Transdermal Electroacupuncture for Opioid Detoxification

October 15, 2014 updated by: Scott Lukas, Mclean Hospital
This single-blind, randomized clinical trial tests whether electroacupuncture, provided as an adjunctive treatment, improves outcomes among patients receiving inpatient opioid detoxification from opioids.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Opioid dependence continues to be a major public health concern in the United States, with prescription opioid abuse rapidly becoming one of the nation's biggest drug problems. Although there have been substantial improvements in the pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence, many patients relapse soon after detoxification. In China and other countries, acupuncture has been effective in the treatment of heroin dependence. The current study tests whether electroacupuncture, provided as an adjunctive treatment, produces improved outcomes among patients receiving inpatient detoxification from opioids. The primary hypothesis is that participants who receive active electroacupuncture, compared to those receiving sham electroacupuncture, will experience milder withdrawal symptoms, report less opioid craving, and maintain abstinence from opioids for longer duration following discharge. This study will be a single-blind, randomized clinical trial in which participants will receive either active or sham electroacupuncture. Participants will be recruited from the inpatient unit at the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Program at McLean Hospital. Participants will receive thrice daily 30-minute electroacupuncture treatments for 4 days. The Han's Acupoint Nerve Stimulator device will be used to stimulate acupoints on one hand (LI4/P8) and opposite arm (P6/TE5). This device emits a constant electric current transcutaneously via skin electrodes to stimulate relevant acupoints. It does not use needles and has no harmful side-effects. Participants will be followed for 2 weeks following discharge. Assessments will occur daily during the treatment phase and weekly during the follow-up phase. Assessments will include clinical interviews, questionnaires, urine toxicology screens, and medical record review. The results of this study will indicate whether short-term electroacupuncture may be of benefit to individuals receiving inpatient detoxification from opioids.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
48

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Belmont, Massachusetts, United States, 02478
        • Mclean Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current opioid dependence
  • Current buprenorphine detoxification
  • 18-59 years of age
  • English proficiency

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute mania, psychosis, or suicidality
  • Cognitive impairments precluding informed consent
  • Heart disease or contraindicated heart condition
  • Use of pace maker
  • History of seizure disorder
  • Current detoxification from alcohol or benzodiazepines
  • Inability to return to follow-up visits
  • For women, pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Active electroacupuncture
In the active electroacupuncture condition, the current is set at 2 times threshold (approximately 6-10 mA), which typically produces muscle twitching.
Device: Electroacupuncture
Participants are randomly assigned to receive either active or sham electroacupuncture using the Han's Acupoint Nerve Stimulator (HANS) device. The HANS method uses a non-invasive device that emits a constant electric current transcutaneously via skin electrodes to stimulate relevant acupoints: Heku (LI4) / Laogong (P8) on one hand and Neiguan (P6) / Waiguan (TE 5) on the opposite arm. Stimulation is delivered in the dense-and-disperse mode, alternating between 2 and 100 Hz at 3-second intervals. Participants receive thrice daily treatments for 4 days during inpatient opioid detoxification.
Sham Comparator: Sham electroacupuncture
In the sham electroacupuncture condition, the current is set at 1 mA, the lowest intensity possible before the HANS device shuts off; this is undetectable stimulation.
Device: Electroacupuncture
Participants are randomly assigned to receive either active or sham electroacupuncture using the Han's Acupoint Nerve Stimulator (HANS) device. The HANS method uses a non-invasive device that emits a constant electric current transcutaneously via skin electrodes to stimulate relevant acupoints: Heku (LI4) / Laogong (P8) on one hand and Neiguan (P6) / Waiguan (TE 5) on the opposite arm. Stimulation is delivered in the dense-and-disperse mode, alternating between 2 and 100 Hz at 3-second intervals. Participants receive thrice daily treatments for 4 days during inpatient opioid detoxification.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Using Drugs
Time Frame: 2 weeks following discharge
2 weeks following discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Craving (Self-report)
Time Frame: at 2-weeks post discharge
Self-report on scale of 3 to 30 (higher number indicates more craving)
at 2-weeks post discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mclean Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Scott E Lukas, PhD, Mclean Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 25, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2007-P000711

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings