Association Corticosteroid/Azathioprine in Microscopic Polyangiitis/ Polyarteritis Nodosa or Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg Strauss Syndrome) (CHUSPAN2)

September 5, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Evaluation of a New Treatment Strategy for Patients With Microscopic Polyangiitis, Polyarteritis Nodosa or Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg Strauss Syndrome) Without Poor Prognosis Factors

To determine whether a combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine can achieve a higher remission rate and a lower subsequent relapse rate in patients with newly-diagnosed microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg Strauss syndrome) with no poor prognosis factor (FFS=0), and without significantly increasing the rate of adverse events, as compared to corticosteroids alone. The study hypothesis is a reduction of the absolute risk of treatment failure or relapse within the first 24 months following initiation of therapy of least 25%.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with new diagnosis of 1) microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg Strauss syndrome) and 2) without any factor of poor prognosis according to the French five factors score (FFS - including creatininemia >140µmol/l, proteinuria >1 g/24 h, specific gastro-intestinal involvement, specific cardiomyopathy, and CNS involvement) can be included at diagnosis or within the first 15 days following initiation of corticosteroids. Treatment is randomly assigned, centrally, and received in a double-blinded fashion. It consists in a combination of azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day) and corticosteroids (starting at 1 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks then progressively tapered over a mean of 50 weeks, varying according to patient's weight) or, for the control group, the same corticosteroid therapy plus placebo. Duration of azathioprine or placebo is 12 months, and patients are followed for 12 additional months, yielding in a total duration of the protocol of 24 months after entry for each patient. End point is the number of patients who achieve sustained remission and who do not suffer a relapse during the 24 months of the study protocol. Based on the results of the early CHUSPAN trial for similar patients treated with corticosteroids alone, the cumulative rate of failures and relapses can be estimated at 40% at 24 months. The primary hypothesis of the CHUSPAN 2 is a reduction by at least 25% for the rate of this combined parameter of remission-treatment failure and relapse at 24 months. Based on this hypothesis, using a bilateral test, with a significance level of 5%, a beta level of 80% and an estimated 5% of lost-of-follow-up, 104 patients must be included. Secondary end points include the initial remission rate (independently of subsequent relapses), rate of adverse events and their severity according to the WHO toxicity grading system, number of deaths, number of patients who could not be weaned of corticosteroids, area under the curve for corticosteroids, and different scales, such as BVAS (activity of the disease), VDI (damage), HAQ, SF36, ADL and the evaluation of the need for health care facilities.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
114

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Hopital Cochin Pôle de Médecine UF Médecine Interne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female patients
  • aged over 18 years
  • new diagnosis of microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg Strauss syndrome), satisfying ACR 1990 and/or Chapel Hill Nomenclature criteria (positive biopsy is not mandatory providing those criteria are fulfilled)
  • with no factor of poor prognosis according to the French five factors score (FFS=0)
  • at diagnosis or within the first 21 days following initiation of corticosteroids
  • signed information and consent form
  • patients covered by Health Insurance
  • having had a baseline physical examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis nodosa or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg Strauss syndrome) with one or more factor(s) of poor prognosis according to the French five factors score (FFS ≥ 1)
  • patients with polyarteritis nodosa with ANCA, not satisfying the criteria for microscopic polyangiitis
  • patients with clinically overt alveolar hemorrhage or respiratory distress syndrome
  • patient treated with corticosteroids for more than 15 days or already receiving another immunosuppressant
  • relapsing vasculitis
  • other vasculitis, especially secondary vasculitides
  • vasculitis secondary or associated with a viral infection, such as hepatitis B or C virus, or HIV
  • malignancy
  • pregnancy and breast feeding,women of child-bearing age not willing or with contra-indication to receive contraception
  • contra-indication to any of the study agents
  • need to continue allopurinol for those patients taking allopurinol
  • consent deny or inability to receive information and give consent
  • participation in another concomitant therapeutic trial
  • no affiliation to any of the general French health care system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
Drug: corticosteroid and azathioprine
Drug: corticosteroid and azathioprine
  • Corticosteroid 1 mg/kg/day with a conventional decrease dose
  • Azathioprine : 2 mg/kg/day during one year in 2 to 3 times a day by oral route
Placebo Comparator: 2
Drug: corticosteroid and placebo
Drug: corticosteroid and placebo
  • Corticosteroid 1 mg/kg/day with a conventional decrease dose
  • Placebo : 2 mg/kg/day during one year in 2 to 3 times a day by oral route

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
combined rate of remission-treatment failures and minor or major relapses at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
initial remission rate (independently of subsequent relapse)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
number of patients who have a minor or major relapse
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
number of serious treatment-related adverse effects
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
number of patients with at least one treatment-related adverse effect
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
severity of treatment-related effects according to the WHO toxicity grading system (grades 1 to 4; grades 3 and 4 for the severity)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
number of deaths and causes
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
number of patients who could not be weaned of corticosteroids and dose required
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
area under the curve for corticosteroids
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
different scales, such as BVAS (activity of the disease), VDI (damage), HAQ, SF36, ADL and the evaluation of the need for health care facilities.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
number of flares with or without asthma and/or eosinophilia (only for EGPA analysis)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Unité de Recherche Clinique Necker Cochin, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Loic Guillevin, MD, PhD, French Vasculitis Study Group

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P 060243

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings