Intraoperative Fluid Management in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

May 19, 2009 updated by: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Intraoperative Fluid Management in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery - Does it Make a Difference?

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of 'high' versus 'low' volume intraoperative fluid administration (Ringer Lactate, RL) on intra- and postoperative parameters, in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (i.e., gastric bypass), in order to establish evidence-based data for perioperative fluid management in this patient population. Based on their experience as well as several reports in the literature, the investigators hypothesized that a restrictive approach to intraoperative hydration will reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and the recovery time of gastrointestinal (GI) function, and shorten hospital stay.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Obesity, a chronic disease that is increasing in prevalence in adults, adolescents, and children, is now considered to be a global epidemic. The prevalence of obesity has increased markedly in the last two decades and it is now considered to be a global epidemic. In the US 65% of all adults are overweight or obese and 30% are obese. Surgery is the only effective treatment for morbid obesity, and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has become the procedure of choice for these patients.

Several studies on perioperative fluid management have reported that 'high volume' regimens may result in overhydration having deleterious effects on cardiac and pulmonary function, recovery of GI motility, tissue oxygenation, wound healing and coagulation. Most reported randomized trials suggest that perioperative fluid management has evolved to a more restricted regimen. Specifically, restricted fluid volumes applied during bariatric procedures have been shown to reduce perioperative complications (pulmonary dysfunction, hypoxia, nausea and vomiting), thereby decrease the prevalence of morbidity and mortality associated with such procedures.

We wished to evaluate in a prospective randomized study the impact of fluid management on perioperative parameters in patients undergoing a variety of laparoscopic bariatric procedures: Roux-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB), Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (LDS), or Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).

Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups receiving either 4 ml/kg•hr or 10 ml/kg•hr of RL solution throughout the intra-operative period.

The primary endpoints of the study included: mortality rate and incidence of postoperative complications, during primary hospitalization. Readmission rate to the hospital within 30 days of surgery was another primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included time till the patient resumed drinking and consuming soft food, length of hospital stay, differences in hematocrit, creatinine concentrations and oxygen saturation in the first and third postoperative days and with discharge, and the number of patients receiving transfusion of blood and blood products.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
107

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients ( >18 years) with an American Society of Anesthesiology physical status of I-III who were presenting for laparoscopic bariatric surgery, were prospectively studied.

  • Patients were considered eligible if they had a BMI > 40, or > 35 and at least one comorbid condition and were scheduled to undergo one of the following laparoscopic operations:

    • Roux-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB)
    • Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (LDS), or
    • Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged younger than 18 years.
  • Patients with renal dysfunction (creatinine > 50% upper limit of normal value).
  • Congestive heart failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: 1: Restricted protocol (RG) group
Received 4 ml/kg•hr of Lactated Ringer's solution (RL) throughout the intra-operative period.
Drug: Lactated Ringer's solution
Patients in the RG received 4 ml/kg•hr of Lactated Ringer's solution (RL) throughout the intra-operative period
Other Names:
  • low fluid volume
Drug: Lactated Ringer's solution
patients in the LG received 10 ml/kg•hr of RL solution intraoperatively
Other Names:
  • high fluid volume
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2: Liberal protocol (LG) group
Received 10 ml/kg•hr of RL solution intraoperatively.
Drug: Lactated Ringer's solution
Patients in the RG received 4 ml/kg•hr of Lactated Ringer's solution (RL) throughout the intra-operative period
Other Names:
  • low fluid volume
Drug: Lactated Ringer's solution
patients in the LG received 10 ml/kg•hr of RL solution intraoperatively
Other Names:
  • high fluid volume

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
postoperative complications: mortality and morbidity (including readmissions)
Time Frame: 30 postoperative days (PODs)
30 postoperative days (PODs)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
GI recovery: time until the patient resumed drinking and consuming soft food
Time Frame: 3 PODs
3 PODs
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: postoperative period
postoperative period
differences in hematocrit, creatinine concentrations and oxygen saturation in the first and third postoperative days and with discharge
Time Frame: primary hospitalization
primary hospitalization
the number of patients receiving transfusion of blood and blood products
Time Frame: 3 PODs
3 PODs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrei Keidar, MD, Hadassa Medical Organization

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 20, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2009

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TASMC-09-IM-38590207-CTIL

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings