Detrol Long Acting (LA) vs Estrace Vaginal Cream for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Symptoms (DRIVE)

October 1, 2018 updated by: David Rich Ellington, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Randomized Controlled Trial of Tolterodine in Combination With or Without Low-Dose Intravaginal Estradiol Cream for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Post-Menopausal Women

The purpose of this study is to determine if long acting tolterodine confers more benefit than intravaginal low dose estrogen in the treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome at 12 weeks post-treatment initiation. The hypothesis is that low dose intra-vaginal estrogen confers greater benefit than tolterodine in the treatment of Overactive Bladder symptoms. Secondary outcomes were to assess if the addition of the other therapy to the treatment regimen conferred benefit at 24 weeks and 52 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lower urinary tract bladder storage symptoms include urinary frequency, urinary urgency, nocturia and urge incontinence. Overactive Bladder (OAB)Syndrome is a condition in which urgency is the predominant symptom with or without urge incontinence and is usually accompanied by frequency and nocturia. The mainstay of treatment of women with OAB syndrome is treatment with anticholinergic medication as well as behavioral therapy. This method of treatment has demonstrated a 60% response rate as reported in the Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews.

In addition to anticholinergic therapy, vaginal atrophy is often corrected as part of a pharmacologic treatment plan. Vaginal atrophy is a condition this is vastly prevalent in post-menopausal women. It is thought to affect up to 48% of post-menopausal women. Many women with this condition experience vaginal dryness, irritation, painful intercourse, as well as urinary symptoms including dysuria, urgency, frequency, nocturia, incontinence and recurrent urinary tract infections.

Comparison: Tolterodine LA compared to low dose intra-vaginal estrogen cream for the treatment of OAB symptoms

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Irritative voiding symptoms to include sensory urgency, frequency, urge incontinence, nocturia
  • Postmenopausal women with a prior oophorectomy or 1 year from last menstrual period
  • Women age 40-90
  • Women with hysterectomy with preserved ovaries must be age 55 or greater or have a documented follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)>40 to ensure post-menopausal status
  • Community dwelling
  • Ambulatory
  • Ability to participate in a 12 month study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Post-void residual volume>150ml
  • Glaucoma without ophthalmologist clearance
  • Hormone replacement therapy in the past 6 months
  • Current anticholinergic treatment
  • Breast cancer
  • Impaired mental status
  • Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding in the past 12 months
  • Endometrial thickness on pelvic ultrasound >5mm
  • History of thromboembolic event
  • Gynecologic cancer
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (would be eligible after treatment)
  • Stage III pelvic organ prolapse or greater
  • Recent diuretic medication changes (one month from change)
  • Neurologic condition affecting bladder function (Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinsons, spinal cord injury, spina bifida)
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Prior pelvic irradiation
  • Interstitial cystitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Extended Release Tolterodine LA
An anti-muscarinic drug that is used for symptomatic treatment of urinary incontinence.
Drug: Extended Release Tolterodine LA
Tolterodine LA 4 mg once daily for 52 weeks. At 12 Weeks, the subjects were offered the addition of the alternative therapy with follow-up at 24 and 52 weeks
Other Names:
  • Detrol
Active Comparator: Intra Vaginal Estradiol Cream
For topical application to the vaginal area to treat symptoms of urgency or irritation with urination.
Drug: Intra Vaginal Estradiol Cream
17-B estradiol cream 0.5 grams nightly for 6 weeks then two times weekly for 46 weeks. At 12 Weeks, the subjects were offered the addition of the alternative therapy with follow-up at 24 and 52 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Estrace
  • Premarin vaginal cream

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms as Measured by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention
The first part of the OAB-q consists of eight questions assessing symptom bother with a possible score from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating greater symptom bother.
From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms as Measured by the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention
Assessment made using the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) portion of the OAB-q. The second part of the OAB-q, the HRQL consists of 25 questions that assesses HRQL which addresses coping, concern, sleep and social interaction where the scoring scale is from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.
From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention
Evaluate Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention

Assessment measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), patient perception of improvement. The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 being very much better to 7 being very much worse.

Frequencies of each response was reported. Each level achieved (movement towards 1), is considered an improvement.
From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention
This was measured using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). The PSQ consists of a single question, "How satisfied are you with your progress since your treatment" in which the 3 possible responses are "completely satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," and "not satisfied." The goal of treatment was to move all participants to "completely satisfied.
From baseline through 12 Weeks of Intervention
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms As Measured By the 3-Day Voiding Diary
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 weeks of Intervention
Number of voids and accidents/leakage per 3 day diary. A void is a voluntary and intentional event. An accident is involuntary and unintentional.
From baseline through 12 weeks of Intervention
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
The first part of the OAB-q consists of eight questions assessing symptom bother with a possible score from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating greater symptom bother.
Baseline to 24 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Assessment made using the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) portion of the OAB-q. The second part of the OAB-q, the HRQL consists of 25 questions that assesses HRQL which addresses coping, concern, sleep and social interaction where the scoring scale is from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.
Baseline to 24 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks
Assessment measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), patient perception of improvement. The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 being very much better to 7 being very much worse. Each level achieved(movement towards 1), is considered an improvement.
Baseline through 24 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms as Indicated by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ)
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks
As measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ). The PSQ consists of a single question, "How satisfied are you with your progress since your treatment" in which the 3 possible responses are "completely satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," and "not satisfied." The goal of treatment was to move all participants to "completely satisfied.
Baseline through 24 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline through 52 weeks
The first part of the OAB-q consists of eight questions assessing symptom bother with a possible score from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating greater symptom bother.
Baseline through 52 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline through 52 weeks
Assessment made using the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) portion of the OAB-q. The second part of the OAB-q, the HRQL consists of 25 questions that assesses HRQL which addresses coping, concern, sleep and social interaction where the scoring scale is from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.
Baseline through 52 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Symptoms as Indicated by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: Baseline through 52 weeks
Assessment measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), patient perception of improvement. The PGI-I is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1 being very much better to 7 being very much worse. Each level achieved(movement towards 1), is considered an improvement.
Baseline through 52 weeks
Subjective Patient Change in Irritative Urinary Symptoms as Indicated by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ)
Time Frame: Baseline through 52 Weeks
As measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ).The PSQ consists of a single question, "How satisfied are you with your progress since your treatment" in which the 3 possible responses are "completely satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," and "not satisfied." The goal of treatment was to move all participants to "completely satisfied.
Baseline through 52 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pfizer

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kimberly Gerten, M.D., Park Nicollette, St. Louis, Minnesota
  • Principal Investigator: Holly E. Richter, Ph.D., M.D., University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 23, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 25, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • F061208008
  • IIR - DRIVE

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Extended Release Tolterodine LA

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings