Masitinib in Severe Indolent or Smoldering Systemic Mastocytosis (AB06006)

November 29, 2019 updated by: AB Science

Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Masitinib at 6 mg/kg/Day to Placebo in Treatment of Patients With Smouldering Systemic, Indolent Systemic or Cutaneous Mastocytosis With Handicap

The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of masitinib (AB1010) to placebo in patients with mastocytosis with handicap.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, conducted in 15 countries, evaluating the efficacy and safety of masitinib (6 mg/kg/day administered orally in two daily intakes over 24-weeks with a double-blind extension period possible) for the treatment of indolent systemic mastocytosis, smoldering mastocytosis or cutaneous mastocytosis, in patients with mast cells mediator release symptoms that are refractory to conventional symptomatic treatment.

A study protocol amendment restricted enrolment to patients with severe indolent and smoldering systemic mastocytosis. The objective of this phase 3 study was therefore to evaluate masitinib efficacy and safety in severe systemic mastocytosis patients, with or without D816V mutation of c-Kit. The primary objective of the phase 3 study was to detect a statistically significant difference between masitinib (plus optimal concomitant symptomatic treatments) and placebo (plus optimal concomitant symptomatic treatments) in cumulative response on four severe symptoms, referred to also as handicaps.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
135

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Amiens, France
        • CHU d'Amiens
      • Bobigny, France
        • Hopital Avicenne
      • Brest, France
        • Chu de Brest
      • Caen, France
        • CHu de Caen
      • Clermont Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Chu Clermont Ferrand
      • Lille, France
        • Hopital Claude Huriez
      • Limoges, France
        • CHU Dupuytren
      • Marseille, France
        • Hopital Nord
      • Marseille, France
        • Hôpital Ambroise Paré
      • Nancy, France
        • Hôpital Central
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU Hôtel Dieu
      • Nice, France
        • Hopital L'Archet II
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Necker
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Tenon
      • Pierre Bénite, France, 69495
        • CHU Lyon Sud
      • Pierre-Bénite, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
      • Poitiers, France
        • CHU Milétrie
      • Rennes, France
        • CHU Hopital Sud
      • Saint-Etienne, France
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
      • Toulouse, France
        • Hopital Purpan
      • Tours, France
        • Hopital Bretonneau
      • Troyes, France
        • Hopital des Hauts Clos
  • United States
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • UC Davis Health System , Department of Dermatology
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Md Anderson Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with one of the following documented mastocytosis as per WHO classification: Smouldering Systemic Mastocytosis, Severe Indolent Mastocytosis
  2. Patient with documented mastocytosis and evaluable disease based upon histological criteria: typical infiltrates of mast cells in a multifocal or diffuse pattern in skin and/or bone marrow biopsy
  3. Patient with documented treatment failure of his/her handicap(s) with at least one of the following therapy used at optimized dose: Anti H1, Anti H2, Proton pump inhibitor, Osteoclast inhibitor, Cromoglycate Sodium, Antileukotriene
  4. Handicapped status defined as at least two of the following handicaps, including at least one among pruritus, flushes, depression and fatigue: pruritus score ≥ 9, number of flushes per week ≥ 8, Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD-17) score ≥ 19, number of stools per day ≥ 4, number of mictions per day ≥ 8, Fatigue Impact Scale total score (asthenia) ≥ 75
  5. Patients with OPA ≥ 2 (moderate to intolerable general handicap)
  6. ECOG ≤ 2
  7. Patient with adequate organ function

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient with one of the following mastocytosis: Cutaneous Mastocytosis, Not documented Smouldering Systemic Mastocytosis or Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis, Systemic Mastocytosis with an Associated clonal Hematologic Non Mast cell lineage Disease (SM-AHNMD), Mast cell leukemia (MCL), Aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM)
  2. Previous treatment with any Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor
  3. Patient with recent cardiac history of: Acute coronary syndrome, Acute heart failure, Significant ventricular arrhythmia; patient with cardiac failure class III or IV; Syncope without known aetiology within 3 months, uncontrolled severe hypertension.
  4. Patient with any condition that the physician judges could be detrimental to subjects participating in this study; including any clinically important deviations from normal clinical laboratory values or concurrent medical events Previous treatment
  5. Change in the symptomatic treatment of mastocytosis or administration of any new treatment of mastocytosis within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  6. Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to baseline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Masitinib & BSC
Masitinib (6 mg/kg/day) administered as an add-on to optimal concomitant symptomatic treatment (i.e. best supportive care, BSC)
Drug: Masitinib
Masitinib 6 mg/kg/day
Other Names:
  • AB1010
Other: Best Supportive Care
Optimal concomitant symptomatic treatments. Includes: H1- and H2-antihistamines, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), sodium cromoglicate, antidepressants, leukotriene antagonists, interferon-alpha, 2-CdA, and corticosteroids.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo & BSC
Matching placebo administered as an add-on to optimal concomitant symptomatic treatment (i.e. best supportive care, BSC)
Drug: Placebo
Matching placebo
Other: Best Supportive Care
Optimal concomitant symptomatic treatments. Includes: H1- and H2-antihistamines, proton pump inhibitors (PPI), sodium cromoglicate, antidepressants, leukotriene antagonists, interferon-alpha, 2-CdA, and corticosteroids.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative response (4R75%)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The prospectively declared primary endpoint (4R75%) was cumulative response in at least one of four severe baseline symptoms of mast cell mediator release (pruritus, flushes, depression, or asthenia). Response was defined as a 75% improvement from baseline for any of these four symptoms. Cumulative response was defined as the number of actual responses between weeks 8 and 24, divided by the total number of possible responses over the same treatment period (ie, with five scheduled visits, each patient had a maximum of five to 20 possible responses depending on the number of severe baseline symptoms).
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative response (3R75%)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Cumulative response in at least one of three severe baseline symptoms (pruritus, flushes, or depression)
24 weeks
Cumulative response (2R75%)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Cumulative response in at least one of three severe baseline symptoms (pruritus or flushes)
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AB Science

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Olivier Lortholary, MD, PhD, Hopital Necker, Paris, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AB06006

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings