A Study of Tocilizumab With or Without Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

July 23, 2014 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence to Tocilizumab in Combination With Methotrexate or Tocilizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis in Local Environment.

This open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study will evaluate the adherence and persistence to tocilizumab therapy in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis, who have an inadequate clinical response to non-biologic DMARDs. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg as intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate or in case of intolerance to methotrexate as monotherapy. The anticipated time of study treatment is 6 months. The target sample size is 20-50 patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients >/= 18 years of age
  • moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis
  • inadequate response, or intolerance to previous therapy with one or more traditional DMARDs
  • DAS >3.6
  • pneumology examination (including chest x-ray and quantiferon)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years of age
  • active infection
  • active tuberculosis
  • uncontrolled hyperlipoproteinaemia
  • demyelinating disorders
  • concomitant anti-TNF drugs
  • history of intestinal ulceration and diverticulitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Single Arm
Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenous infusion once in 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Adherent to Original Treatment
Time Frame: Week 24
Adherence rate to original treatment according to the protocol included all participants that received the study drug beginning from Week 8 and remaining until the end of the study. This number represents participants with no changes in treatment protocol, participants with treatment discontinuation, and participants with dose reduction, but not participants that withdrew from the study prematurely.
Week 24
Percentage of Participants Receiving Less Than or Equal to (≤) 1 Dose of Study Drug Who Discontinued Treatment for Any Reason
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Receiving Greater Than (>) 1 Dose Who Discontinued Treatment for Any Reason
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Withdrawing From the Study Prematurely for Any Reason
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Dose Reduction to Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 24
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hr]) and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (participant-rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 ≤3.2 equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 24
Patient Global Assessment of Pain
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Participants were asked to rate their pain using a 0 to 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain. The participant was asked to mark the line corresponding to their perceived level of pain and the distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured.
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The participant's assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm VAS ranging from no activity (0) to maximal activity (100). The participant was asked to mark the line corresponding to their perceived level of disease activity and the distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured.
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm VAS ranging from no arthritis activity (0) to maximal arthritis activity (100). The physician was asked to mark the line corresponding to their perceived level of the participant's disease activity and the distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured.
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The following 28 joints were assessed by the physician for swelling: metacarpophalangeal I-V (10), thumb interphalangeal (2), hand proximal interphalangeal II-V (8), wrist (2), elbow (2), shoulders (2), and knees (2). Joints were rated as 0=not swollen or 1=swollen. The total number was calculated from all the joints for a maximum score of 28.
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Tender Joint Count (TJC)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The following 28 joints were assessed by the physician for tenderness: metacarpophalangeal I-V (10), thumb interphalangeal (2), hand proximal interphalangeal II-V (8), wrist (2), elbow (2), shoulders (2), and knees (2). Joints were rated as 0=not tender or 1=tender. The total number was calculated from all the joints for a maximum score of 28.
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 24
ESR indirectly measures how much inflammation is in the body. A higher ESR is indicative of increased inflammation.
Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 24
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 24
CRP is an acute phase protein. Levels of CRP increase with inflammation.
Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 24
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The HAQ-DI was used to assess the physical ability and functional status of participants as well as quality of life. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from 4 response categories, ranging from 'without any difficulty' (Score=0) to 'unable to do' (Score=3). The overall score is the average of each of the 8 category scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where 0 represents no disability and 3 very severe, high-dependency disability.
Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 12, and 24
The SF-36 measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 8 subscales (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health) which can be aggregated to derive a physical-component summary score and a mental-component summary score. Scores for each subscale range from 0 to 10, and the composite scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.
Weeks 0, 12, and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ML22508
  • 2009-011520-53

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings