意
排除标准:
胃肠道疾病:
- 诊断为炎症性肠病(克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎)、原发性食管动力障碍或胰腺炎
- 有影响胃酸分泌的胃或食管手术史(阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术或良性息肉内镜下息肉切除术除外)
- 提示胃肠道恶性肿瘤的报警症状(如严重吞咽困难、吞咽痛、胃肠道出血、贫血、不明原因体重减轻),除非已排除恶性肿瘤
病史
- 有临床意义的肝脏、肾脏、内分泌、血液、肿瘤或泌尿系统疾病
- 过去5年内有恶性肿瘤史(非消化道恶性肿瘤完全治愈且≥5年无复发者除外)
- 有精神病、药物滥用或酒精滥用史
- 已知HIV感染、活动性乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎感染(HCV RNA阳性)
用药与治疗
入组前2周内使用过禁止的合并用药或研究期间需持续使用禁止药物,包括:
- 质子泵抑制剂、钾竞争性酸阻滞剂、H2受体拮抗剂或其他抑酸剂
- 某些精神类药物、抗胆碱能药物、解痉药、全身性类固醇或黏膜保护剂
- 研究药物给药前4周内使用过其他研究性产品
实验室检查结果
- 丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)或总胆红素≥正常值上限2倍
- 血清肌酐或血尿素氮≥正常值上限2倍
生殖状态
- 孕妇或哺乳期妇女
- 有生育能力的女性或男性参与者在研究期间不愿采取适当避孕措施
其他
- 已知对研究产品或对照药物过敏
- 研究者认为存在任何使参与者不适合参加研究的情况
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的:非苏拉赞 40 毫克
该组参与者接受口服钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)非苏拉赞40 mg,每日一次给药。初始治疗期为4周。初始治疗后症状缓解不充分的参与者继续接受非苏拉赞40 mg治疗额外4周,最长治疗持续时间为8周。根据研究方案,在整个研究期间监测治疗依从性和安全性。
|
Fexuprazan以每日一次、每次40 mg的剂量口服给药。
参与者接受为期4周的初始治疗。
在初始治疗期后未获得充分症状缓解的参与者继续接受fexuprazan治疗额外4周,最长治疗持续时间为8周。
其他名称:
|
|
有源比较器:埃索美拉唑 40 毫克
被分配至该组的参与者接受了埃索美拉唑40毫克(一种质子泵抑制剂)的治疗,每日口服一次。初始治疗期为4周。在初始治疗期后未获得充分症状缓解的参与者继续接受埃索美拉唑40毫克治疗额外4周,最长治疗持续时间为8周。在整个研究期间,根据方案对治疗依从性和安全性进行了监测。
|
埃索美拉唑以每日一次40毫克的口服剂量给药。
参与者在初始阶段接受为期4周的治疗。
在初始治疗期后未获得足够症状缓解的参与者继续接受埃索美拉唑治疗额外4周,最长治疗持续时间为8周。
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With Symptom Relief at Week 4 (GERD-Q Score <8)
大体时间:4 weeks
|
Symptom relief was assessed using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q).
The GERD-Q total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 18, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater severity and higher likelihood of GERD).
The primary outcome was defined as the proportion of participants with a GERD-Q total score <8 at Week 4, indicating adequate relief of GERD symptoms.
|
4 weeks
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants With Symptom Relief at Week 8 (GERD-Q Score <8)
大体时间:8 weeks
|
The proportion of participants who achieved symptom relief at Week 8, defined as a total score of less than 8 on the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q).
The GERD-Q total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 18, where higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater symptom severity).
This assessment applied only to participants who continued treatment beyond the initial 4-week period.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Time to Complete Symptom Response After First Dose
大体时间:From first dose until achievement of complete response, up to 8 weeks
|
Complete response was defined as the absence of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation symptoms for 7 consecutive days based on patient diaries.
Time to complete response was measured in days from the first dose to the first day of the 7-day symptom-free period.
Analysis included all subjects using time-to-event methods.
|
From first dose until achievement of complete response, up to 8 weeks
|
|
Number of Participants Without Major GERD Symptoms
大体时间:Up to 8 weeks
|
The number of participants without major GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) during predefined periods, including the first 7 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after initiation of treatment, as recorded in participant diaries.
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Percentage of Days Free of Major GERD Symptoms
大体时间:Up to 8 weeks
|
The percentage of days without heartburn and/or acid regurgitation per participant during the first 7 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after treatment initiation.
This includes daytime, nighttime, and combined daytime/nighttime periods based on participant diary entries, analyzed and reported as the mean percentage of symptom-free days
|
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in GERD-Q Total Score
大体时间:Baseline up to 8 weeks (Evaluated at 7 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks)
|
Change from baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q) total score.
The GERD-Q is a 6-item scale used to evaluate the frequency of GERD symptoms.
Total scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 18, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity (a worse outcome).
|
Baseline up to 8 weeks (Evaluated at 7 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks)
|
|
Change From Baseline in GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total Score
大体时间:Baseline to up to 8 weeks
|
Change from baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) total score.
The GERD-HRQL is a 10-item instrument used to assess the impact of symptoms on daily life.
Total scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 50, where higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life (a worse outcome).
|
Baseline to up to 8 weeks
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Relief From Chronic Cough
大体时间:Up to 8 weeks
|
The number of participants who experienced relief from chronic cough symptoms during predefined periods after initiation of study treatment, based on participant diary assessments. Note: The "Baseline" rows report the number of participants who indicated they experienced the symptom of chronic cough at baseline, while all post-baseline time points report the number of participants that experienced symptom relief. |
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Number of Participants With Relief of Throat Irritation Sensation
大体时间:Up to 8 weeks
|
The number of participants who experienced relief of throat irritation or foreign body sensation during predefined periods after initiation of study treatment, as recorded in participant diaries. Note: The "Baseline" rows report the number of participants who indicated they experienced the symptom at baseline, while all post-baseline time points report the number of participants that experienced symptom relief. |
Up to 8 weeks
|
|
Number of Participants Without Nocturnal GERD Symptoms
大体时间:Up to 8 weeks
|
The number of participants who were not awakened from sleep due to heartburn or acid regurgitation during predefined periods after initiation of study treatment, as recorded in participant diaries. Note: The "Baseline" rows report the number of participants who indicated they experienced the symptom at baseline, while all post-baseline time points report the number of participants that experienced symptom relief. |
Up to 8 weeks
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 学习椅:Ari Fahrial Syam, MD, PhD、RS Islam Jakarta Cempaka Putih
出版物和有用的链接
一般刊物
- Weijenborg PW, Cremonini F, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. PPI therapy is equally effective in well-defined non-erosive reflux disease and in reflux esophagitis: a meta-analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Aug;24(8):747-57, e350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01888.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
- Maret-Ouda J, Markar SR, Lagergren J. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2536-2547. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21360.
- Laine L, Sharma P, Mulford DJ, Hunt B, Leifke E, Smith N, Howden CW. Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of the Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Vonoprazan and the Proton Pump Inhibitor Lansoprazole in US Subjects. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;117(7):1158-1161. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001735. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
- Zhang D, Liu S, Li Z, Wang R. Global, regional and national burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1372-1384. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2074535.
- Yang AY, Yoo H, Shin W, Lee YS, Lee H, Kim SE, Kim A. Size-reduced fexuprazan 20 mg demonstrated the optimal bioavailability and bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;31(1):40-48. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e3. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
- Shin W, Yang AY, Park H, Lee H, Yoo H, Kim A. A Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Fexuprazan 10 mg: Demonstrating Bioequivalence with the Reference Formulation and Evaluating Steady State. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;16(8):1141. doi: 10.3390/ph16081141.
- Kim GH, Choi MG, Kim JI, Lee ST, Chun HJ, Lee KL, Choi SC, Jang JY, Lee YC, Kim JG, Kim KB, Shim KN, Sohn CI, Kim SK, Kim SG, Jang JS, Kim N, Jung HY, Park H, Huh KC, Lee KJ, Hong SJ, Baek S, Han JJ, Lee OY. Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan in Patients with Acute or Chronic Gastritis. Gut Liver. 2023 Nov 15;17(6):884-893. doi: 10.5009/gnl220457. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
- Kim SI, Lee YC, Cha W, Jung AR, Jang JY, Choi JS, Lee DK, Lee HH, Kwon MS, Lee YS, Eun YG. Efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):5873-5883. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08877-6. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
- Zhuang Q, Liao A, He Q, Liu C, Zheng C, Li X, Liu Y, Wang B, Liu S, Zhang Y, Lin R, Chen H, Deng M, Tang Y, He C, Dai W, Tang H, Gong L, Li L, Xu B, Yang C, Zhou B, Su D, Guo Q, Li B, Zhou Y, Wang X, Fei S, Wu H, Wei S, Peng Z, Wang J, Li Y, Wang H, Deng T, Ding S, Li F, Chen M, Xiao Y. The efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in treating erosive esophagitis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;39(4):658-666. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16471. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
- Kang N, Kang MG, Lee SE, Kang SY, Jo EJ, Lee JH, Kim SH, Bahn JW, Lee BJ, Song WJ. Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan Versus Esomeprazole for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Related Chronic Cough: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Exploratory Trial. Lung. 2025 Apr 29;203(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00408-025-00815-5.
- Won H, Kim E, Chae J, Lee H, Cho JY, Jang IJ, Chung JY, Kim MG, Lee S. Pharmacokinetic interactions between fexuprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in healthy males. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 May;17(5):e13798. doi: 10.1111/cts.13798.
- Oh J, Yang E, Jang IJ, Lee H, Yoo H, Chung JY, Lee S, Oh J. Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions between Fexuprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Inhibitor, and Aspirin, in Healthy Subjects. Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 7;15(2):549. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020549.
- Hwang JG, Jeon I, Park SA, Lee A, Yu KS, Jang IJ, Lee S. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012 (fexuprazan) in healthy subjects with different ethnicities. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Dec;52(11-12):1648-1657. doi: 10.1111/apt.16131. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
- Sunwoo J, Oh J, Moon SJ, Ji SC, Lee SH, Yu KS, Kim HS, Lee A, Jang IJ. Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jul;48(2):206-218. doi: 10.1111/apt.14818. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
- Lee SP, Sung IK, Lee OY, Choi MG, Huh KC, Jang JY, Chun HJ, Kwon JG, Kim GH, Kim N, Rhee PL, Kim SG, Jung HY, Lee JS, Lee YC, Jung HK, Kim JG, Kim SK, Sohn CI. Randomized Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan According to the Timing of Dosing in Patients With Erosive Esophagitis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jan 31;31(1):86-94. doi: 10.5056/jnm24032. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
- Hafiz RA, Wong C, Paynter S, David M, Peeters G. The Risk of Community-Acquired Enteric Infection in Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Jul;52(7):613-622. doi: 10.1177/1060028018760569. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
- Strand DS, Kim D, Peura DA. 25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review. Gut Liver. 2017 Jan 15;11(1):27-37. doi: 10.5009/gnl15502.
- Rettura F, Bronzini F, Campigotto M, Lambiase C, Pancetti A, Berti G, Marchi S, de Bortoli N, Zerbib F, Savarino E, Bellini M. Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Management Update. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 1;8:765061. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765061. eCollection 2021.
- Kim SE, Kim N, Oh S, Kim HM, Park MI, Lee DH, Jung HC. Predictive factors of response to proton pump inhibitors in korean patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jan 1;21(1):69-77. doi: 10.5056/jnm14078.
- Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP, Pandolfino JE; CGIT GERD Consensus Conference Participants. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):984-994.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.025. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
- ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Desai M, Ruan W, Thosani NC, Amaris M, Scott JS, Saeed A, Abu Dayyeh B, Canto MI, Abidi W, Alipour O, Amateau SK, Cosgrove N, Elhanafi SE, Forbes N, Kohli DR, Kwon RS, Fujii-Lau LL, Machicado JD, Marya NB, Ngamruengphong S, Pawa S, Sheth SG, Thiruvengadam NR, Qumseya BJ; ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Feb;101(2):267-284. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
- Shaqran TM, Ismaeel MM, Alnuaman AA, Al Ahmad FA, Albalawi GA, Almubarak JN, AlHarbi RS, Alaqidi RS, AlAli YA, Alfawaz KS, Daghriri AA. Epidemiology, Causes, and Management of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 Oct 21;15(10):e47420. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47420. eCollection 2023 Oct.
- Nirwan JS, Hasan SS, Babar ZU, Conway BR, Ghori MU. Global Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD): Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 2;10(1):5814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62795-1.
- Lee KN, Lee OY, Chun HJ, Kim JI, Kim SK, Lee SW, Park KS, Lee KL, Choi SC, Jang JY, Kim GH, Sung IK, Park MI, Kwon JG, Kim N, Kim JJ, Lee ST, Kim HS, Kim KB, Lee YC, Choi MG, Lee JS, Jung HY, Lee KJ, Kim JH, Chung H. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 28;28(44):6294-6309. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6294.
- Eusebi LH, Ratnakumaran R, Yuan Y, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Bazzoli F, Ford AC. Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2018 Mar;67(3):430-440. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313589. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
- Hojo M, Nagahara A, Hahm KB, Iwakiri R, Watanabe T, Rani AA, Zhu Q, Chan FKL, Sollano JD, Kamiya T, Yamaguchi S, Motoya S, Fock KM, Fukudo S, Kachintorn U, Suzuki H, Murakami K; The International Gastroenterology Consensus Symposium Study Group. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Asian Countries: Results of a Questionnaire Survey. Digestion. 2020;101(1):66-79. doi: 10.1159/000504749. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- DW_DWP1401262001
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
IPD 计划说明
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.