Relapse Rate in Hepatitis C Patients Treated With Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin in Common Clinical Practice in France (P05484)(Completed) (RE-CHUT)

September 18, 2015 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Relapse Rate and Predictive Factors in the Treatment of Hepatitis C in Common Clinical Practice

The objective of this study is to determine the relapse rate in the French patient population with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) previously treated with PegInterferon Alfa-2b (Peg-IFN alfa-2b) plus Ribavirin according to standard clinical practice. Treatment was to be completed prior to the enrollment in the current study. The study will also aim to identify factors that are predictive of relapse. Relapse rate is defined as the percentage of patients with negative viral load at end of treatment who again have positive viral load at 6 months after the end of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-probability sampling: The study population consists of adult patients over the age of 18 affected by CHC who were previously treated for the first time with Peg-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin and achieved end-of-treatment response. Five hundred ninety patients must be recruited in order to evaluate the objectives of the study. The patients must meet all inclusion criteria and not meet any of the exclusion criteria in order to be included in the study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
97

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with hepatitis C previously treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin in common clinical practice at approximately 60 centers in France.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must demonstrate his/her continued willingness to participate in the study.
  • The patient must be at least 18 years of age, of either gender.
  • Patients with chronic hepatitis C (any genotype) who received Peg-IFN alfa-2b + Ribavirin as first treatment for hepatitis C.
  • Negative HCV-RNA at the end of treatment (24 or 48 weeks according to the product labeling as appropriate), measured by the assay used at each institution. Only institutions using an assay with a limit of detection of 50 IU/mL or less will be eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who completed treatment with PegInterferon Alfa-2b plus Ribavirin more than 4 weeks before study entry.
  • Patients with positive HCV-RNA at the end of treatment (24 or 48 weeks according to the product labeling as appropriate).
  • Patients treated for a period shorter than the enrollment period.
  • Patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV).
  • Patients who do not use appropriate effective method of birth control after the end of treatment (according to legal recommendations).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin
Participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin as first treatment, in common clinical practice, who had negative hepatitis-C virus (HCV)-ribonucleic acid (RNA) by the end of treatment (24 or 48 weeks per product labeling).
Drug: Ribavirin
Ribavirin administered in accordance with approved labeling
Other Names:
  • SCH 018908
Biological: Peg-IFN alfa-2b
Peg-IFN alfa-2b administered in accordance with approved labeling
Other Names:
  • SCH 054031

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Positive Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) at 24 Weeks Off-treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks post end of treatment (EOT)
HCV-RNA virus levels were measured by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay 24 weeks post end of treatment (EOT) with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin. Participants with positive HCV-RNA were considered relapsers.
24 weeks post end of treatment (EOT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response (RVR), Early Virologic Response (EVR), or Slow Response Who Relapsed After Treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks post EOT
Negative HCV-RNA at Week 4 of treatment with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin was considered RVR; negative HCV-RNA at Week 12 of treatment with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin was considered EVR; negative HCV-RNA between Week 12 and the end of treatment with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin was considered a slow response. For participants who achieved RVR, EVR, or slow response, the relapse rate at 24 Weeks post EOT was to be determined on this observational study; relapse was defined as positive HCV-RNA.
24 weeks post EOT
Assessment of Pre-treatment Risk Factors of Relapse in Participants With Sustained Virologic Response
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks post EOT
Baseline risk factors included but were not limited to viral load, genotype 1a versus 1b, histology, treatment compliance, gender, age, and substance abuse. Sustained virologic response was defined as having negative HCV-RNA at 24 weeks post EOT. Relapse was defined as positive HCV-RNA.
Baseline and 24 weeks post EOT
Number of Participants With Positive HCV-RNA at 72 Weeks Off-treatment
Time Frame: 72 weeks post EOT
HCV-RNA virus levels were measured by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay 72 weeks post EOT with Peg-IFN alfa-2b + ribavirin. Participants with positive HCV-RNA at Week 72 post EOT were considered late relapsers.
72 weeks post EOT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 28, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 31, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 21, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 18, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P05484

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings