ACS后接受复杂PCI治疗的HBR患者DAPT策略：患者决策辅助工具第二阶段Beta测试 (BETA-DAPT)
急性冠脉综合征后接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高出血风险患者的双联抗血小板治疗策略：患者决策辅助工具第二阶段测试
Among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent implantation, 17.5% are both at high bleeding risk (HBR) and have undergone complex PCI, which also places them at high thrombotic risk. In this population, several dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies may be considered: (1) de-escalation of DAPT intensity after 1 to 3 months (switch from ticagrelor/prasugrel to clopidogrel), (2) shortening DAPT duration to 1 to 3 months followed by antiplatelet monotherapy, (3) 12-month clopidogrel-based DAPT, and (4) 12-month ticagrelor/prasugrel-based DAPT. Selecting the most appropriate DAPT strategy in this dual-risk context is complex, and clinical trial evidence is limited for this specific subgroup. In the absence of clear guideline recommendations to support decision-making for patients facing both elevated bleeding and thrombotic risks, structured shared decision-making support is needed.
In this context, within research project 2025-3499 conducted with pharmacy residents, we developed a patient decision aid (PDA) designed to support shared decision-making by helping patients understand their risks, available options, and potential consequences, so they can express their preferences regarding antiplatelet therapy. The PDA aims to facilitate shared decisions by improving patients' understanding of benefits and harms and aligning choices with patient values. A preliminary version of the tool has already undergone alpha testing with a small group of internal users (physicians, pharmacists, and patient partners). The next step is beta testing, that is, real-world testing with the target population and clinicians to evaluate usability and acceptability in routine practice.
研究概览
地位
条件
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal、Quebec、加拿大、H1T 1C8
- Montreal Heart Institute
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria (Patients)
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Hospitalized on the coronary care unit ward at the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI)
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the current episode of care, treated with PCI and placement of one or more coronary stents
- High bleeding risk based on PRECISE-HBR score and high thrombotic risk, with both risks considered of comparable clinical importance by the treating medical team
Inclusion Criteria (Clinicians)
- Clinicians working in the MHI coronary care unit (cardiologists, medical residents, nurse practitioners, or pharmacists) who use the patient decision aid with one or more study participants
Exclusion Criteria (Patients)
- Receiving therapeutic anticoagulation
- Planned cardiac surgery during the same episode of care
- Prior history of coronary stent thrombosis
- Antiphospholipid syndrome or known thrombophilia
- Unable to participate in shared decision-making
- Unable to understand spoken and written French or English
- Concurrent participation in another study (followed within another research protocol)
- Transferred from another center for reasons other than coronary angiography at MHI and expected to return to the referring center for ongoing care (i.e., "fly-in/fly-out" patients)
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：不适用
- 介入模型：单组作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
其他：High bleeding risk patients treated with complex PCI in the context of ACS
The intervention is the use of the Patient Decision Aid (PDA) to support shared decision-making between patients and clinicians after PCI, assessed using questionnaires capturing multiple dimensions of decision quality. No pharmacologic treatment is administered as part of the study; exposure consists solely of complete use of the PDA according to the protocol. The study includes a single pre-post group, no interim analyses are planned given the limited project duration, and a single beta-testing phase will be conducted. |
Patient decision aid to support shared decision-making between patients and clinicians by helping patients understand their risks, available options, and potential consequences, so they can express their preferences regarding antiplatelet therapy. |
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Decisional Conflict (DCS-LL) After Use of the Patient Decision Aid (PDA)
大体时间：Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
Change in total score on the low-literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS-LL; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute), comparing pre-PDA vs post-PDA completion. Lower scores indicate less decisional conflict. |
Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Antiplatelet Strategy Knowledge Score After PDA Use
大体时间：Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
Change in total score on an adapted OHRI knowledge questionnaire assessing understanding of bleeding and thrombotic risks and DAPT options, comparing pre-PDA vs post-PDA completion. |
Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
|
Preparation for Decision-Making (PrepDM) Score After PDA Use
大体时间：Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
Total score on the Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM; OHRI) questionnaire completed after PDA use. Higher scores indicate greater perceived preparedness to make a decision with the clinician. |
Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
|
Patient Acceptability Score of the PDA in Routine Clinical Use
大体时间：Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
Total score on an OHRI acceptability questionnaire completed after PDA use, reflecting perceived relevance, clarity, length, and overall acceptability in the clinical setting. |
Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
|
Patient Refusal Rate to Use the PDA and Reasons for Refusal
大体时间：Pre-intervention (at the time of the consent request, prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).
|
Number and proportion of eligible patients who personally refuse participation/PDA use, and categorization of documented reasons for refusal (e.g., not interested, too tired, overwhelmed, language barriers, time constraints). |
Pre-intervention (at the time of the consent request, prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).
|
|
Agreement Between Patient-Preferred Antiplatelet Strategy and Strategy Prescribed at Hospital Discharge
大体时间：At hospital discharge (index hospitalization), comparing the patient preference recorded immediately after PDA completion with the antiplatelet strategy on the discharge prescription/orders (also post-PDA completion).
|
Proportion of agreement between (a) the antiplatelet strategy preferred by the patient as identified through the PDA and (b) the antiplatelet strategy documented on the discharge prescription/orders. |
At hospital discharge (index hospitalization), comparing the patient preference recorded immediately after PDA completion with the antiplatelet strategy on the discharge prescription/orders (also post-PDA completion).
|
|
Clinician Usability of the PDA (French System Usability Scale, F-SUS)
大体时间：Day 0 (immediately after PDA use with an included patient)
|
Total score on the French System Usability Scale (F-SUS) completed by clinicians after using the PDA with an included patient in routine clinical care. Higher scores indicate better usability. |
Day 0 (immediately after PDA use with an included patient)
|
|
Clinician Refusal Rate to Use the PDA and Reasons for Non-Use
大体时间：Pre-intervention (at the time the clinician is asked whether it is appropriate to approach the patient and offer the PDA, prior to patient approach and prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).
|
Number and proportion of eligible patient encounters in which the clinician declines to use the PDA when asked, along with categorization of documented reasons (e.g., time constraints, clinical instability, workflow barriers, clinician preference). |
Pre-intervention (at the time the clinician is asked whether it is appropriate to approach the patient and offer the PDA, prior to patient approach and prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Exploratory Subgroup Effects on Decisional Conflict Scores Low Litteracy (DCS-LL) Questionnaire
大体时间：Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
Exploratory assessment of whether changes in DCS-LL differ by prespecified characteristics: age (<70 vs ≥70 years), sex (male vs female), mother tongue (French vs English), education level (university vs lower) and prior percutaneous intervention with stent (yes or no). Analyses are descriptive/exploratory. |
Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.