Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis and Ambulatory Continuous Interscalene Nerve Blocks

July 23, 2019 updated by: Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego

Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis and Ambulatory Continuous Interscalene Nerve Blocks: A Randomized, Triple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Study

Research study to determine if putting local anesthetic through a tiny tube next to the nerves that go to the shoulder will improve shoulder range-of-motion following the shoulder procedure performed on the frozen shoulder. It will also help determine if patients have a higher quality-of-life and less pain, require fewer pain pills, experience fewer sleep disturbances, and are more satisfied with their post-procedure pain control.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary Specific Aim: To determine if, compared with usual and customary analgesia, the addition of an ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve block will result in increased shoulder abduction following treatment for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.

Hypothesis: Following shoulder manipulation under a single-injection interscalene block for adhesive capsulitis, adding a three-day ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blcok to usual and customary post-manipulation analgesia will result in a significantly greater shoulder abduction improvement the day following the manipulation.

Secondary Specific Aims: To determine if, compared with usual and customary analgesia, the addition of an ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve block will result in an increased quality-of-life and shoulder range-of-motion, as well as a decreased chronic pain following treatment for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder.

Hypothesis 1: Following shoulder manipulation under a single-injection interscalene blcok for adhesive capsulitis, adding a three-day ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve block to usual and customary post-manipulation analgesia will result in a significantly increased quality-of-life improvement and shoulder range-of-motion compared wiht baseline values after three months.

Hypothesis 2: Following shoulder manipulation undera a single-injection interscalene block for adhesive capsulitis, adding a three-day ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve block to usual and costomary post-manipulation analgesia will result in a significantly decreased chronic pain compared with basedline falues after three months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • UCSD Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing theraputic manipulation for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder
  • age 18 years or older
  • accepting a single-injection nerve block for manipulation
  • understanding possible perineural infusion-related complications, study protocol, and catheter/pump care
  • having caretaker through the first night after manipulation
  • having an ASA physical status classification of 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindications for a CISB
  • any physical, mental or medical conditions which, in the opinion of the investigators, may confound quantifying postoperative pain resulting from surgery
  • known allergy or other contraindication to the study medications
  • pregnancy
  • known hepatic or renal insufficiency/disease
  • peripheral neuropathy of the surgical extremity
  • morbid obesity
  • inability to communicate with the investigators and hospital staff
  • moderate-to-severe shoulder arthritis
  • immunocompromised status of any etiology
  • incarceration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1. 0.2% Ropivicaine perinueral infusion
Patients will receive normal standard of care post-manipulation (single-injection brachial plexus nerve block, oral analgesics, and cold therapy). They will then be randomized to 0.2% Ropivicaine attached to the perineural catheter and an infusion will be initiated. The outcome measures will be assessed by study staff on the phone and at regular visits to the surgeon's office.
Procedure: Interscalene catheter with Ropivicaine or normal saline
Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: 0.2% Ropiviciane or normal saline in the infusion pump, following a shoulder manipulation for adhesive capsulitis. The patients will be followed by doctors and study staff to assess pain, range-of-motion and quality-of-life.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 2. Normal Saline perineural infusion
Patients will receive normal standard of care post-manipulation (single-injection brachial plexus nerve block, oral analgesics, and cold therapy). They will then be randomized to normal saline attached to the perineural catheter and an infusion will be initiated. The outcome measures will be assessed by study staff on the phone and at regular visits to the surgeon's office.
Procedure: Interscalene catheter with Ropivicaine or normal saline
Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: 0.2% Ropiviciane or normal saline in the infusion pump, following a shoulder manipulation for adhesive capsulitis. The patients will be followed by doctors and study staff to assess pain, range-of-motion and quality-of-life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Passive glenohumeral abduction, as evaluated using standard goniometry restricting scapular movement in a supine position. The difference in abduction the day following manipulation compared with the pre-manipulation value, expressed as a percentage.
Time Frame: change from baseline: measured immediately prior to manipulation and the morning following the manipulation.
change from baseline: measured immediately prior to manipulation and the morning following the manipulation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Adhesive Capsulitis

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adhesive Capsulitis

Clinical Trials on Interscalene catheter with Ropivicaine or normal saline

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings