Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Stratégie de DAPT chez les patients HBR subissant une ICP complexe après un SCA : Phase de test bêta de deuxième niveau d'une aide à la décision pour patients (BETA-DAPT)

8 novembre 2026 mis à jour par: Julien Quang Le Van, Montreal Heart Institute

Stratégie de bithérapie antiplaquettaire chez les patients à haut risque hémorragique subissant une intervention coronarienne percutanée complexe après un syndrome coronarien aigu : Phase bêta de deuxième niveau d'un outil d'aide à la décision pour les patients

Among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent implantation, 17.5% are both at high bleeding risk (HBR) and have undergone complex PCI, which also places them at high thrombotic risk. In this population, several dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies may be considered: (1) de-escalation of DAPT intensity after 1 to 3 months (switch from ticagrelor/prasugrel to clopidogrel), (2) shortening DAPT duration to 1 to 3 months followed by antiplatelet monotherapy, (3) 12-month clopidogrel-based DAPT, and (4) 12-month ticagrelor/prasugrel-based DAPT. Selecting the most appropriate DAPT strategy in this dual-risk context is complex, and clinical trial evidence is limited for this specific subgroup. In the absence of clear guideline recommendations to support decision-making for patients facing both elevated bleeding and thrombotic risks, structured shared decision-making support is needed.

In this context, within research project 2025-3499 conducted with pharmacy residents, we developed a patient decision aid (PDA) designed to support shared decision-making by helping patients understand their risks, available options, and potential consequences, so they can express their preferences regarding antiplatelet therapy. The PDA aims to facilitate shared decisions by improving patients' understanding of benefits and harms and aligning choices with patient values. A preliminary version of the tool has already undergone alpha testing with a small group of internal users (physicians, pharmacists, and patient partners). The next step is beta testing, that is, real-world testing with the target population and clinicians to evaluate usability and acceptability in routine practice.

Aperçu de l'étude

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

10

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
        • Montreal Heart Institute

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria (Patients)

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Hospitalized on the coronary care unit ward at the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI)
  • Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the current episode of care, treated with PCI and placement of one or more coronary stents
  • High bleeding risk based on PRECISE-HBR score and high thrombotic risk, with both risks considered of comparable clinical importance by the treating medical team

Inclusion Criteria (Clinicians)

- Clinicians working in the MHI coronary care unit (cardiologists, medical residents, nurse practitioners, or pharmacists) who use the patient decision aid with one or more study participants

Exclusion Criteria (Patients)

  • Receiving therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Planned cardiac surgery during the same episode of care
  • Prior history of coronary stent thrombosis
  • Antiphospholipid syndrome or known thrombophilia
  • Unable to participate in shared decision-making
  • Unable to understand spoken and written French or English
  • Concurrent participation in another study (followed within another research protocol)
  • Transferred from another center for reasons other than coronary angiography at MHI and expected to return to the referring center for ongoing care (i.e., "fly-in/fly-out" patients)

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: High bleeding risk patients treated with complex PCI in the context of ACS

The intervention is the use of the Patient Decision Aid (PDA) to support shared decision-making between patients and clinicians after PCI, assessed using questionnaires capturing multiple dimensions of decision quality.

No pharmacologic treatment is administered as part of the study; exposure consists solely of complete use of the PDA according to the protocol.

The study includes a single pre-post group, no interim analyses are planned given the limited project duration, and a single beta-testing phase will be conducted.

Patient decision aid to support shared decision-making between patients and clinicians by helping patients understand their risks, available options, and potential consequences, so they can express their preferences regarding antiplatelet therapy.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Decisional Conflict (DCS-LL) After Use of the Patient Decision Aid (PDA)
Délai: Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Change in total score on the low-literacy Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS-LL; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute), comparing pre-PDA vs post-PDA completion. Lower scores indicate less decisional conflict.

Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in Antiplatelet Strategy Knowledge Score After PDA Use
Délai: Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Change in total score on an adapted OHRI knowledge questionnaire assessing understanding of bleeding and thrombotic risks and DAPT options, comparing pre-PDA vs post-PDA completion.

Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
Preparation for Decision-Making (PrepDM) Score After PDA Use
Délai: Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Total score on the Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM; OHRI) questionnaire completed after PDA use. Higher scores indicate greater perceived preparedness to make a decision with the clinician.

Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
Patient Acceptability Score of the PDA in Routine Clinical Use
Délai: Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Total score on an OHRI acceptability questionnaire completed after PDA use, reflecting perceived relevance, clarity, length, and overall acceptability in the clinical setting.

Immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).
Patient Refusal Rate to Use the PDA and Reasons for Refusal
Délai: Pre-intervention (at the time of the consent request, prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).

Number and proportion of eligible patients who personally refuse participation/PDA use, and categorization of documented reasons for refusal (e.g., not interested, too tired, overwhelmed, language barriers, time constraints).

Pre-intervention (at the time of the consent request, prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).
Agreement Between Patient-Preferred Antiplatelet Strategy and Strategy Prescribed at Hospital Discharge
Délai: At hospital discharge (index hospitalization), comparing the patient preference recorded immediately after PDA completion with the antiplatelet strategy on the discharge prescription/orders (also post-PDA completion).

Proportion of agreement between (a) the antiplatelet strategy preferred by the patient as identified through the PDA and (b) the antiplatelet strategy documented on the discharge prescription/orders.

At hospital discharge (index hospitalization), comparing the patient preference recorded immediately after PDA completion with the antiplatelet strategy on the discharge prescription/orders (also post-PDA completion).
Clinician Usability of the PDA (French System Usability Scale, F-SUS)
Délai: Day 0 (immediately after PDA use with an included patient)

Total score on the French System Usability Scale (F-SUS) completed by clinicians after using the PDA with an included patient in routine clinical care. Higher scores indicate better usability.

Day 0 (immediately after PDA use with an included patient)
Clinician Refusal Rate to Use the PDA and Reasons for Non-Use
Délai: Pre-intervention (at the time the clinician is asked whether it is appropriate to approach the patient and offer the PDA, prior to patient approach and prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).

Number and proportion of eligible patient encounters in which the clinician declines to use the PDA when asked, along with categorization of documented reasons (e.g., time constraints, clinical instability, workflow barriers, clinician preference).

Pre-intervention (at the time the clinician is asked whether it is appropriate to approach the patient and offer the PDA, prior to patient approach and prior to PDA delivery, during the index hospitalization).

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Exploratory Subgroup Effects on Decisional Conflict Scores Low Litteracy (DCS-LL) Questionnaire
Délai: Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Exploratory assessment of whether changes in DCS-LL differ by prespecified characteristics: age (<70 vs ≥70 years), sex (male vs female), mother tongue (French vs English), education level (university vs lower) and prior percutaneous intervention with stent (yes or no). Analyses are descriptive/exploratory.

Baseline (pre-PDA, Day 0) and immediately post-PDA completion (Day 0, index hospitalization).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 février 2026

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

30 septembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

30 septembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

8 janvier 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 janvier 2026

Première publication (Réel)

5 février 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

12 novembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 novembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner