Safety Study of a Vaccine Against Meningitis in Infants ( 2,4 & 6 Months Age) After a Birth Dose of Hepatitis B.

August 13, 2018 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

Assess Reactogenicity and Safety of GSK Biologicals' Tritanrix™-HepB/Hib-MenAC Compared to Tritanrix™-HepB/Hiberix™ (Control) in Healthy Infants (2,4,6 Months Age), After a Hepatitis B Birth Dose

The purpose of this study is to compare the reactogenicity & safety of Tritanrix™-HepB/Hib-MenAC vaccine to the international standard of care, Tritanrix™-HepB/Hiberix™.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Randomized study with four groups to receive one of the following vaccination regimens after a dose of hepatitis B vaccine given at birth:

- One of the 3 lots of GSK Biologicals' Hib-MenAC mixed with GSK Biologicals' Tritanrix™-HepB (3 different groups) - GSK Biologicals' Tritanrix™-HepB/Hiberix™

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Philippines
      • Muntinlupa, Philippines, 1781
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 3 days (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria at study entry:

  • Healthy infants aged less than or equal to 3 days of age, written informed consent obtained from the parents, born after a gestation period of 36 to 42 weeks.

Exclusion criteria at study entry:

  • Any confirmed immunodeficient condition, based on medical history & physical examination.
  • A family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  • Major congenital defects or serious chronic illness.
  • History of any neurologic disorders or seizures.
  • Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products since birth or planned administration during the study period.
  • Acute disease at the time of enrolment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Hib-MenAC Lot 1 Group
Healthy male or female subjects aged 56 to 83 days of age at the time of the first study vaccine dose, with previous hepatitis B vaccine at birth, received Tritanrix-HepB combined vaccine mixed extemporaneously with Meningitec conjugate vaccine Lot 1 at 2, 4 and 6 months of age as an intramuscular injections in the anterolateral part of the left thigh.
Biological: Tritanrix-HepB/Meningitec conjugate vaccine
The full content of two monodose vials of Tritanrix-HepB vaccine vial was extracted and injected into the vial containing the lyophilized Meningitec (5/5/5) vaccine. The vial was agitated until the lyophilized vaccine pellet had completely dissolved. The reconstituted mixed vaccines were used promptly after reconstitution (within 30 minutes): one dose of 0.5 ml of the reconstituted Tritanrix- HepB/Meningitec vaccine was withdrawn from the vial and administered, the needle was changed before injection
Other Names:
  • DTPw-HBV/Hib-MenAc conjugate vaccine
EXPERIMENTAL: Hib-MenAC Lot 2 Group
Healthy male or female subjects aged 56 to 83 days of age at the time of the first study vaccine dose, with previous hepatitis B vaccine at birth, received Tritanrix-HepB combined vaccine mixed extemporaneously with Meningitec conjugate vaccine Lot 2 at 2, 4 and 6 months of age as an intramuscular injections in the anterolateral part of the left thigh.
Biological: Tritanrix-HepB/Meningitec conjugate vaccine
The full content of two monodose vials of Tritanrix-HepB vaccine vial was extracted and injected into the vial containing the lyophilized Meningitec (5/5/5) vaccine. The vial was agitated until the lyophilized vaccine pellet had completely dissolved. The reconstituted mixed vaccines were used promptly after reconstitution (within 30 minutes): one dose of 0.5 ml of the reconstituted Tritanrix- HepB/Meningitec vaccine was withdrawn from the vial and administered, the needle was changed before injection
Other Names:
  • DTPw-HBV/Hib-MenAc conjugate vaccine
EXPERIMENTAL: Hib-MenAC Lot 3 Group
Healthy male or female subjects aged 56 to 83 days of age at the time of the first study vaccine dose, with previous hepatitis B vaccine at birth, received Tritanrix-HepB combined vaccine mixed extemporaneously with Meningitec conjugate vaccine Lot 3 at 2, 4 and 6 months of age as an intramuscular injections in the anterolateral part of the left thigh.
Biological: Tritanrix-HepB/Meningitec conjugate vaccine
The full content of two monodose vials of Tritanrix-HepB vaccine vial was extracted and injected into the vial containing the lyophilized Meningitec (5/5/5) vaccine. The vial was agitated until the lyophilized vaccine pellet had completely dissolved. The reconstituted mixed vaccines were used promptly after reconstitution (within 30 minutes): one dose of 0.5 ml of the reconstituted Tritanrix- HepB/Meningitec vaccine was withdrawn from the vial and administered, the needle was changed before injection
Other Names:
  • DTPw-HBV/Hib-MenAc conjugate vaccine
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hiberix Group
Healthy male or female subjects aged 56 to 83 days of age at the time of the first study vaccine dose, with previous hepatitis B vaccine at birth, received Tritanrix-HepB vaccine mixed extemporaneously with conjugate vaccine Hiberix at 2, 4 and 6 months of age as intramuscular injection in the anterolateral part of the thigh.
Biological: Tritanrix/Hiberix vaccine
The full content of the Tritanrix-HepB vaccine vial was extracted and injected into the vial containing the lyophilized Hiberix vaccine. The vial was agitated until the lyophilized vaccine pellet had completely dissolved. The reconstituted mixed vaccines were used promptly after reconstitution (within 30 minutes): the full volume of the mixed vaccines was withdrawn from the vial, the needle was changed before injection.
Other Names:
  • DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Occurrence of fever > 38.5°C(axillary) during the 4-day follow-up period after dose 1
Time Frame: Days 0-3 post dose 1
Days 0-3 post dose 1
Occurrence of fever > 38.5°C(axillary) during the 4-day follow-up period after dose 2
Time Frame: Days 0-3 post dose 2
Days 0-3 post dose 2
Occurrence of fever > 38.5°C(axillary) during the 4-day follow-up period after dose 3
Time Frame: Days 0-3 post dose 3
Days 0-3 post dose 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Occurrence of solicited symptoms other than fever >38.5°C (axillary) during the 4-day follow-up period after each dose
Time Frame: Days 0-3 after each dose
Days 0-3 after each dose
Occurrence of unsolicited symptoms during the 31-day follow-up period after each dose
Time Frame: Day 0-30 after each dose
Day 0-30 after each dose
Occurrence of serious adverse events during the entire study period
Time Frame: Day 0 up to Month 5
Day 0 up to Month 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 11, 2003

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 23, 2004

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 23, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 15, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 20, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 24, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 13, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 759346/004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings