Evaluation of Effect of Doxycycline Verses Placebo on Retinal Function and Diabetic Retinopathy (POC2)

October 30, 2018 updated by: Thomas Gardner

Proof-of-Concept 2 (POC2): Evaluation of Effect of Doxycycline Verses Placebo on Retinal Function and Diabetic Retinopathy Progression in Patients With Mild to Moderate Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

This 24 month randomized research study will evaluate whether doxycycline can slow the deterioration or improve retinal function among patients with mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The objective of this proof-of-concept study is to investigate whether doxycycline can slow the deterioration or improve retinal function among patients with mild to moderate NPDR (with abnormal retinal function defined as a foveal sensitivity < 30.91 dB on Matrix frequency doubling perimetry [FDP]). Based on results of the END DR Study, the primary visual function endpoint in the POC 2 Study will be performance on the Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology Perimeter. This test was the most sensitive to NPDR of the visual function endpoints the investigators evaluated in the END DR Study. This selection is aggressive because the investigators lack natural history data to estimate the 2-year rate of change in the endpoint; in fact, a major output of this POC 2 Study will be 2-year natural history data using several visual function endpoints. The investigators are enrolling patients who have moderate dysfunction; that is, patients who fall outside the 95% confidence interval of normal performance on FDP. These patients will have the opportunity to improve their FDP performance to "normal" levels as well as progress to more severe FDP impairment associated with more advanced disease. Secondary endpoints include visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field, and dark adaptation. The tests will be performed in the Ophthalmology Department of the Penn State College of Medicine. The 24-month proof-of-concept clinical study will involve a prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial including 60 adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who have mild to moderate NPDR (ETDRS levels 20 to 43), and in whom retinal photocoagulation is not anticipated (by the investigator) within the subsequent 2 years. Participants will be randomized to receive either doxycycline monohydrate 50mg or an identical placebo once daily for 24 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years old
  • diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (defined as current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents and/or insulin for the treatment of diabetes)
  • have a hemoglobin A1c < 11% at pre-qualification visit
  • able and willing to give informed consent
  • best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity (10) in study eye ≥ 69 letters (20/40)
  • mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (ETDRS levels 20 to 43) (11), and in whom retinal photocoagulation is not anticipated (by the investigator) within the subsequent 2 years
  • able to perform reliable visual field and dark adaptation testing
  • central subfield thickness on OCT ≤ 275 microns
  • media clarity and pupil dilation sufficient for high-quality fundus photographs
  • abnormal retinal function defined as:
  • abnormal FDP function as defined by a foveal sensitivity ≤ 30.91 dB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior panretinal photocoagulation in the study eye
  • prior focal/grid laser photocoagulation in the macula in the study eye
  • intraocular pressure in the study eye > 22 mmHg by Goldmann tonometry
  • history of pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye
  • systemic or intravitreal anti-VEGF agent to the study eye or the fellow eye within the past 3 months
  • peribulbar steroid injection to the study eye or the fellow eye within the past 6 months
  • intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide to the study eye within the past 4 months
  • expectation by the investigator that retinal photocoagulation or other treatment for diabetic retinopathy (e.g., focal/grid laser to study eye, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide to study eye, intravitreal anti-VEGF agent to study or fellow eye, ruboxistaurin or systemic anti-VEGF agent for diabetic macular edema) will be administered in the subsequent 24months
  • an ocular condition (other than diabetes) is present in the study eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, might alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., retinal vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc)
  • anticipated need for cataract surgery in the study eye in the subsequent 24 months in the opinion of the investigator
  • history of major ocular surgery (including cataract surgery, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc) in the study eye within prior 6 months or anticipated within the subsequent 24 months following randomization
  • aphakia in the study eye
  • history of YAG capsulotomy performed in the study eye within 2 months prior to randomization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Cellulose Placebo Capsule
Experimental: doxycycline monohydrate
Drug: doxycycline monohydrate
50 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Mean Change in the Foveal Sensitivity of Matrix Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) From Baseline in the Treated Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
Baseline and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Thickness Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
Anatomic outcomes were assessed through optical coherence. Positive numbers indicate increases in thickness.
Baseline and 24 months
Change in Macular Volume
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
Baseline and 24 months
Number of Participants With Progression to PDR, and Single or Multiple Step Progression in ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Level
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
Participants are shown categorically by whether they reached PDR, or whether their diabetic retinopathy levels changed by one grade or more, as analyzed by fundus photography.
Baseline to 24 months
Number of Participants Who Developed Vitreous or Preretinal Hemorrhage
Time Frame: 24 months
Any participants who developed vitreous or preretinal hemorrhage were counted. Had there been any preretinal hemorrhages (a subcategory of vitreous hemorrhage) these would have been shown as a separate row.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Thomas Gardner

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
Penn State University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Thomas W Gardner, MD.,MS., University of Michigan, Kellogg Eye Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 30791

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings