Study of Albumin-bound Paclitaxel (Abraxane) in Combination With Carboplatin and Herceptin in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

November 13, 2019 updated by: Celgene

A Phase II Study of Weekly Dose-Dense Nanoparticle Paclitaxel (ABI-007), Carboplatin With Herceptin® As First-Line Therapy of Advanced HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer

This trial will treat patients with advanced breast cancer with a new anti-cancer medicine used in combination with two existing anti-cancer medications: Albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007), Carboplatin and Herceptin. Participants will be given the combination therapy on a weekly basis and may continue on therapy as long as their condition improves and drug toxicity is tolerated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • Breastlink Med Group
    • Connecticut
      • Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06902
        • Hematology/Oncology P.C. Carl & Dorothy Bennet Cancer Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Washington Hospital Center
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 2007
        • Lombardi Cancer Center Georgetown University Hospital
    • Florida
      • Hudson, Florida, United States, 34667
        • Florida Cancer Institute
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33705
        • Gulf Coast Oncology Associates
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
        • Palm Beach Cancer Institute
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30341
        • Gerogia Cancer Specialist
    • Maine
      • Scarborough, Maine, United States, 04074
        • Maine Center for Cancer Medicine and Blood Disorders
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee Womens Hospital
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Southwest Regional Cancer Center
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Swedish Medical Center Cancer Institute Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast
  • Tumor shows 3+ overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)/proto-oncogene by immunohistochemistry assay, or is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)+
  • Stage IV disease
  • Measurable disease
  • At least 3 weeks since prior cytotoxic chemotherapy
  • At least 4 weeks since radiotherapy with full recovery
  • At least 4 weeks since major surgery with full recovery
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • At least 18 years old
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at least 1.5 x 10^9 cells/L
  • Platelets at least 100 x 10^9 cells/L
  • Hemoglobin at least 9 g/dL
  • Aspartame aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than 2.5X upper limit normal
  • Alkaline Phosphatase less than 1.5X upper limit normal
  • Creatinine less than 1.5 gm/dL
  • Normal left ventricular ejection fraction
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Agree to use method to avoid pregnancy
  • Informed Consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Up to one regimen of prior neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed. One year since Taxane and Herceptin treatment.
  • Cumulative life-time dose of doxorubicin is greater than 360 mg/m^2
  • Concurrent immunotherapy or hormonal therapy
  • Parenchymal brain metastases, if present, must be documented to be clinically and radiographically stable for at least 6 months after treatment
  • Serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness, including serious active infection
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • History of other malignancy within the last 5 years which could affect the diagnosis or assessment of breast cancer
  • Patients who have received an investigational drug within the previous 3 weeks
  • Patient is currently enrolled in another clinical study receiving investigational therapies
  • Pregnant or nursing women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Albumin-bound paclitaxel, Carboplatin + Herceptin
Participants received albumin-bound paclitaxel, 100 mg/m^2 weekly every 3 out of 4 weeks, carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) = 6 every 4 weeks and Herceptin weekly, 4 mg/kg the first week and 2 mg/kg on all subsequent weeks by intravenous (IV) infusion for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Participants could continue treatment with chemotherapy beyond 6 cycles at the discretion of the investigator, but Herceptin therapy was to continue to be administered weekly (2 mg/kg) until intercurrent illness, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal or administration of any non-protocol anti-cancer treatment.
Drug: Albumin-bound paclitaxel
Administered by intravenous infusion.
Other Names:
  • ABI-007
  • ABRAXANE®
Drug: Carboplatin
Carboplatin dose was calculated using a modified Calvert formula (creatinine clearance was substituted for GFR): Total dose (mg) = (target AUC) x (creatinine clearance + 25). Note: AUC = 6 was initially targeted, but could be decreased due to toxicity.
Other Names:
  • Paraplatin®
Drug: Herceptin®
Administered by IV infusion
Other Names:
  • Trastuzumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Objective Confirmed Complete or Partial Overall Response
Time Frame: Objective response was evaluated every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles (approximately 39 months)
Percentage of participants who achieved an objective confirmed complete or partial overall response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. A complete response (CR) is the disappearance of all known disease and no new sites or disease related symptoms confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. A partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters confirmed at least 4 weeks after initial documentation. PR is also recorded when all measurable disease has completely disappeared, but a non-measurable component (i.e., ascites) is still present but not progressing, or with the persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
Objective response was evaluated every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles (approximately 39 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With a Total Response
Time Frame: Evaluated every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles.
Total response was defined as the percentage of participants with stable disease (SD) for ≥ 16 weeks or complete or partial overall response. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease. Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since the treatment started; or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or the unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion.
Evaluated every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles.
Time to Disease Progression
Time Frame: Assessed every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles.
Time to disease progression was measured from the date of first dose of study drug to the start of disease progression. Patients who did not have disease progression at the end of follow-up were censored at the last known time that the patient was evaluated for progression. Progression is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since the treatment started; or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or the unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion. Time to disease progression was summarized using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Assessed every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles.
Duration of Response
Time Frame: Assessed every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles.
Duration of response was evaluated by measuring progression-free survival for participants with a complete response or partial response. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the start of progression or patient death (whichever occurred first). Participants who did not have progression or were still alive were censored at the last known time the patient was progression free. Patients that initiated other anticancer therapy prior to progression were censored at the time when new anticancer therapy was initiated. Progression is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters recorded since the treatment started; or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or the unequivocal progression of a non-target lesion.
Assessed every 2 cycles, up to a maximum of 39 cycles.
Overall Patient Survival
Time Frame: From Day 1 until approximately 44 months.
Overall survival was defined as the time from the day of randomization to patient death (due to any cause), as assessed by post study follow-up on a monthly basis for 3 months and every 3 months. Participants still alive were censored at the last known time that the patient was alive. Patient survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
From Day 1 until approximately 44 months.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 up to 39 cycles
A Treatment-emergent AE was any AE that began or worsened after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or end of study whichever is later. A treatment related toxicity was one considered by the investigator to be possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug. AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE) on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above
Day 1 up to 39 cycles

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Celgene

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Seidman, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 4, 2004

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 4, 2004

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 5, 2004

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CA016

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings