Investigation of the Safety and Feasibility of AAV1/SERCA2a Gene Transfer in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (SERCA-LVAD)

January 6, 2023 updated by: Imperial College London

Investigation of the Safety and Feasibility of AAV1/SERCA2a Gene Transfer in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and a Left Ventricular Assist Device

The aim of the study is to determine the safety and feasibility of giving an adeno-associated viral vector expressing the sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (SERCA2a), driven by the CMV promoter (AAV1-CMV-SERCA2a), to heart failure patients that have received a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for an accepted clinical indication.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

It is a randomised, double-blind study of 24 patients that will be randomised to receive either the study drug (AAV1.SERCA2a) or placebo.

The purpose of gene transfer of SERCA2a is to improve systolic and diastolic function of the failing ventricle. Studies show that reduction of SERCA2a in failing ventricle is a key factor in depression of contraction, and that restoration of SERCA2a levels can improve function to near normal levels. The vector will be delivered during a cardiac catheterisation procedure by a 10-minute infusion into the coronary arteries.

Myocardial tissue is obtained at the time of LVAD placement, as a routine part of device implantation. Further samples will be obtained when the heart is transplanted or the LVAD removed. Measures of tissue inflammation as well as efficacy of gene transfer will be made by comparing these two samples. Recovery of contractile function of the heart will be assessed during attempts to wean patients from the LVAD using standard protocols.

The results will be assessed in conjunction with two companion studies which will start earlier in the US, one performing SERCA2a gene transfer with the same vector, but delivered by direct injection into the myocardium during LVAD insertion, and one using AAV1-CMV-SERCA2a delivered percutaneously in heart failure patients. The latter has both a dose-ranging and placebo-controlled arm.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB23 3RE
        • Papworth Hospital
      • Middlesex, United Kingdom, UB9 6JH
        • Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefiled NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients that have had a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implanted for chronic heart failure, where chronic heart failure is defined as at least 6 months
  • Patients are clinically stable in the opinion of the clinical team looking after the patient
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • <18 or >70 years of age at the time of consent
  • Pregnancy or within 6 months of giving birth
  • Women of child-bearing potential not using an effective method of contraception
  • Men not using an effective method of contraception
  • Suspected or active viral, fungal or parasitic infection within 48 hours prior to administration of IMP, in the opinion of the investigator*.
  • Patients at a high risk of thrombosis in the opinion of the investigator
  • Patients with a previous episode of LVAD thrombosis
  • Patients with persistently raised lactate dehydrogenase (LDH >2.5 ULN)
  • Patients requiring triple anticoagulation i.e. warfarin and dual anti-platelet
  • Patients participating in another clinical trial

  • Patients unable to comply with the protocol mandated procedures for social or other reasons, in the opinion of the investigator and primary care physician

    • Eligible, enrolled and randomised patients who develop an infection will have study treatment delayed until 7 or more days after the time point when infection is no longer clinically evident.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: AAV1/SERCA2A
SERCA gene therapy
Genetic: AAV1/SERCA2a
AAV1/SERCA2a will be delivered by a percutaneous method in the catheter laboratory. Dose: 1x 10^13 DRP (DNase resistant particles)
Other Names:
  • MYDICAR (R)
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo (saline solution)
Drug: Placebo
Placebo aliquots will be of the same composition as the investigational medicinal product with the absence of the active ingredient and will be visually indistinguishable from the medicinal product. Placebo is prepared and handled exactly as above in a blinded fashion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Safety and Feasibility of Administering AAV1/SERCA2a to LVAD Patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety is defined as the incidence of patients experiencing death and major adverse cardiovascular events, and out of range laboratory values. Both AAV1/SERCA2a treated cohorts (NAb+ and NAb-) will be compared to the placebo group.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Exogenous Viral Vector Genome in the Myocardium Measured by qPCR for the Viral DNA
Time Frame: 6 months
The trial was terminated early with only 5 subjects enrolled. As a result full statistical analysis for both primary and secondary outcomes was impossible and a more pragmatic approach was undertaken to assess product safety.
6 months
Left Ventricular Function (LVEF)
Time Frame: 6 months
Left ventricular function assessed by echocardiography and exercise capacity (6MWT, MVO2) during minimal LVAD support (low/no flow settings depending upon device) LVEF expressed as %
6 months
Levels of SERCA2a Protein
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Other Relevant Proteins e.g. Phospholamban, the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Release Channel, the Na+/Ca2+-Exchanger.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Function of Isolated Myocytes
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imperial College London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
British Heart Foundation
Leducq Foundation
Celladon Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CRO782
  • 2007-002809-48 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on AAV1/SERCA2a

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings