LBH589 in Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

January 10, 2021 updated by: Irene Ghobrial, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Phase II Trial of LBH589 (Panobinostat) in Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

The purpose of this research study is to assess the overall response rate of LBH589 in patients with relapsed or refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. LBH589 is a newly discovered compound that has killed Waldenstrom cells in laboratory studies, however, it is not known if LBH589 will show the same activity in people with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. This drug has been used in research for the treatment of other types of cancer, such as multiple myeloma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This phase II study is designed to assess the toxicity profile and the proportion of overall response in patients with relapsed or refractory WM. This will study the effect of single agent LBH589 on response in these patients. Efficacy measures will include both objective clinical measurements and investigator-reported outcomes. Response and time to event analyses will follow the criteria set forth in the International Waldenstrom consortium recommendations. Prior to the start of the study, investigators will assess disease and perform a CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis.

Response will be assessed after 2 cycles. If patients have stable disease or response, then they will continue on therapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity, being assessed every cycle until the sixth cycle and then every 3 months. Patients who show progression after 2 cycles will come off therapy and undergo event monitoring every 3 months. All responses will be assessed by M-protein quantification and immunofixation from serum and IgM monoclonal protein level. In addition, BM biopsies will be done at baseline, at the end of cycle 6 and at the end of all therapy. The protocol was amended because of concerns of toxicity to allow a starting dose of 25 mg; 12/36 (33%) patients were enrolled on the 25 mg dose.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
39

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80220
        • Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients aged 18 years or older
  • Must have received prior therapy for their WM, any number of prior therapies is allowed
  • Must have symptomatic relapsed or refractory WM
  • Measurable monoclonal IgM protein in the blood and presence of lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow during any previous bone marrow
  • Laboratory values as described in the protocol
  • Clinically euthyroid
  • ECOG Performance Status of 2 or less

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior HDAC, DAC, HSP90 inhibitors or valproic acid for the treatment of cancer
  • Patients who will need valproic acid for any medical condition during the study or within 5 days prior to first LBH589 treatment
  • Peripheral neuropathy CTCAE grade 2 or higher
  • Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac diseases
  • Impairment of GI function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of LBH589
  • Diarrhea > CTCAE grade 1
  • Other concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions including abnormal laboratory values, that could cause unacceptable safety risks or compromise compliance with the protocol
  • Patients using medications that have a relative risk of prolonging the QT interval or inducing torsade de pointes if treatment cannot be discontinued or switched to a different medication prior to starting study drug
  • Patients who have received targeted agents within 2 weeks or within 5 half-lives of the agent and active metabolites (whichever is longer) and who have not recovered from side effects of those therapies
  • Patients who have received chemotherapy or rituximab within 3 weeks or less; or radiation therapy to > 30% of marrow-bearing bone within 2 weeks or less prior to starting study treatment; or who have not yet recovered from side effects of such therapies
  • Patients who have received corticosteroids 2 weeks or less prior to registration. Patients may be receiving chronic corticosteroids if they are being given for disorders other than than Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia
  • Patients with active bleeding tendency or receiving any treatment with therapeutic doses of sodium warfarin or coumadin derivatives. Low doses of Coumadin to maintain line patency is allowed
  • Patients who have undergone major surgery 4 weeks or less prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding or women of childbearing potential not using an effective method of birth control
  • Male patients whose sexual partners are women of childbearing potential not using effective methods of birth control
  • Patients with prior malignancy within the last 5 years (except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma, or in situ cancer of the cervix)
  • Patients with known positivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C; baseline testing for HIV and hepatitis C is not required
  • Patients with a significant history of non-compliance to medical regimens or unwilling or unable to comply with the instructions given to him/her by the study staff

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LBH589

30 mg three days a week (Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays).

1 cycle was 28 days

Dose modifications for attributable toxicities allowed for reduction to:

  • 25 mg, 20 mg three times a week every week

  • Or 20 mg three times a week every other week. No dose re-escalation was allowed.

    • The protocol was amended on 6/15/2010 because of concerns of toxicity to allow a starting dose of 25 mg; 12/36 (33%) patients were enrolled on the 25 mg dose.
Drug: LBH589
Other Names:
  • panobinostat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate
Time Frame: Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles. The median number of completed cycles of therapy was 5 (0- 32). As such observed up to ~32 months.

Overall response rate is percentage of participants with complete (CR), very good partial (VGPR), partial (PR), or minimal response (MR) as best response during treatment.

CR

  • Disappearance of monoclonal protein by immunofixation
  • No histologic evidence of bone marrow involvement
  • Resolution of any adenopathy/organomegaly (confirmed by CT scan), or signs or symptoms attributable to WM.
  • Second immunofixation required for confirmation.

VGPR

-At least 90% reduction of serum monoclonal IgM concentration on protein electrophoresis.

PR

  • At least 50% reduction of serum monoclonal IgM concentration on protein electrophoresis and at least 50% decrease in adenopathy/organomegaly on physical examination or on CT scan.
  • No new symptoms or signs of active disease.

MR

  • At least 25% but less than 50% reduction of serum monoclonal IgM by protein electrophoresis.
  • No new symptoms or signs of active disease.
Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles. The median number of completed cycles of therapy was 5 (0- 32). As such observed up to ~32 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. If taken off treatment at cycle 2 for disease progression, assessed every 3 months. The median (range) follow up from treatment start is 7.7 month (0.9 - 29.7).
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from start of treatment to disease progression or death from any cause as estimated by Kaplan Meier methods. Patients who have not progressed and are alive are censored at the date the patient is known to be progression-free.
Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. If taken off treatment at cycle 2 for disease progression, assessed every 3 months. The median (range) follow up from treatment start is 7.7 month (0.9 - 29.7).
Median Time to Progression
Time Frame: Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. If taken off treatment at cycle 2 for disease progression, assessed every 3 months. The median (range) follow up from treatment start is 7.7 month (0.9 - 29.7).
Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the time from start of treatment to progression. Patients who have not progressed are censored at the date the patient is last known to be progression free.
Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. If taken off treatment at cycle 2 for disease progression, assessed every 3 months. The median (range) follow up from treatment start is 7.7 month (0.9 - 29.7).
Median Duration of Response
Time Frame: Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. If taken off treatment at cycle 2 for disease progression, assessed every 3 months. The median (range) follow up from treatment start is 7.7 month (0.9 - 29.7).

Duration of response DR is defined as the time from the date of first response after treatment to the date of disease progression Patients who have died for any cause or are alive without progression are censored at the date the patient is last know to be progression-free.

Duration of response DR is defined as the time from the date of first response after treatment to the date of disease progression or death for any cause. Patients who are alive without progression are censored at the date the patient is last know to be progression-free.
Assessed after 2nd cycle and then every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. If taken off treatment at cycle 2 for disease progression, assessed every 3 months. The median (range) follow up from treatment start is 7.7 month (0.9 - 29.7).
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Treatment-Related Thrombocytopenia
Time Frame: Assessed after 2nd cycle, every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. Once off-treatment, adverse events will be assessed for 30 days. The median (range) number of completed cycles of therapy was 5 (0- 32). Therefore, up to ~33 months.

Grade 3 thrombocytopenia is defined as having 25,000-50,000 /uL platelets

Grade 4 thrombocytopenia is defined as having < 25,000 /uL platelets
Assessed after 2nd cycle, every subsequent cycle for 6 cycles and then every 3 months. Once off-treatment, adverse events will be assessed for 30 days. The median (range) number of completed cycles of therapy was 5 (0- 32). Therefore, up to ~33 months.
Acetylated Histone H3 and Overall Response Association
Time Frame: Bone marrow biopsies were obtained at the start of treatment (baseline) and after the 6th cycle.
Acetylated-histone-H3 levels were obtained through bone marrow biopsies and measured using established methods. This analysis aimed to analyze the association between overall response and percent change of acetylated histone h3 in samples using a paired t-test.
Bone marrow biopsies were obtained at the start of treatment (baseline) and after the 6th cycle.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Novartis
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Irene Ghobrial, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09-071
  • CLBH589CUS56T (Other Identifier: Novartis)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Clinical Trials on LBH589

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings